Cargando…

Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND: In canine leishmaniosis (CanL) endemic areas, pathologists often receive skin biopsies for testing with histopathologic findings suggestive—but not conclusive for a definitive diagnosis—of CanL lesions. I the absence of data on the infective status of animals, the diagnosis can therefore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porcellato, Ilaria, Morganti, Giulia, Antognoni, Maria Teresa, Walczak, Katarzyna Małgorzata, De Arcangeli, Stefano, Furlanello, Tommaso, Quattrone, Cristina Bianca, Veronesi, Fabrizia, Brachelente, Chiara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05218-6
_version_ 1784673647002124288
author Porcellato, Ilaria
Morganti, Giulia
Antognoni, Maria Teresa
Walczak, Katarzyna Małgorzata
De Arcangeli, Stefano
Furlanello, Tommaso
Quattrone, Cristina Bianca
Veronesi, Fabrizia
Brachelente, Chiara
author_facet Porcellato, Ilaria
Morganti, Giulia
Antognoni, Maria Teresa
Walczak, Katarzyna Małgorzata
De Arcangeli, Stefano
Furlanello, Tommaso
Quattrone, Cristina Bianca
Veronesi, Fabrizia
Brachelente, Chiara
author_sort Porcellato, Ilaria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In canine leishmaniosis (CanL) endemic areas, pathologists often receive skin biopsies for testing with histopathologic findings suggestive—but not conclusive for a definitive diagnosis—of CanL lesions. I the absence of data on the infective status of animals, the diagnosis can therefore be challenging. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the ability of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods to detect Leishmania infection in skin biopsies with a histopathologic diagnosis of lymphoplasmacytic/histiocytic and/or granulomatous dermatitis and to correlate the pattern, depth and severity of the histopathologic lesions with the parasite load detected by qPCR and IHC. METHODS: Thirty formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin samples were evaluated by hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) staining, IHC, conventional PCR (cPCR) and qPCR. The severity, pattern and depth of the dermal inflammation and parasite load were graded. RESULTS: Leishmania was detected by H&E staining in 8/30 sections (26.66%) and by IHC in 14/30 samples (46.66%). Parasite DNA was detected in 14/30 samples (46.66%) by cPCR and in 21/30 samples (70%) by qPCR, with an extremely variable parasite load (1.32–62.700 copies). The level of agreement was fair between H&E staining and cPCR (κ = 0.32), and moderate between H&E staining and IHC (κ = 0.58). The level of agreement between IHC and cPCR was good (κ = 0.65); between IHC and qPCR, moderate (κ = 0.41); and between cPCR and qPCR, fair (κ = 0.28). A significant association was found between the severity of dermal inflammation and the parasitic skin load by IHC, although with weak linear correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underlines the difficulty of obtaining a definitive diagnosis of CanL cutaneous lesions, even with the most accurate diagnostic tests currently available. Based on our results, no single test is suitable on its own for the diagnosis of cutaneous lesions caused by Leishmania. However, in the presence of a moderate/severe lymphoplasmacytic/histiocytic and/or granulomatous dermatitis, we suggest performing IHC, as in our study this technique proved to be the method with the highest discriminatory power to estimate the role of the parasite in skin lesions. In mild lesions, IHC loses its discriminatory power and should be effectively combined with techniques such as qPCR. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8944085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89440852022-03-25 Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study Porcellato, Ilaria Morganti, Giulia Antognoni, Maria Teresa Walczak, Katarzyna Małgorzata De Arcangeli, Stefano Furlanello, Tommaso Quattrone, Cristina Bianca Veronesi, Fabrizia Brachelente, Chiara Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: In canine leishmaniosis (CanL) endemic areas, pathologists often receive skin biopsies for testing with histopathologic findings suggestive—but not conclusive for a definitive diagnosis—of CanL lesions. I the absence of data on the infective status of animals, the diagnosis can therefore be challenging. