Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a simple and safe interfascial plane block reported to provide good analgesia after thoracolumbar surgeries. We compared its efficacy with conventional peritubal local anesthetic infiltration following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lomate, Prashant, Jadhav, Vasudha R., Yadav, Arvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340952
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_430_19
_version_ 1784673695264931840
author Lomate, Prashant
Jadhav, Vasudha R.
Yadav, Arvind
author_facet Lomate, Prashant
Jadhav, Vasudha R.
Yadav, Arvind
author_sort Lomate, Prashant
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a simple and safe interfascial plane block reported to provide good analgesia after thoracolumbar surgeries. We compared its efficacy with conventional peritubal local anesthetic infiltration following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 adult patients posted for elective PCNL were randomly allocated into two groups. Postoperatively, Group I received ultrasound (US) guided peritubular infiltration block with 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine and Group II received US guided ESP block with 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine. The two groups were compared for the time to first rescue analgesic (Injection tramadol), number of rescue analgesic demands, total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours, VAS (rest and dynamic) scores and the adverse effects. The data were analyzed by unpaired t-test and Mann Whitney U test. RESULTS: The time to first rescue analgesic demand was significantly longer in Group II (6.93 ± 2.15 h vs. 16.21 ± 7.53 h). The VAS scores (rest and dynamic) at eight and twelve hours of measurement were significantly lower in Group II (P < 0.05). The number of analgesic demands were less in group II (2.97 ± 0.49 vs. 1.00 ± 1.05). The total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours was less in Group II (148.33 ± 24.51 mg vs. 51.92 ± 45.78 mg). CONCLUSION: ESP block is a very effective and safe technique to provide prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia following PCNL. Peritubal local anesthetic infiltration is also a reliable technique for postoperative analgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8944355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89443552022-03-25 Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy Lomate, Prashant Jadhav, Vasudha R. Yadav, Arvind J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a simple and safe interfascial plane block reported to provide good analgesia after thoracolumbar surgeries. We compared its efficacy with conventional peritubal local anesthetic infiltration following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 adult patients posted for elective PCNL were randomly allocated into two groups. Postoperatively, Group I received ultrasound (US) guided peritubular infiltration block with 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine and Group II received US guided ESP block with 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine. The two groups were compared for the time to first rescue analgesic (Injection tramadol), number of rescue analgesic demands, total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours, VAS (rest and dynamic) scores and the adverse effects. The data were analyzed by unpaired t-test and Mann Whitney U test. RESULTS: The time to first rescue analgesic demand was significantly longer in Group II (6.93 ± 2.15 h vs. 16.21 ± 7.53 h). The VAS scores (rest and dynamic) at eight and twelve hours of measurement were significantly lower in Group II (P < 0.05). The number of analgesic demands were less in group II (2.97 ± 0.49 vs. 1.00 ± 1.05). The total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours was less in Group II (148.33 ± 24.51 mg vs. 51.92 ± 45.78 mg). CONCLUSION: ESP block is a very effective and safe technique to provide prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia following PCNL. Peritubal local anesthetic infiltration is also a reliable technique for postoperative analgesia. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8944355/ /pubmed/35340952 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_430_19 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lomate, Prashant
Jadhav, Vasudha R.
Yadav, Arvind
Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_short Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340952
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_430_19
work_keys_str_mv AT lomateprashant comparisonoftheefficacyoferectorspinaeplaneblockandperitubalinfiltrationoflevobupivacaineforpostoperativeanalgesiafollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT jadhavvasudhar comparisonoftheefficacyoferectorspinaeplaneblockandperitubalinfiltrationoflevobupivacaineforpostoperativeanalgesiafollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT yadavarvind comparisonoftheefficacyoferectorspinaeplaneblockandperitubalinfiltrationoflevobupivacaineforpostoperativeanalgesiafollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy