Cargando…

573 Interfacility Transfers for Burn Patients with Concomitant Traumatic Injuries

INTRODUCTION: Burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries suffer increased morbidity and mortality. Complex care coordination for these patients often requires interfacility transfers. We sought to examine the outcomes for traumatically injured burn patients to identify the occurrence and asso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirkland, Kevin D, Gratton, Austin, Mentzer, Caleb, Kubasiak, John, Yon, James R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945263/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.201
_version_ 1784673916910829568
author Kirkland, Kevin D
Gratton, Austin
Mentzer, Caleb
Kubasiak, John
Yon, James R
author_facet Kirkland, Kevin D
Gratton, Austin
Mentzer, Caleb
Kubasiak, John
Yon, James R
author_sort Kirkland, Kevin D
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries suffer increased morbidity and mortality. Complex care coordination for these patients often requires interfacility transfers. We sought to examine the outcomes for traumatically injured burn patients to identify the occurrence and associated reasons for trauma system transfers in this group. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was examined from years 2007 to 2016 for 6,565,577 patients with traumatic, burn, and concomitant burn & traumatic injuries to evaluate demographic data, ED and hospital dispositions, length of ICU stay, ventilator days, mortality, and interfacility transfers. There were 5,068 patients with both traumatic and burn injuries, 145,890 patients with burn injuries, and 6,414,619 patients with traumatic injuries. Non-parametric Kruskal Wallis, analysis of variance, chi-square, Mann Whitney, and T-tests were utilized for comparisons. RESULTS: Patients were 69.1% male in the trauma/burn, 67.1% male in the burn, and 62.2% male in the trauma groups (P< 0.001). Trauma/burn patients were more often admitted to the ICU from the ED at 35.5% compared to 27.1% for burn and 19.4% for trauma (P< 0.001). ICU stay was longer for trauma/burn patients at 5.00 median days (IQR 2.00, 15.00) versus 3.00 (IQR 1.00, 10.00) for burn and 3.00 (IQR 1.00, 5.00) for trauma (P< 0.001). Trauma/burn patients had more ventilator days at 3.00 median days (IQR 1.00, 11.75) compared to 2.00 (IQR 1.00, 9.00) for burn and 2.00 (IQR 1.00, 7.00) for trauma (P< 0.001). Trauma/burn patients had increased mortality at 4.9% versus 2.5% for burn and 3.2% for trauma (P< 0.001). For hospital disposition, trauma/burn patients required more interfacility transfers 2.5% compared to 1.7% for burn and 1.3% for trauma (P< 0.001). For level 1 trauma centers, 5.5% of trauma/burn, 7.1% of burn, and 0.5% of trauma patients required interfacility transfers. For level 2 trauma centers, 29.1% of trauma/burn, 47.0% of burn, and 2.8% of trauma patients required interfacility transfers. CONCLUSIONS: Among level 1 and level 2 trauma centers, patients with only burns and burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries required more interfacility transfers, and level 2 trauma centers required more interfacility transfers for all patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8945263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89452632022-03-28 573 Interfacility Transfers for Burn Patients with Concomitant Traumatic Injuries Kirkland, Kevin D Gratton, Austin Mentzer, Caleb Kubasiak, John Yon, James R J Burn Care Res Prevention/Epidemiology/Public Health 2 INTRODUCTION: Burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries suffer increased morbidity and mortality. Complex care coordination for these patients often requires interfacility transfers. We sought to examine the outcomes for traumatically injured burn patients to identify the occurrence and associated reasons for trauma system transfers in this group. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was examined from years 2007 to 2016 for 6,565,577 patients with traumatic, burn, and concomitant burn & traumatic injuries to evaluate demographic data, ED and hospital dispositions, length of ICU stay, ventilator days, mortality, and interfacility transfers. There were 5,068 patients with both traumatic and burn injuries, 145,890 patients with burn injuries, and 6,414,619 patients with traumatic injuries. Non-parametric Kruskal Wallis, analysis of variance, chi-square, Mann Whitney, and T-tests were utilized for comparisons. RESULTS: Patients were 69.1% male in the trauma/burn, 67.1% male in the burn, and 62.2% male in the trauma groups (P< 0.001). Trauma/burn patients were more often admitted to the ICU from the ED at 35.5% compared to 27.1% for burn and 19.4% for trauma (P< 0.001). ICU stay was longer for trauma/burn patients at 5.00 median days (IQR 2.00, 15.00) versus 3.00 (IQR 1.00, 10.00) for burn and 3.00 (IQR 1.00, 5.00) for trauma (P< 0.001). Trauma/burn patients had more ventilator days at 3.00 median days (IQR 1.00, 11.75) compared to 2.00 (IQR 1.00, 9.00) for burn and 2.00 (IQR 1.00, 7.00) for trauma (P< 0.001). Trauma/burn patients had increased mortality at 4.9% versus 2.5% for burn and 3.2% for trauma (P< 0.001). For hospital disposition, trauma/burn patients required more interfacility transfers 2.5% compared to 1.7% for burn and 1.3% for trauma (P< 0.001). For level 1 trauma centers, 5.5% of trauma/burn, 7.1% of burn, and 0.5% of trauma patients required interfacility transfers. For level 2 trauma centers, 29.1% of trauma/burn, 47.0% of burn, and 2.8% of trauma patients required interfacility transfers. CONCLUSIONS: Among level 1 and level 2 trauma centers, patients with only burns and burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries required more interfacility transfers, and level 2 trauma centers required more interfacility transfers for all patients. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8945263/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.201 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Prevention/Epidemiology/Public Health 2
Kirkland, Kevin D
Gratton, Austin
Mentzer, Caleb
Kubasiak, John
Yon, James R
573 Interfacility Transfers for Burn Patients with Concomitant Traumatic Injuries
title 573 Interfacility Transfers for Burn Patients with Concomitant Traumatic Injuries
title_full 573 Interfacility Transfers for Burn Patients with Concomitant Traumatic Injuries
title_fullStr 573 Interfacility Transfers for Burn Patients with Concomitant Traumatic Injuries
title_full_unstemmed 573 Interfacility Transfers for Burn Patients with Concomitant Traumatic Injuries
title_short 573 Interfacility Transfers for Burn Patients with Concomitant Traumatic Injuries
title_sort 573 interfacility transfers for burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries
topic Prevention/Epidemiology/Public Health 2
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945263/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.201
work_keys_str_mv AT kirklandkevind 573interfacilitytransfersforburnpatientswithconcomitanttraumaticinjuries
AT grattonaustin 573interfacilitytransfersforburnpatientswithconcomitanttraumaticinjuries
AT mentzercaleb 573interfacilitytransfersforburnpatientswithconcomitanttraumaticinjuries
AT kubasiakjohn 573interfacilitytransfersforburnpatientswithconcomitanttraumaticinjuries
AT yonjamesr 573interfacilitytransfersforburnpatientswithconcomitanttraumaticinjuries