Cargando…
Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is seen as a win–win situation for governments. It is argued that SSB taxes are relatively easy to implement from a practical perspective compared to for example other nutrition policies. However, the implementation of SSB taxation laws does not happen by itsel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3 |
_version_ | 1784673635854712832 |
---|---|
author | Forberger, Sarah Reisch, Lucia Meshkovska, Biljana Lobczowska, Karolina Scheller, Daniel Alexander Wendt, Janine Christianson, Lara Frense, Jennifer Steinacker, Jürgen Michael Luszczynska, Aleksandra Zeeb, Hajo |
author_facet | Forberger, Sarah Reisch, Lucia Meshkovska, Biljana Lobczowska, Karolina Scheller, Daniel Alexander Wendt, Janine Christianson, Lara Frense, Jennifer Steinacker, Jürgen Michael Luszczynska, Aleksandra Zeeb, Hajo |
author_sort | Forberger, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is seen as a win–win situation for governments. It is argued that SSB taxes are relatively easy to implement from a practical perspective compared to for example other nutrition policies. However, the implementation of SSB taxation laws does not happen by itself. Therefore, this work examines implementation processes for SSB taxation in terms of (1) pre-implementation context, (2) taxation instruments used and (3) interactions in the implementation process. Ten databases and grey literature were systematically searched for studies reporting on SSB taxation implementation processes up to February 2020. All studies (N = 1248) were screened independently by two reviewers according to predefined criteria. The selection of variables to be extracted was based on the policy cycle heuristic and informed by intervention implementation research. Information on the process of implementing SSB taxation is limited. Only six cases based on three publications were identified, indicating a gap in this research area. SSB taxation implementation was accomplished by hiring a subcontractor for the implementation or using pre-existing tax collection structures. Political and public support within the implementation process seems to be supportive for the city of Berkeley and for Portugal but was not reported for the Pacific Islands. However, the existing data are very limited, and further research on SSB taxation implementation processes is needed to determine whether the aim of the policy and the envisaged outcome are linked in practice. Registration The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/7w84q/) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8944035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89440352022-03-25 Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review Forberger, Sarah Reisch, Lucia Meshkovska, Biljana Lobczowska, Karolina Scheller, Daniel Alexander Wendt, Janine Christianson, Lara Frense, Jennifer Steinacker, Jürgen Michael Luszczynska, Aleksandra Zeeb, Hajo Health Res Policy Syst Review Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is seen as a win–win situation for governments. It is argued that SSB taxes are relatively easy to implement from a practical perspective compared to for example other nutrition policies. However, the implementation of SSB taxation laws does not happen by itself. Therefore, this work examines implementation processes for SSB taxation in terms of (1) pre-implementation context, (2) taxation instruments used and (3) interactions in the implementation process. Ten databases and grey literature were systematically searched for studies reporting on SSB taxation implementation processes up to February 2020. All studies (N = 1248) were screened independently by two reviewers according to predefined criteria. The selection of variables to be extracted was based on the policy cycle heuristic and informed by intervention implementation research. Information on the process of implementing SSB taxation is limited. Only six cases based on three publications were identified, indicating a gap in this research area. SSB taxation implementation was accomplished by hiring a subcontractor for the implementation or using pre-existing tax collection structures. Political and public support within the implementation process seems to be supportive for the city of Berkeley and for Portugal but was not reported for the Pacific Islands. However, the existing data are very limited, and further research on SSB taxation implementation processes is needed to determine whether the aim of the policy and the envisaged outcome are linked in practice. Registration The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/7w84q/) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3. BioMed Central 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8944035/ /pubmed/35331245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Forberger, Sarah Reisch, Lucia Meshkovska, Biljana Lobczowska, Karolina Scheller, Daniel Alexander Wendt, Janine Christianson, Lara Frense, Jennifer Steinacker, Jürgen Michael Luszczynska, Aleksandra Zeeb, Hajo Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review |
title | Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review |
title_full | Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review |
title_short | Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review |
title_sort | sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forbergersarah sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT reischlucia sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT meshkovskabiljana sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT lobczowskakarolina sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT schellerdanielalexander sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT wendtjanine sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT christiansonlara sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT frensejennifer sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT steinackerjurgenmichael sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT luszczynskaaleksandra sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT zeebhajo sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview AT sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview |