Cargando…

Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review

Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is seen as a win–win situation for governments. It is argued that SSB taxes are relatively easy to implement from a practical perspective compared to for example other nutrition policies. However, the implementation of SSB taxation laws does not happen by itsel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forberger, Sarah, Reisch, Lucia, Meshkovska, Biljana, Lobczowska, Karolina, Scheller, Daniel Alexander, Wendt, Janine, Christianson, Lara, Frense, Jennifer, Steinacker, Jürgen Michael, Luszczynska, Aleksandra, Zeeb, Hajo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3
_version_ 1784673635854712832
author Forberger, Sarah
Reisch, Lucia
Meshkovska, Biljana
Lobczowska, Karolina
Scheller, Daniel Alexander
Wendt, Janine
Christianson, Lara
Frense, Jennifer
Steinacker, Jürgen Michael
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Zeeb, Hajo
author_facet Forberger, Sarah
Reisch, Lucia
Meshkovska, Biljana
Lobczowska, Karolina
Scheller, Daniel Alexander
Wendt, Janine
Christianson, Lara
Frense, Jennifer
Steinacker, Jürgen Michael
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Zeeb, Hajo
author_sort Forberger, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is seen as a win–win situation for governments. It is argued that SSB taxes are relatively easy to implement from a practical perspective compared to for example other nutrition policies. However, the implementation of SSB taxation laws does not happen by itself. Therefore, this work examines implementation processes for SSB taxation in terms of (1) pre-implementation context, (2) taxation instruments used and (3) interactions in the implementation process. Ten databases and grey literature were systematically searched for studies reporting on SSB taxation implementation processes up to February 2020. All studies (N = 1248) were screened independently by two reviewers according to predefined criteria. The selection of variables to be extracted was based on the policy cycle heuristic and informed by intervention implementation research. Information on the process of implementing SSB taxation is limited. Only six cases based on three publications were identified, indicating a gap in this research area. SSB taxation implementation was accomplished by hiring a subcontractor for the implementation or using pre-existing tax collection structures. Political and public support within the implementation process seems to be supportive for the city of Berkeley and for Portugal but was not reported for the Pacific Islands. However, the existing data are very limited, and further research on SSB taxation implementation processes is needed to determine whether the aim of the policy and the envisaged outcome are linked in practice. Registration The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/7w84q/) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8944035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89440352022-03-25 Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review Forberger, Sarah Reisch, Lucia Meshkovska, Biljana Lobczowska, Karolina Scheller, Daniel Alexander Wendt, Janine Christianson, Lara Frense, Jennifer Steinacker, Jürgen Michael Luszczynska, Aleksandra Zeeb, Hajo Health Res Policy Syst Review Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is seen as a win–win situation for governments. It is argued that SSB taxes are relatively easy to implement from a practical perspective compared to for example other nutrition policies. However, the implementation of SSB taxation laws does not happen by itself. Therefore, this work examines implementation processes for SSB taxation in terms of (1) pre-implementation context, (2) taxation instruments used and (3) interactions in the implementation process. Ten databases and grey literature were systematically searched for studies reporting on SSB taxation implementation processes up to February 2020. All studies (N = 1248) were screened independently by two reviewers according to predefined criteria. The selection of variables to be extracted was based on the policy cycle heuristic and informed by intervention implementation research. Information on the process of implementing SSB taxation is limited. Only six cases based on three publications were identified, indicating a gap in this research area. SSB taxation implementation was accomplished by hiring a subcontractor for the implementation or using pre-existing tax collection structures. Political and public support within the implementation process seems to be supportive for the city of Berkeley and for Portugal but was not reported for the Pacific Islands. However, the existing data are very limited, and further research on SSB taxation implementation processes is needed to determine whether the aim of the policy and the envisaged outcome are linked in practice. Registration The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/7w84q/) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3. BioMed Central 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8944035/ /pubmed/35331245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Forberger, Sarah
Reisch, Lucia
Meshkovska, Biljana
Lobczowska, Karolina
Scheller, Daniel Alexander
Wendt, Janine
Christianson, Lara
Frense, Jennifer
Steinacker, Jürgen Michael
Luszczynska, Aleksandra
Zeeb, Hajo
Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review
title Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review
title_full Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review
title_fullStr Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review
title_short Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review
title_sort sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3
work_keys_str_mv AT forbergersarah sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT reischlucia sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT meshkovskabiljana sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT lobczowskakarolina sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT schellerdanielalexander sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT wendtjanine sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT christiansonlara sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT frensejennifer sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT steinackerjurgenmichael sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT luszczynskaaleksandra sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT zeebhajo sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview
AT sugarsweetenedbeveragetaximplementationprocessesresultsofascopingreview