Cargando…
Intermittent treatment of BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge
Patients with melanoma receiving drugs targeting BRAF(V600E) and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinases 1 and 2 (MEK1/2) invariably develop resistance and face continued progression. Based on preclinical studies, intermittent treatment involving alternating periods of drug withdrawal and rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113535119 |
_version_ | 1784673772191612928 |
---|---|
author | Kavran, Andrew J. Stuart, Scott A. Hayashi, Kristyn R. Basken, Joel M. Brandhuber, Barbara J. Ahn, Natalie G. |
author_facet | Kavran, Andrew J. Stuart, Scott A. Hayashi, Kristyn R. Basken, Joel M. Brandhuber, Barbara J. Ahn, Natalie G. |
author_sort | Kavran, Andrew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with melanoma receiving drugs targeting BRAF(V600E) and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinases 1 and 2 (MEK1/2) invariably develop resistance and face continued progression. Based on preclinical studies, intermittent treatment involving alternating periods of drug withdrawal and rechallenge has been proposed as a method to delay the onset of resistance. The beneficial effect of intermittent treatment has been attributed to drug addiction, where drug withdrawal reduces the viability of resistant cells due to MAP kinase pathway hyperactivation. However, the mechanistic basis of the intermittent effect is incompletely understood. We show that intermittent treatment with the BRAF(V600E) inhibitor, LGX818/encorafenib, suppresses growth compared with continuous treatment in human melanoma cells engineered to express BRAF(V600E), p61-BRAF(V600E), or MEK2(C125) oncogenes. Analysis of the BRAF(V600E)-overexpressing cells shows that, while drug addiction clearly occurs, it fails to account for the advantageous effect of intermittent treatment. Instead, growth suppression is best explained by resensitization during periods of drug removal, followed by cell death after drug readdition. Continuous treatment leads to transcriptional responses prominently associated with chemoresistance in melanoma. By contrast, cells treated intermittently reveal a subset of transcripts that reverse expression between successive cycles of drug removal and rechallenge and include mediators of cell invasiveness and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. These transcripts change during periods of drug removal by adaptive switching, rather than selection pressure. Resensitization occurs against a background of sustained expression of melanoma resistance genes, producing a transcriptome distinct from that of the initial drug-naive cell state. We conclude that phenotypic plasticity leading to drug resensitization can underlie the beneficial effect of intermittent treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8944661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89446612022-09-15 Intermittent treatment of BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge Kavran, Andrew J. Stuart, Scott A. Hayashi, Kristyn R. Basken, Joel M. Brandhuber, Barbara J. Ahn, Natalie G. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Patients with melanoma receiving drugs targeting BRAF(V600E) and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinases 1 and 2 (MEK1/2) invariably develop resistance and face continued progression. Based on preclinical studies, intermittent treatment involving alternating periods of drug withdrawal and rechallenge has been proposed as a method to delay the onset of resistance. The beneficial effect of intermittent treatment has been attributed to drug addiction, where drug withdrawal reduces the viability of resistant cells due to MAP kinase pathway hyperactivation. However, the mechanistic basis of the intermittent effect is incompletely understood. We show that intermittent treatment with the BRAF(V600E) inhibitor, LGX818/encorafenib, suppresses growth compared with continuous treatment in human melanoma cells engineered to express BRAF(V600E), p61-BRAF(V600E), or MEK2(C125) oncogenes. Analysis of the BRAF(V600E)-overexpressing cells shows that, while drug addiction clearly occurs, it fails to account for the advantageous effect of intermittent treatment. Instead, growth suppression is best explained by resensitization during periods of drug removal, followed by cell death after drug readdition. Continuous treatment leads to transcriptional responses prominently associated with chemoresistance in melanoma. By contrast, cells treated intermittently reveal a subset of transcripts that reverse expression between successive cycles of drug removal and rechallenge and include mediators of cell invasiveness and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. These transcripts change during periods of drug removal by adaptive switching, rather than selection pressure. Resensitization occurs against a background of sustained expression of melanoma resistance genes, producing a transcriptome distinct from that of the initial drug-naive cell state. We conclude that phenotypic plasticity leading to drug resensitization can underlie the beneficial effect of intermittent treatment. National Academy of Sciences 2022-03-15 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8944661/ /pubmed/35290123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113535119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Biological Sciences Kavran, Andrew J. Stuart, Scott A. Hayashi, Kristyn R. Basken, Joel M. Brandhuber, Barbara J. Ahn, Natalie G. Intermittent treatment of BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge |
title | Intermittent treatment of BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge |
title_full | Intermittent treatment of BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge |
title_fullStr | Intermittent treatment of BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge |
title_full_unstemmed | Intermittent treatment of BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge |
title_short | Intermittent treatment of BRAF(V600E) melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge |
title_sort | intermittent treatment of braf(v600e) melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge |
topic | Biological Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113535119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kavranandrewj intermittenttreatmentofbrafv600emelanomacellsdelaysresistancebyadaptiveresensitizationtodrugrechallenge AT stuartscotta intermittenttreatmentofbrafv600emelanomacellsdelaysresistancebyadaptiveresensitizationtodrugrechallenge AT hayashikristynr intermittenttreatmentofbrafv600emelanomacellsdelaysresistancebyadaptiveresensitizationtodrugrechallenge AT baskenjoelm intermittenttreatmentofbrafv600emelanomacellsdelaysresistancebyadaptiveresensitizationtodrugrechallenge AT brandhuberbarbaraj intermittenttreatmentofbrafv600emelanomacellsdelaysresistancebyadaptiveresensitizationtodrugrechallenge AT ahnnatalieg intermittenttreatmentofbrafv600emelanomacellsdelaysresistancebyadaptiveresensitizationtodrugrechallenge |