Fostering gender equality and reproductive and sexual health among adolescents: results from a quasi-experimental study in Northern Uganda

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the Gender Roles, Equality and Transformations (GREAT) intervention: a narrative-based, resource-light, life-stage tailored intervention package designed to promote gender-equitable attitudes and behaviours, and improve sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and gender-based violence (GBV) outcomes among adolescents and their communities. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional evaluation study, using propensity score matching combined with difference-in-difference estimation. SETTING: Two postconflict communities in Lira and Amuru districts in Northern Uganda. PARTICIPANTS: Male and female unmarried adolescents (10–14 years, 15–19 years), married adolescents (15–19 years) and adults (over the age of 19 years) were selected using a stratified, two-stage cluster sample of primary and secondary schools and households (baseline: n=2464, endline: n=2449). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Inequitable gender attitudes and behaviours; GBV; and SRH knowledge and behaviours. RESULTS: Statistically significant intervention effects were seen across all three outcomes—gender equity, GBV and SRH—among older and newly married adolescents and adults. Among older adolescents, intervention effects include shifts on: inequitable gender attitudes scale score: −4.2 points ((95% CI −7.1 to –1.4), p<0.05); Inequitable household roles scale score: −11.8 ((95% CI −15.6to –7.9), p<0.05); Inequitable attitudes towards GBV scale: −1.9 ((95% CI −5.0 to –0.2), p<0.05); per cent of boys who sexually assaulted a girl in past 3 months: −7.7 ((95% CI −13.1 to –2.3), p<0.05); inequitable SRH attitudes scale: −10.1 ((95% CI −12.9 to –7.3), p<0.05). Among married adolescents, intervention effects include shifts on: Inequitable household roles scale score: −6.5 ((95% CI −10.8 to –2.2), p<0.05); inequitable attitudes towards GBV scale: −4.7 ((95% CI −9.8 to –0.3), p<0.05); per cent who reacted violently to their partner: −15.7 ((95% CI −27.1 to –4.4), p<0.05); inequitable SRH attitudes scale: −12.9 ((95% CI −17.3 to –8.5), p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The GREAT intervention model demonstrates the promise of a resource-light, life-stage tailored programme that employs culturally appropriate, participatory and narrative-based techniques to advance gender equity and adolescent health. This type of programming contributes towards reductions in GBV and improved adolescent SRH outcomes.