Cargando…

Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study

Worldwide, health care professionals working in operating rooms (ORs) are exposed to electrocautery smoke on a daily basis. Aims of this study were to determine composition and concentrations of electrocautery smoke in the OR using mass spectrometry. Prospective observational study at a tertiary car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kocher, Gregor J., Koss, Abigail R., Groessl, Michael, Schefold, Joerg C., Luedi, Markus M., Quapp, Christopher, Dorn, Patrick, Lutz, Jon, Cappellin, Luca, Hutterli, Manuel, Lopez-Hilfiker, Felipe D., Al-Hurani, Mohammad, Sesia, Sergio B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35322134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08970-y
_version_ 1784673462517760000
author Kocher, Gregor J.
Koss, Abigail R.
Groessl, Michael
Schefold, Joerg C.
Luedi, Markus M.
Quapp, Christopher
Dorn, Patrick
Lutz, Jon
Cappellin, Luca
Hutterli, Manuel
Lopez-Hilfiker, Felipe D.
Al-Hurani, Mohammad
Sesia, Sergio B.
author_facet Kocher, Gregor J.
Koss, Abigail R.
Groessl, Michael
Schefold, Joerg C.
Luedi, Markus M.
Quapp, Christopher
Dorn, Patrick
Lutz, Jon
Cappellin, Luca
Hutterli, Manuel
Lopez-Hilfiker, Felipe D.
Al-Hurani, Mohammad
Sesia, Sergio B.
author_sort Kocher, Gregor J.
collection PubMed
description Worldwide, health care professionals working in operating rooms (ORs) are exposed to electrocautery smoke on a daily basis. Aims of this study were to determine composition and concentrations of electrocautery smoke in the OR using mass spectrometry. Prospective observational study at a tertiary care academic center, involving 122 surgical procedures of which 84 were 1:1 computer randomized to smoke evacuation system (SES) versus no SES use. Irritating, toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic VOCs were observed in OR air, with some exceeding permissible exposure limits (OSHA/NIOSH). Mean total concentration of harmful compounds was 272.69 ppb (± 189 ppb) with a maximum total concentration of harmful substances of 8991 ppb (at surgeon level, no SES). Maximum total VOC concentrations were 1.6 ± 1.2 ppm (minimally-invasive surgery) and 2.1 ± 1.5 ppm (open surgery), and total maximum VOC concentrations were 1.8 ± 1.3 ppm at the OR table ‘at surgeon level’ and 1.4 ± 1.0 ppm ‘in OR room air’ away from the operating table. Neither difference was statistically significant. In open surgery, SES significantly reduced maximum concentrations of specific VOCs at surgeon level, including aromatics and aldehydes. Our data indicate relevant exposure of health care professionals to volatile organic compounds in the OR. Surgical technique and distance to cautery devices did not significantly reduce exposure. SES reduced exposure to specific harmful VOC’s during open surgery. Trial Registration Number: NCT03924206 (clinicaltrials.gov).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8943181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89431812022-03-28 Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study Kocher, Gregor J. Koss, Abigail R. Groessl, Michael Schefold, Joerg C. Luedi, Markus M. Quapp, Christopher Dorn, Patrick Lutz, Jon Cappellin, Luca Hutterli, Manuel Lopez-Hilfiker, Felipe D. Al-Hurani, Mohammad Sesia, Sergio B. Sci Rep Article Worldwide, health care professionals working in operating rooms (ORs) are exposed to electrocautery smoke on a daily basis. Aims of this study were to determine composition and concentrations of electrocautery smoke in the OR using mass spectrometry. Prospective observational study at a tertiary care academic center, involving 122 surgical procedures of which 84 were 1:1 computer randomized to smoke evacuation system (SES) versus no SES use. Irritating, toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic VOCs were observed in OR air, with some exceeding permissible exposure limits (OSHA/NIOSH). Mean total concentration of harmful compounds was 272.69 ppb (± 189 ppb) with a maximum total concentration of harmful substances of 8991 ppb (at surgeon level, no SES). Maximum total VOC concentrations were 1.6 ± 1.2 ppm (minimally-invasive surgery) and 2.1 ± 1.5 ppm (open surgery), and total maximum VOC concentrations were 1.8 ± 1.3 ppm at the OR table ‘at surgeon level’ and 1.4 ± 1.0 ppm ‘in OR room air’ away from the operating table. Neither difference was statistically significant. In open surgery, SES significantly reduced maximum concentrations of specific VOCs at surgeon level, including aromatics and aldehydes. Our data indicate relevant exposure of health care professionals to volatile organic compounds in the OR. Surgical technique and distance to cautery devices did not significantly reduce exposure. SES reduced exposure to specific harmful VOC’s during open surgery. Trial Registration Number: NCT03924206 (clinicaltrials.gov). Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8943181/ /pubmed/35322134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08970-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kocher, Gregor J.
Koss, Abigail R.
Groessl, Michael
Schefold, Joerg C.
Luedi, Markus M.
Quapp, Christopher
Dorn, Patrick
Lutz, Jon
Cappellin, Luca
Hutterli, Manuel
Lopez-Hilfiker, Felipe D.
Al-Hurani, Mohammad
Sesia, Sergio B.
Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study
title Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_full Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_short Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_sort electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35322134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08970-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kochergregorj electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT kossabigailr electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT groesslmichael electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT schefoldjoergc electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT luedimarkusm electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT quappchristopher electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT dornpatrick electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT lutzjon electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT cappellinluca electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT hutterlimanuel electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT lopezhilfikerfeliped electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT alhuranimohammad electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT sesiasergiob electrocauterysmokeexposureandefficacyofsmokeevacuationsystemsinminimallyinvasiveandopensurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy