Cargando…

A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A number of supraglottic airways have been developed to facilitate the passage of tracheal tubes. Various studies have been conducted using air-Q ILA as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. Ambu AuraGain is a newer 3(rd) generation supraglottic airway device. There are limited...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lal, Jatin, Bansal, Teena, Somesh, Somesh, Jain, Mamta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340953
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_387_19
_version_ 1784673702055510016
author Lal, Jatin
Bansal, Teena
Somesh, Somesh
Jain, Mamta
author_facet Lal, Jatin
Bansal, Teena
Somesh, Somesh
Jain, Mamta
author_sort Lal, Jatin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A number of supraglottic airways have been developed to facilitate the passage of tracheal tubes. Various studies have been conducted using air-Q ILA as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. Ambu AuraGain is a newer 3(rd) generation supraglottic airway device. There are limited studies available in literature on blind tracheal intubation through the Ambu AuraGain. This study was designed to compare air-Q ILA and Ambu AuraGain as conduit for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, belonging to ASA physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups. Group A (n = 60) included blind intubation through air-Q ILA using Parker flex tip tube and group B (n = 60) included blind intubation through Ambu AuraGain using Parker flex tip tube. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate was significantly more in group A (P < 0.001). Intubation was significantly easy in group A as compared to group B (P < 0.001). The mean time for insertion of endotracheal tube through air-Q ILA in group A was 17.85 ± 6.25 sec while in group B it was 30.19 ± 10.97 sec (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Air-Q ILA resulted in significantly more success rate and ease of intubation as compared to Ambu AuraGain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8944383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89443832022-03-25 A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube Lal, Jatin Bansal, Teena Somesh, Somesh Jain, Mamta J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A number of supraglottic airways have been developed to facilitate the passage of tracheal tubes. Various studies have been conducted using air-Q ILA as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. Ambu AuraGain is a newer 3(rd) generation supraglottic airway device. There are limited studies available in literature on blind tracheal intubation through the Ambu AuraGain. This study was designed to compare air-Q ILA and Ambu AuraGain as conduit for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, belonging to ASA physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups. Group A (n = 60) included blind intubation through air-Q ILA using Parker flex tip tube and group B (n = 60) included blind intubation through Ambu AuraGain using Parker flex tip tube. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate was significantly more in group A (P < 0.001). Intubation was significantly easy in group A as compared to group B (P < 0.001). The mean time for insertion of endotracheal tube through air-Q ILA in group A was 17.85 ± 6.25 sec while in group B it was 30.19 ± 10.97 sec (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Air-Q ILA resulted in significantly more success rate and ease of intubation as compared to Ambu AuraGain. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8944383/ /pubmed/35340953 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_387_19 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lal, Jatin
Bansal, Teena
Somesh, Somesh
Jain, Mamta
A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube
title A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube
title_full A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube
title_fullStr A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube
title_full_unstemmed A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube
title_short A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube
title_sort study to compare air-q intubating laryngeal airway with ambu auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using parker flex tip tube
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340953
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_387_19
work_keys_str_mv AT laljatin astudytocompareairqintubatinglaryngealairwaywithambuauragainlaryngealmaskforblindtrachealintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT bansalteena astudytocompareairqintubatinglaryngealairwaywithambuauragainlaryngealmaskforblindtrachealintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT someshsomesh astudytocompareairqintubatinglaryngealairwaywithambuauragainlaryngealmaskforblindtrachealintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT jainmamta astudytocompareairqintubatinglaryngealairwaywithambuauragainlaryngealmaskforblindtrachealintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT laljatin studytocompareairqintubatinglaryngealairwaywithambuauragainlaryngealmaskforblindtrachealintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT bansalteena studytocompareairqintubatinglaryngealairwaywithambuauragainlaryngealmaskforblindtrachealintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT someshsomesh studytocompareairqintubatinglaryngealairwaywithambuauragainlaryngealmaskforblindtrachealintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT jainmamta studytocompareairqintubatinglaryngealairwaywithambuauragainlaryngealmaskforblindtrachealintubationusingparkerflextiptube