Cargando…
The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review
Vision impairment (VI) can have wide ranging economic impact on individuals, households, and health systems. The aim of this systematic review was to describe and summarise the costs associated with VI and its major causes. We searched MEDLINE (16 November 2019), National Health Service Economic Eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101354 |
_version_ | 1784673512824242176 |
---|---|
author | Marques, Ana Patricia Ramke, Jacqueline Cairns, John Butt, Thomas Zhang, Justine H. Jones, Iain Jovic, Marty Nandakumar, Allyala Faal, Hannah Taylor, Hugh Bastawrous, Andrew Braithwaite, Tasanee Resnikoff, Serge Khaw, Peng T. Bourne, Rupert Gordon, Iris Frick, Kevin Burton, Matthew J. |
author_facet | Marques, Ana Patricia Ramke, Jacqueline Cairns, John Butt, Thomas Zhang, Justine H. Jones, Iain Jovic, Marty Nandakumar, Allyala Faal, Hannah Taylor, Hugh Bastawrous, Andrew Braithwaite, Tasanee Resnikoff, Serge Khaw, Peng T. Bourne, Rupert Gordon, Iris Frick, Kevin Burton, Matthew J. |
author_sort | Marques, Ana Patricia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vision impairment (VI) can have wide ranging economic impact on individuals, households, and health systems. The aim of this systematic review was to describe and summarise the costs associated with VI and its major causes. We searched MEDLINE (16 November 2019), National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and the Health Technology Assessment database (12 December 2019) for partial or full economic evaluation studies, published between 1 January 2000 and the search dates, reporting cost data for participants with VI due to an unspecified cause or one of the seven leading causes globally: cataract, uncorrected refractive error, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, corneal opacity, trachoma. The search was repeated on 20 January 2022 to identify studies published since our initial search. Included studies were quality appraised using the British Medical Journal Checklist for economic submissions adapted for cost of illness studies. Results were synthesized in a structured narrative. Of the 138 included studies, 38 reported cost estimates for VI due to an unspecified cause and 100 reported costs for one of the leading causes. These 138 studies provided 155 regional cost estimates. Fourteen studies reported global data; 103/155 (66%) regional estimates were from high-income countries. Costs were most commonly reported using a societal (n = 48) or healthcare system perspective (n = 25). Most studies included only a limited number of cost components. Large variations in methodology and reporting across studies meant cost estimates varied considerably. The average quality assessment score was 78% (range 35–100%); the most common weaknesses were the lack of sensitivity analysis and insufficient disaggregation of costs. There was substantial variation across studies in average treatment costs per patient for most conditions, including refractive error correction (range $12–$201 ppp), cataract surgery (range $54–$3654 ppp), glaucoma (range $351–$1354 ppp) and AMD (range $2209–$7524 ppp). Future cost estimates of the economic burden of VI and its major causes will be improved by the development and adoption of a reference case for eye health. This could then be used in regular studies, particularly in countries with data gaps, including low- and middle-income countries in Asia, Eastern Europe, Oceania, Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8943414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89434142022-03-25 The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review Marques, Ana Patricia Ramke, Jacqueline Cairns, John Butt, Thomas Zhang, Justine H. Jones, Iain Jovic, Marty Nandakumar, Allyala Faal, Hannah Taylor, Hugh Bastawrous, Andrew Braithwaite, Tasanee Resnikoff, Serge Khaw, Peng T. Bourne, Rupert Gordon, Iris Frick, Kevin Burton, Matthew J. EClinicalMedicine Review Vision impairment (VI) can have wide ranging economic impact on individuals, households, and health systems. The aim of this systematic review was to describe and summarise the costs associated with VI and its major causes. We searched MEDLINE (16 November 2019), National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and the Health Technology Assessment database (12 December 2019) for partial or full economic evaluation studies, published between 1 January 2000 and the search dates, reporting cost data for participants with VI due to an unspecified cause or one of the seven leading causes globally: cataract, uncorrected refractive error, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, corneal opacity, trachoma. The search was repeated on 20 January 2022 to identify studies published since our initial search. Included studies were quality appraised using the British Medical Journal Checklist for economic submissions adapted for cost of illness studies. Results were synthesized in a structured narrative. Of the 138 included studies, 38 reported cost estimates for VI due to an unspecified cause and 100 reported costs for one of the leading causes. These 138 studies provided 155 regional cost estimates. Fourteen studies reported global data; 103/155 (66%) regional estimates were from high-income countries. Costs were most commonly reported using a societal (n = 48) or healthcare system perspective (n = 25). Most studies included only a limited number of cost components. Large variations in methodology and reporting across studies meant cost estimates varied considerably. The average quality assessment score was 78% (range 35–100%); the most common weaknesses were the lack of sensitivity analysis and insufficient disaggregation of costs. There was substantial variation across studies in average treatment costs per patient for most conditions, including refractive error correction (range $12–$201 ppp), cataract surgery (range $54–$3654 ppp), glaucoma (range $351–$1354 ppp) and AMD (range $2209–$7524 ppp). Future cost estimates of the economic burden of VI and its major causes will be improved by the development and adoption of a reference case for eye health. This could then be used in regular studies, particularly in countries with data gaps, including low- and middle-income countries in Asia, Eastern Europe, Oceania, Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa. Elsevier 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8943414/ /pubmed/35340626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101354 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Marques, Ana Patricia Ramke, Jacqueline Cairns, John Butt, Thomas Zhang, Justine H. Jones, Iain Jovic, Marty Nandakumar, Allyala Faal, Hannah Taylor, Hugh Bastawrous, Andrew Braithwaite, Tasanee Resnikoff, Serge Khaw, Peng T. Bourne, Rupert Gordon, Iris Frick, Kevin Burton, Matthew J. The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review |
title | The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review |
title_full | The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review |
title_short | The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review |
title_sort | economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marquesanapatricia theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT ramkejacqueline theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT cairnsjohn theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT buttthomas theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT zhangjustineh theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT jonesiain theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT jovicmarty theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT nandakumarallyala theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT faalhannah theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT taylorhugh theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT bastawrousandrew theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT braithwaitetasanee theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT resnikoffserge theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT khawpengt theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT bournerupert theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT gordoniris theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT frickkevin theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT burtonmatthewj theeconomicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT marquesanapatricia economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT ramkejacqueline economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT cairnsjohn economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT buttthomas economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT zhangjustineh economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT jonesiain economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT jovicmarty economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT nandakumarallyala economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT faalhannah economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT taylorhugh economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT bastawrousandrew economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT braithwaitetasanee economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT resnikoffserge economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT khawpengt economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT bournerupert economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT gordoniris economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT frickkevin economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview AT burtonmatthewj economicsofvisionimpairmentanditsleadingcausesasystematicreview |