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the ability of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods to detect Leishmania infection in skin biopsies with a histopathologic diagnosis of lymphoplasmacytic/histiocytic and/or granulomatous dermatitis and to correlate the pattern, depth and severity of the histopathologic lesions with the parasite load detected by qPCR and IHC. METHODS: Thirty formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin samples were evaluated by hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) staining, IHC, conventional PCR (cPCR) and qPCR. The severity, pattern and depth of the dermal inflammation and parasite load were graded. RESULTS: Leishmania was detected by H&E staining in 8/30 sections (26.66%) and by IHC in 14/30 samples (46.66%). Parasite DNA was detected in 14/30 samples (46.66%) by cPCR and in 21/30 samples (70%) by qPCR, with an extremely variable parasite load (1.32–62.700 copies). The level of agreement was fair between H&E staining and cPCR (κ = 0.32), and moderate between H&E staining and IHC (κ = 0.58). The level of agreement between IHC and cPCR was good (κ = 0.65); between IHC and qPCR, moderate (κ = 0.41); and between cPCR and qPCR, fair (κ = 0.28). A significant association was found between the severity of dermal inflammation and the parasitic skin load by IHC, although with weak linear correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underlines the difficulty of obtaining a definitive diagnosis of CanL cutaneous lesions, even with the most accurate diagnostic tests currently available. Based on our results, no single test is suitable on its own for the diagnosis of cutaneous lesions caused by Leishmania. However, in the presence of a moderate/severe lymphoplasmacytic/histiocytic and/or granulomatous dermatitis, we suggest performing IHC, as in our study this technique proved to be the method with the highest discriminatory power to estimate the role of the parasite in skin lesions. In mild lesions, IHC loses its discriminatory power and should be effectively combined with techniques such as qPCR. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8944085/ /pubmed/35331318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05218-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Porcellato, Ilaria
Morganti, Giulia
Antognoni, Maria Teresa
Walczak, Katarzyna Małgorzata
De Arcangeli, Stefano
Furlanello, Tommaso
Quattrone, Cristina Bianca
Veronesi, Fabrizia
Brachelente, Chiara
Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study
title Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study
title_full Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study
title_fullStr Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study
title_short Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study
title_sort comparison of immunohistochemical and qpcr methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05218-6
work_keys_str_mv AT porcellatoilaria comparisonofimmunohistochemicalandqpcrmethodsfromgranulomatousdermatitislesionsfordetectionofleishmaniaindogslivinginendemicareasapreliminarystudy
AT morgantigiulia comparisonofimmunohistochemicalandqpcrmethodsfromgranulomatousdermatitislesionsfordetectionofleishmaniaindogslivinginendemicareasapreliminarystudy
AT antognonimariateresa comparisonofimmunohistochemicalandqpcrmethodsfromgranulomatousdermatitislesionsfordetectionofleishmaniaindogslivinginendemicareasapreliminarystudy
AT walczakkatarzynamałgorzata comparisonofimmunohistochemicalandqpcrmethodsfromgranulomatousdermatitislesionsfordetectionofleishmaniaindogslivinginendemicareasapreliminarystudy
AT dearcangelistefano comparisonofimmunohistochemicalandqpcrmethodsfromgranulomatousdermatitislesionsfordetectionofleishmaniaindogslivinginendemicareasapreliminarystudy
AT furlanellotommaso comparisonofimmunohistochemicalandqpcrmethodsfromgranulomatousdermatitislesionsfordetectionofleishmaniaindogslivinginendemicareasapreliminarystudy
AT quattronecristinabianca comparisonofimmunohistochemicalandqpcrmethodsfromgranulomatousdermatitislesionsfordetectionofleishmaniaindogslivinginendemicareasapreliminarystudy
AT veronesifabrizia comparisonofimmunohistochemicalandqpcrmethodsfromgranulomatousdermatitislesionsfordetectionofleishmaniaindogslivinginendemicareasapreliminarystudy
AT brachelentechiara comparisonofimmunohistochemicalandqpcrmethodsfromgranulomatousdermatitislesionsfordetectionofleishmaniaindogslivinginendemicareasapreliminarystudy