Cargando…
Diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of manual grading of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in detection of plateau iris configuration (PIC) based on the presence of standardised ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) criteria in at least two quadrants; namely, clinical dia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000931 |
_version_ | 1784673579465441280 |
---|---|
author | Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong Pattanapongpaiboon, Warisara Kongsomboon, Kittipong Parivisutt, Nucharee Annopawong, Kornkamol Seresirikachorn, Kasem |
author_facet | Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong Pattanapongpaiboon, Warisara Kongsomboon, Kittipong Parivisutt, Nucharee Annopawong, Kornkamol Seresirikachorn, Kasem |
author_sort | Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of manual grading of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in detection of plateau iris configuration (PIC) based on the presence of standardised ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) criteria in at least two quadrants; namely, clinical diagnosis of PIC (DxPIC). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this cross-sectional study, paired AS-OCT and UBM images were evaluated by three glaucoma specialists. AS-OCT was classified into two mechanisms, PIC versus non-PIC, of primary angle closure disease (PACD) and AS-OCT-PIC diagnostic performance was tested with DxPIC. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-nine eyes of 142 patients were enrolled for analysis, and DxPIC was found in 85 eyes (47.49%). Intraobserver agreement rates of AS-OCT classification by the graders were 0.77, 0.701 and 0.742 (all p<0.001), and interobserver agreement rates, between a senior glaucoma specialist and the other two glaucoma specialists, were 0.68 and 0.702 (all p<0.001). Plateau iris was classified in AS-OCT images by the three graders, rated 32.96%–39.1% and 24.58%–34.08% in the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. Diagnostic performance was analysed, yielding sensitivity ranging from 56.47% to 77.78%, and specificity of 48.94% to 64.29%. We applied disease prevalence of 30%, revealing positive predictive values varying from 32.16% to 44.44%, and negative predictive values of 72.4% to 85.71%. Accuracy ranged from 51.2% to 65%. Agreement between the two devices was fair, kappa range 0.31–0.351. CONCLUSION: Performance of manual grading of AS-OCT in detection of DxPIC was relatively poor; therefore, unadjusted AS-OCT does not appear to be good for manual PIC screening in PACD patients and cannot serve as a substitute for UBM in PIC detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8943722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89437222022-04-08 Diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong Pattanapongpaiboon, Warisara Kongsomboon, Kittipong Parivisutt, Nucharee Annopawong, Kornkamol Seresirikachorn, Kasem BMJ Open Ophthalmol Glaucoma OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of manual grading of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in detection of plateau iris configuration (PIC) based on the presence of standardised ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) criteria in at least two quadrants; namely, clinical diagnosis of PIC (DxPIC). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this cross-sectional study, paired AS-OCT and UBM images were evaluated by three glaucoma specialists. AS-OCT was classified into two mechanisms, PIC versus non-PIC, of primary angle closure disease (PACD) and AS-OCT-PIC diagnostic performance was tested with DxPIC. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-nine eyes of 142 patients were enrolled for analysis, and DxPIC was found in 85 eyes (47.49%). Intraobserver agreement rates of AS-OCT classification by the graders were 0.77, 0.701 and 0.742 (all p<0.001), and interobserver agreement rates, between a senior glaucoma specialist and the other two glaucoma specialists, were 0.68 and 0.702 (all p<0.001). Plateau iris was classified in AS-OCT images by the three graders, rated 32.96%–39.1% and 24.58%–34.08% in the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. Diagnostic performance was analysed, yielding sensitivity ranging from 56.47% to 77.78%, and specificity of 48.94% to 64.29%. We applied disease prevalence of 30%, revealing positive predictive values varying from 32.16% to 44.44%, and negative predictive values of 72.4% to 85.71%. Accuracy ranged from 51.2% to 65%. Agreement between the two devices was fair, kappa range 0.31–0.351. CONCLUSION: Performance of manual grading of AS-OCT in detection of DxPIC was relatively poor; therefore, unadjusted AS-OCT does not appear to be good for manual PIC screening in PACD patients and cannot serve as a substitute for UBM in PIC detection. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8943722/ /pubmed/35402728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000931 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Glaucoma Wanichwecharungruang, Boonsong Pattanapongpaiboon, Warisara Kongsomboon, Kittipong Parivisutt, Nucharee Annopawong, Kornkamol Seresirikachorn, Kasem Diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris |
title | Diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris |
title_full | Diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris |
title_short | Diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris |
topic | Glaucoma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanichwecharungruangboonsong diagnosticperformanceofanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyindetectingplateauiris AT pattanapongpaiboonwarisara diagnosticperformanceofanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyindetectingplateauiris AT kongsomboonkittipong diagnosticperformanceofanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyindetectingplateauiris AT parivisuttnucharee diagnosticperformanceofanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyindetectingplateauiris AT annopawongkornkamol diagnosticperformanceofanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyindetectingplateauiris AT seresirikachornkasem diagnosticperformanceofanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyindetectingplateauiris |