Cargando…
Assessing the Future of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy
With the advent of cancer immunotherapy, there has been a major improvement in patient’s quality of life and survival. The growth of cancer immunotherapy has dramatically changed our understanding of the basics of cancer biology and has altered the standards of care (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35327456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10030655 |
_version_ | 1784673969901666304 |
---|---|
author | Guha, Prajna Heatherton, Kara R. O’Connell, Kyle P. Alexander, Ian S. Katz, Steven C. |
author_facet | Guha, Prajna Heatherton, Kara R. O’Connell, Kyle P. Alexander, Ian S. Katz, Steven C. |
author_sort | Guha, Prajna |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the advent of cancer immunotherapy, there has been a major improvement in patient’s quality of life and survival. The growth of cancer immunotherapy has dramatically changed our understanding of the basics of cancer biology and has altered the standards of care (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) for patients. Cancer immunotherapy has generated significant excitement with the success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in particular. Clinical results using CAR-T for hematological malignancies have led to the approval of four CD19-targeted and one B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted cell therapy products by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Also, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as antibodies against Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD-1), Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have shown promising therapeutic outcomes and long-lasting clinical effect in several tumor types and patients who are refractory to other treatments. Despite these promising results, the success of cancer immunotherapy in solid tumors has been limited due to several barriers, which include immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), inefficient trafficking, and heterogeneity of tumor antigens. This is further compounded by the high intra-tumoral pressure of solid tumors, which presents an additional challenge to successfully delivering treatments to solid tumors. In this review, we will outline and propose specific approaches that may overcome these immunological and physical barriers to improve the outcomes in solid tumor patients receiving immunotherapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8945484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89454842022-03-25 Assessing the Future of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy Guha, Prajna Heatherton, Kara R. O’Connell, Kyle P. Alexander, Ian S. Katz, Steven C. Biomedicines Review With the advent of cancer immunotherapy, there has been a major improvement in patient’s quality of life and survival. The growth of cancer immunotherapy has dramatically changed our understanding of the basics of cancer biology and has altered the standards of care (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) for patients. Cancer immunotherapy has generated significant excitement with the success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in particular. Clinical results using CAR-T for hematological malignancies have led to the approval of four CD19-targeted and one B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted cell therapy products by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Also, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as antibodies against Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD-1), Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have shown promising therapeutic outcomes and long-lasting clinical effect in several tumor types and patients who are refractory to other treatments. Despite these promising results, the success of cancer immunotherapy in solid tumors has been limited due to several barriers, which include immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), inefficient trafficking, and heterogeneity of tumor antigens. This is further compounded by the high intra-tumoral pressure of solid tumors, which presents an additional challenge to successfully delivering treatments to solid tumors. In this review, we will outline and propose specific approaches that may overcome these immunological and physical barriers to improve the outcomes in solid tumor patients receiving immunotherapies. MDPI 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8945484/ /pubmed/35327456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10030655 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Guha, Prajna Heatherton, Kara R. O’Connell, Kyle P. Alexander, Ian S. Katz, Steven C. Assessing the Future of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy |
title | Assessing the Future of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy |
title_full | Assessing the Future of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy |
title_fullStr | Assessing the Future of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the Future of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy |
title_short | Assessing the Future of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy |
title_sort | assessing the future of solid tumor immunotherapy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35327456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10030655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guhaprajna assessingthefutureofsolidtumorimmunotherapy AT heathertonkarar assessingthefutureofsolidtumorimmunotherapy AT oconnellkylep assessingthefutureofsolidtumorimmunotherapy AT alexanderians assessingthefutureofsolidtumorimmunotherapy AT katzstevenc assessingthefutureofsolidtumorimmunotherapy |