Cargando…

Magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Image segmentation is an essential step in the analysis and subsequent characterisation of brain tumours through magnetic resonance imaging. In the literature, segmentation methods are empowered by open-access magnetic resonance imaging datasets, such as the brain tumour segmentation dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhalodiya, Jayendra M, Lim Choi Keung, Sarah N, Arvanitis, Theodoros N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221074122
_version_ 1784673489538514944
author Bhalodiya, Jayendra M
Lim Choi Keung, Sarah N
Arvanitis, Theodoros N
author_facet Bhalodiya, Jayendra M
Lim Choi Keung, Sarah N
Arvanitis, Theodoros N
author_sort Bhalodiya, Jayendra M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Image segmentation is an essential step in the analysis and subsequent characterisation of brain tumours through magnetic resonance imaging. In the literature, segmentation methods are empowered by open-access magnetic resonance imaging datasets, such as the brain tumour segmentation dataset. Moreover, with the increased use of artificial intelligence methods in medical imaging, access to larger data repositories has become vital in method development. PURPOSE: To determine what automated brain tumour segmentation techniques can medical imaging specialists and clinicians use to identify tumour components, compared to manual segmentation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of 572 brain tumour segmentation studies during 2015–2020. We reviewed segmentation techniques using T1-weighted, T2-weighted, gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Moreover, we assessed physics or mathematics-based methods, deep learning methods, and software-based or semi-automatic methods, as applied to magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Particularly, we synthesised each method as per the utilised magnetic resonance imaging sequences, study population, technical approach (such as deep learning) and performance score measures (such as Dice score). STATISTICAL TESTS: We compared median Dice score in segmenting the whole tumour, tumour core and enhanced tumour. RESULTS: We found that T1-weighted, gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging are used the most in various segmentation algorithms. However, there is limited use of perfusion-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Moreover, we found that the U-Net deep learning technology is cited the most, and has high accuracy (Dice score 0.9) for magnetic resonance imaging-based brain tumour segmentation. CONCLUSION: U-Net is a promising deep learning technology for magnetic resonance imaging-based brain tumour segmentation. The community should be encouraged to contribute open-access datasets so training, testing and validation of deep learning algorithms can be improved, particularly for diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, where there are limited datasets available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8943308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89433082022-03-25 Magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: A systematic review Bhalodiya, Jayendra M Lim Choi Keung, Sarah N Arvanitis, Theodoros N Digit Health Review Article BACKGROUND: Image segmentation is an essential step in the analysis and subsequent characterisation of brain tumours through magnetic resonance imaging. In the literature, segmentation methods are empowered by open-access magnetic resonance imaging datasets, such as the brain tumour segmentation dataset. Moreover, with the increased use of artificial intelligence methods in medical imaging, access to larger data repositories has become vital in method development. PURPOSE: To determine what automated brain tumour segmentation techniques can medical imaging specialists and clinicians use to identify tumour components, compared to manual segmentation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of 572 brain tumour segmentation studies during 2015–2020. We reviewed segmentation techniques using T1-weighted, T2-weighted, gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Moreover, we assessed physics or mathematics-based methods, deep learning methods, and software-based or semi-automatic methods, as applied to magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Particularly, we synthesised each method as per the utilised magnetic resonance imaging sequences, study population, technical approach (such as deep learning) and performance score measures (such as Dice score). STATISTICAL TESTS: We compared median Dice score in segmenting the whole tumour, tumour core and enhanced tumour. RESULTS: We found that T1-weighted, gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging are used the most in various segmentation algorithms. However, there is limited use of perfusion-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Moreover, we found that the U-Net deep learning technology is cited the most, and has high accuracy (Dice score 0.9) for magnetic resonance imaging-based brain tumour segmentation. CONCLUSION: U-Net is a promising deep learning technology for magnetic resonance imaging-based brain tumour segmentation. The community should be encouraged to contribute open-access datasets so training, testing and validation of deep learning algorithms can be improved, particularly for diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, where there are limited datasets available. SAGE Publications 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8943308/ /pubmed/35340900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221074122 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article
Bhalodiya, Jayendra M
Lim Choi Keung, Sarah N
Arvanitis, Theodoros N
Magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: A systematic review
title Magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: A systematic review
title_full Magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: A systematic review
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: A systematic review
title_short Magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: A systematic review
title_sort magnetic resonance image-based brain tumour segmentation methods: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221074122
work_keys_str_mv AT bhalodiyajayendram magneticresonanceimagebasedbraintumoursegmentationmethodsasystematicreview
AT limchoikeungsarahn magneticresonanceimagebasedbraintumoursegmentationmethodsasystematicreview
AT arvanitistheodorosn magneticresonanceimagebasedbraintumoursegmentationmethodsasystematicreview