Cargando…

Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation

The design of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) continues to pose usability concerns for healthcare workers, which have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to develop a holistic model to guide mask design improvement. Dental students (n = 38) with experience...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cloet, Alison, Griffin, Linsey, Yu, Minji, Durfee, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35339761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103751
_version_ 1784673495932731392
author Cloet, Alison
Griffin, Linsey
Yu, Minji
Durfee, William
author_facet Cloet, Alison
Griffin, Linsey
Yu, Minji
Durfee, William
author_sort Cloet, Alison
collection PubMed
description The design of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) continues to pose usability concerns for healthcare workers, which have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to develop a holistic model to guide mask design improvement. Dental students (n = 38) with experience wearing N95 FFRs participated in a randomized wear trial of three alternative protective masks. A mixed methods survey was used to examine usability of individual mask design components, the relationship of facial/head area to mask features, and overall mask design. Survey results indicated MNmask v1 demonstrated higher usability in seal confidence (M = 3.46), while MNmask v2 performed higher in satisfactory fit (M = 3.50). Design components of nose wire and head/neck bands were the most problematic, while conditions of skin irritation and tight/loose fit created an unfavorable wear experience. To consider healthcare workers’ needs in improving the usability of protective masks, a model is presented to consider characteristics of fit, comfort, material, and design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8943342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89433422022-03-24 Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation Cloet, Alison Griffin, Linsey Yu, Minji Durfee, William Appl Ergon Article The design of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) continues to pose usability concerns for healthcare workers, which have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to develop a holistic model to guide mask design improvement. Dental students (n = 38) with experience wearing N95 FFRs participated in a randomized wear trial of three alternative protective masks. A mixed methods survey was used to examine usability of individual mask design components, the relationship of facial/head area to mask features, and overall mask design. Survey results indicated MNmask v1 demonstrated higher usability in seal confidence (M = 3.46), while MNmask v2 performed higher in satisfactory fit (M = 3.50). Design components of nose wire and head/neck bands were the most problematic, while conditions of skin irritation and tight/loose fit created an unfavorable wear experience. To consider healthcare workers’ needs in improving the usability of protective masks, a model is presented to consider characteristics of fit, comfort, material, and design. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-07 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8943342/ /pubmed/35339761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103751 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Cloet, Alison
Griffin, Linsey
Yu, Minji
Durfee, William
Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation
title Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation
title_full Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation
title_fullStr Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation
title_short Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation
title_sort design considerations for protective mask development: a remote mask usability evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35339761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103751
work_keys_str_mv AT cloetalison designconsiderationsforprotectivemaskdevelopmentaremotemaskusabilityevaluation
AT griffinlinsey designconsiderationsforprotectivemaskdevelopmentaremotemaskusabilityevaluation
AT yuminji designconsiderationsforprotectivemaskdevelopmentaremotemaskusabilityevaluation
AT durfeewilliam designconsiderationsforprotectivemaskdevelopmentaremotemaskusabilityevaluation