Cargando…
The abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach versus the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a multicenter prospective, open, parallel, and randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: To date, Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (ST-II AEG) can be removed radically utilizing either the abdominal-transhiatal (TH) or the right thoracoabdominal (RTA) approaches. Because of a paucity of high-quality direct evidence, the appropriate surgical appr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09375-w |
_version_ | 1784673658317307904 |
---|---|
author | Song, Qiying Li, Xiongguang Wu, Di Li, Shuo Xie, Tianyu Lu, Yixun Zhang, Liyu Xu, Ziyao Liu, Lu Guo, Xin Wang, Xinxin |
author_facet | Song, Qiying Li, Xiongguang Wu, Di Li, Shuo Xie, Tianyu Lu, Yixun Zhang, Liyu Xu, Ziyao Liu, Lu Guo, Xin Wang, Xinxin |
author_sort | Song, Qiying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (ST-II AEG) can be removed radically utilizing either the abdominal-transhiatal (TH) or the right thoracoabdominal (RTA) approaches. Because of a paucity of high-quality direct evidence, the appropriate surgical approach for ST-II AEG remains debatable. In the present, only several retrospective studies are available, representing ambiguous results. Thus, prospective randomized clinical trials are demanded to compare the survival, oncological outcomes, safety and efficiency and life quality between the TH and RTA approach in patients with resectable AEG of Siewert type II. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, open, randomized, and parallel controlled study named S2AEG will be conducted. Three hundred and twelve patients who match the inclusion criteria but not the exclusion criteria will be participating in the trial and randomly divided into the TH (156) and RTA (156) cohorts. The primary efficacy endpoint is the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) following the operation. The rate of R0-resection, the number and site of lymph nodes infiltrated and dissected, postoperative complications, hospital days and life quality are the second endpoints. DISCUSSION: This study is the first prospectively randomized controlled trial aiming to compare the surgical outcomes between TH and RTA approaches in patients with resectable ST-II AEG. It is hypothesized that patients in the TH cohort would harvest equivalent oncological results and survival while maintaining acceptable life quality when compared to patients in the RTA cohort. Our findings will provide high-level clinical evidence for clinical decision-making on the appropriate surgical approach for patients with ST-II AEG. Embarked in November 2019, this research will be completed 3 years after the final participant’s enrolment date. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial.gov ID: NCT04910789 May 29, 2021. Name: S2AEG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8944144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89441442022-03-25 The abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach versus the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a multicenter prospective, open, parallel, and randomized controlled trial Song, Qiying Li, Xiongguang Wu, Di Li, Shuo Xie, Tianyu Lu, Yixun Zhang, Liyu Xu, Ziyao Liu, Lu Guo, Xin Wang, Xinxin BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: To date, Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (ST-II AEG) can be removed radically utilizing either the abdominal-transhiatal (TH) or the right thoracoabdominal (RTA) approaches. Because of a paucity of high-quality direct evidence, the appropriate surgical approach for ST-II AEG remains debatable. In the present, only several retrospective studies are available, representing ambiguous results. Thus, prospective randomized clinical trials are demanded to compare the survival, oncological outcomes, safety and efficiency and life quality between the TH and RTA approach in patients with resectable AEG of Siewert type II. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, open, randomized, and parallel controlled study named S2AEG will be conducted. Three hundred and twelve patients who match the inclusion criteria but not the exclusion criteria will be participating in the trial and randomly divided into the TH (156) and RTA (156) cohorts. The primary efficacy endpoint is the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) following the operation. The rate of R0-resection, the number and site of lymph nodes infiltrated and dissected, postoperative complications, hospital days and life quality are the second endpoints. DISCUSSION: This study is the first prospectively randomized controlled trial aiming to compare the surgical outcomes between TH and RTA approaches in patients with resectable ST-II AEG. It is hypothesized that patients in the TH cohort would harvest equivalent oncological results and survival while maintaining acceptable life quality when compared to patients in the RTA cohort. Our findings will provide high-level clinical evidence for clinical decision-making on the appropriate surgical approach for patients with ST-II AEG. Embarked in November 2019, this research will be completed 3 years after the final participant’s enrolment date. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial.gov ID: NCT04910789 May 29, 2021. Name: S2AEG. BioMed Central 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8944144/ /pubmed/35331180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09375-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Song, Qiying Li, Xiongguang Wu, Di Li, Shuo Xie, Tianyu Lu, Yixun Zhang, Liyu Xu, Ziyao Liu, Lu Guo, Xin Wang, Xinxin The abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach versus the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a multicenter prospective, open, parallel, and randomized controlled trial |
title | The abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach versus the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a multicenter prospective, open, parallel, and randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach versus the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a multicenter prospective, open, parallel, and randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach versus the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a multicenter prospective, open, parallel, and randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach versus the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a multicenter prospective, open, parallel, and randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach versus the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a multicenter prospective, open, parallel, and randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach versus the thoracoabdominal surgical approach in siewert type ii adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: protocol for a multicenter prospective, open, parallel, and randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09375-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songqiying theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lixiongguang theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wudi theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lishuo theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xietianyu theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luyixun theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangliyu theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xuziyao theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liulu theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guoxin theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangxinxin theabdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT songqiying abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lixiongguang abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wudi abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lishuo abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xietianyu abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luyixun abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangliyu abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xuziyao abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liulu abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guoxin abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangxinxin abdominaltranshiatalsurgicalapproachversusthethoracoabdominalsurgicalapproachinsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveopenparallelandrandomizedcontrolledtrial |