Cargando…

Differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin

Methodological advances in conformation capture techniques have fundamentally changed our understanding of chromatin architecture. However, the nanoscale organization of chromatin and its cell-to-cell variance are less studied. Analyzing genome-wide data from 733 human cell and tissue samples, we id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandstetter, Katharina, Zülske, Tilo, Ragoczy, Tobias, Hörl, David, Guirao-Ortiz, Miguel, Steinek, Clemens, Barnes, Toby, Stumberger, Gabriela, Schwach, Jonathan, Haugen, Eric, Rynes, Eric, Korber, Philipp, Stamatoyannopoulos, John A., Leonhardt, Heinrich, Wedemann, Gero, Harz, Hartmann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Biophysical Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2022.02.009
_version_ 1784673594314326016
author Brandstetter, Katharina
Zülske, Tilo
Ragoczy, Tobias
Hörl, David
Guirao-Ortiz, Miguel
Steinek, Clemens
Barnes, Toby
Stumberger, Gabriela
Schwach, Jonathan
Haugen, Eric
Rynes, Eric
Korber, Philipp
Stamatoyannopoulos, John A.
Leonhardt, Heinrich
Wedemann, Gero
Harz, Hartmann
author_facet Brandstetter, Katharina
Zülske, Tilo
Ragoczy, Tobias
Hörl, David
Guirao-Ortiz, Miguel
Steinek, Clemens
Barnes, Toby
Stumberger, Gabriela
Schwach, Jonathan
Haugen, Eric
Rynes, Eric
Korber, Philipp
Stamatoyannopoulos, John A.
Leonhardt, Heinrich
Wedemann, Gero
Harz, Hartmann
author_sort Brandstetter, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Methodological advances in conformation capture techniques have fundamentally changed our understanding of chromatin architecture. However, the nanoscale organization of chromatin and its cell-to-cell variance are less studied. Analyzing genome-wide data from 733 human cell and tissue samples, we identified 2 prototypical regions that exhibit high or absent hypersensitivity to deoxyribonuclease I, respectively. These regulatory active or inactive regions were examined in the lymphoblast cell line K562 by using high-throughput super-resolution microscopy. In both regions, we systematically measured the physical distance of 2 fluorescence in situ hybridization spots spaced by only 5 kb of DNA. Unexpectedly, the resulting distance distributions range from very compact to almost elongated configurations of more than 200-nm length for both the active and inactive regions. Monte Carlo simulations of a coarse-grained model of these chromatin regions based on published data of nucleosome occupancy in K562 cells were performed to understand the underlying mechanisms. There was no parameter set for the simulation model that can explain the microscopically measured distance distributions. Obviously, the chromatin state given by the strength of internucleosomal interaction, nucleosome occupancy, or amount of histone H1 differs from cell to cell, which results in the observed broad distance distributions. This large variability was not expected, especially in inactive regions. The results for the mechanisms for different distance distributions on this scale are important for understanding the contacts that mediate gene regulation. Microscopic measurements show that the inactive region investigated here is expected to be embedded in a more compact chromatin environment. The simulation results of this region require an increase in the strength of internucleosomal interactions. It may be speculated that the higher density of chromatin is caused by the increased internucleosomal interaction strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8943813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Biophysical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89438132023-03-15 Differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin Brandstetter, Katharina Zülske, Tilo Ragoczy, Tobias Hörl, David Guirao-Ortiz, Miguel Steinek, Clemens Barnes, Toby Stumberger, Gabriela Schwach, Jonathan Haugen, Eric Rynes, Eric Korber, Philipp Stamatoyannopoulos, John A. Leonhardt, Heinrich Wedemann, Gero Harz, Hartmann Biophys J Articles Methodological advances in conformation capture techniques have fundamentally changed our understanding of chromatin architecture. However, the nanoscale organization of chromatin and its cell-to-cell variance are less studied. Analyzing genome-wide data from 733 human cell and tissue samples, we identified 2 prototypical regions that exhibit high or absent hypersensitivity to deoxyribonuclease I, respectively. These regulatory active or inactive regions were examined in the lymphoblast cell line K562 by using high-throughput super-resolution microscopy. In both regions, we systematically measured the physical distance of 2 fluorescence in situ hybridization spots spaced by only 5 kb of DNA. Unexpectedly, the resulting distance distributions range from very compact to almost elongated configurations of more than 200-nm length for both the active and inactive regions. Monte Carlo simulations of a coarse-grained model of these chromatin regions based on published data of nucleosome occupancy in K562 cells were performed to understand the underlying mechanisms. There was no parameter set for the simulation model that can explain the microscopically measured distance distributions. Obviously, the chromatin state given by the strength of internucleosomal interaction, nucleosome occupancy, or amount of histone H1 differs from cell to cell, which results in the observed broad distance distributions. This large variability was not expected, especially in inactive regions. The results for the mechanisms for different distance distributions on this scale are important for understanding the contacts that mediate gene regulation. Microscopic measurements show that the inactive region investigated here is expected to be embedded in a more compact chromatin environment. The simulation results of this region require an increase in the strength of internucleosomal interactions. It may be speculated that the higher density of chromatin is caused by the increased internucleosomal interaction strength. The Biophysical Society 2022-03-15 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8943813/ /pubmed/35150617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2022.02.009 Text en © 2022 Biophysical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Brandstetter, Katharina
Zülske, Tilo
Ragoczy, Tobias
Hörl, David
Guirao-Ortiz, Miguel
Steinek, Clemens
Barnes, Toby
Stumberger, Gabriela
Schwach, Jonathan
Haugen, Eric
Rynes, Eric
Korber, Philipp
Stamatoyannopoulos, John A.
Leonhardt, Heinrich
Wedemann, Gero
Harz, Hartmann
Differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin
title Differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin
title_full Differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin
title_fullStr Differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin
title_full_unstemmed Differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin
title_short Differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin
title_sort differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2022.02.009
work_keys_str_mv AT brandstetterkatharina differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT zulsketilo differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT ragoczytobias differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT horldavid differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT guiraoortizmiguel differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT steinekclemens differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT barnestoby differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT stumbergergabriela differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT schwachjonathan differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT haugeneric differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT ryneseric differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT korberphilipp differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT stamatoyannopoulosjohna differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT leonhardtheinrich differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT wedemanngero differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin
AT harzhartmann differencesinnanoscaleorganizationofregulatoryactiveandinactivehumanchromatin