Cargando…
605 Revision Surgery Following Severe Frostbite Compared to Similar Hand and Foot Burns
INTRODUCTION: Severe frostbite is associated with high levels of morbidity through loss of digits or limbs. The current practice is to salvage as much of the limb/digit as possible with the use of thrombolytic and adjuvant therapies. Sequalae from amputation can include severe nerve pain and poor wo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945515/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.233 |
_version_ | 1784673977427296256 |
---|---|
author | Coward, Alexandra Nygaard, Rachel M Endorf, Frederick W |
author_facet | Coward, Alexandra Nygaard, Rachel M Endorf, Frederick W |
author_sort | Coward, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Severe frostbite is associated with high levels of morbidity through loss of digits or limbs. The current practice is to salvage as much of the limb/digit as possible with the use of thrombolytic and adjuvant therapies. Sequalae from amputation can include severe nerve pain and poor wound healing requiring revision surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of revision surgery after primary amputation and compare this to revision surgery in isolated hand/foot burns. METHODS: Frostbite and burn patients from 2006 to 2019 were identified in the prospectively maintained database at a single urban burn and trauma center. Patients with primary amputations related to isolated hand/foot burns or frostbite were included in the study. Descriptive statistics included Student’s T-test and Fisher’s Exact test. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients, 54 frostbite injuries and 9 isolated hand or foot burns, met inclusion criteria for the study. The rate of revision surgery was similar following frostbite and burn injury (24% vs 33%, P=0.681). There were no significant differences in age, gender, or LOS on the primary hospitalization. Neither the impacted limb nor the presence of infection or cellulitis on primary amputation were associated with future need for revision surgery. Of the 16 patients requiring revision surgery, 5 (31%) required additional debridement alone, 6 (38%) required re-amputation alone, and 5 required both. A total of 6 patients (38%) had cellulitis or infection at the time of revision surgery. Time from primary surgery to revision ranged from 4 days to 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Planned, delayed primary amputation is a mainstay of frostbite management. To our knowledge, this is the first assessment of revision surgery in the setting of severe frostbite injury. Our observed rate of revision surgery following frostbite injury did not differ significantly from revision surgery in the setting of isolated hand or foot burns. This study brings up important questions of timing and surgical planning in these complex patients that will require a multicenter collaborative study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8945515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89455152022-03-28 605 Revision Surgery Following Severe Frostbite Compared to Similar Hand and Foot Burns Coward, Alexandra Nygaard, Rachel M Endorf, Frederick W J Burn Care Res Surgical Care, Acute Non-reconstructive 1 INTRODUCTION: Severe frostbite is associated with high levels of morbidity through loss of digits or limbs. The current practice is to salvage as much of the limb/digit as possible with the use of thrombolytic and adjuvant therapies. Sequalae from amputation can include severe nerve pain and poor wound healing requiring revision surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of revision surgery after primary amputation and compare this to revision surgery in isolated hand/foot burns. METHODS: Frostbite and burn patients from 2006 to 2019 were identified in the prospectively maintained database at a single urban burn and trauma center. Patients with primary amputations related to isolated hand/foot burns or frostbite were included in the study. Descriptive statistics included Student’s T-test and Fisher’s Exact test. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients, 54 frostbite injuries and 9 isolated hand or foot burns, met inclusion criteria for the study. The rate of revision surgery was similar following frostbite and burn injury (24% vs 33%, P=0.681). There were no significant differences in age, gender, or LOS on the primary hospitalization. Neither the impacted limb nor the presence of infection or cellulitis on primary amputation were associated with future need for revision surgery. Of the 16 patients requiring revision surgery, 5 (31%) required additional debridement alone, 6 (38%) required re-amputation alone, and 5 required both. A total of 6 patients (38%) had cellulitis or infection at the time of revision surgery. Time from primary surgery to revision ranged from 4 days to 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Planned, delayed primary amputation is a mainstay of frostbite management. To our knowledge, this is the first assessment of revision surgery in the setting of severe frostbite injury. Our observed rate of revision surgery following frostbite injury did not differ significantly from revision surgery in the setting of isolated hand or foot burns. This study brings up important questions of timing and surgical planning in these complex patients that will require a multicenter collaborative study. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8945515/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.233 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Surgical Care, Acute Non-reconstructive 1 Coward, Alexandra Nygaard, Rachel M Endorf, Frederick W 605 Revision Surgery Following Severe Frostbite Compared to Similar Hand and Foot Burns |
title | 605 Revision Surgery Following Severe Frostbite Compared to Similar Hand and Foot Burns |
title_full | 605 Revision Surgery Following Severe Frostbite Compared to Similar Hand and Foot Burns |
title_fullStr | 605 Revision Surgery Following Severe Frostbite Compared to Similar Hand and Foot Burns |
title_full_unstemmed | 605 Revision Surgery Following Severe Frostbite Compared to Similar Hand and Foot Burns |
title_short | 605 Revision Surgery Following Severe Frostbite Compared to Similar Hand and Foot Burns |
title_sort | 605 revision surgery following severe frostbite compared to similar hand and foot burns |
topic | Surgical Care, Acute Non-reconstructive 1 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945515/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cowardalexandra 605revisionsurgeryfollowingseverefrostbitecomparedtosimilarhandandfootburns AT nygaardrachelm 605revisionsurgeryfollowingseverefrostbitecomparedtosimilarhandandfootburns AT endorffrederickw 605revisionsurgeryfollowingseverefrostbitecomparedtosimilarhandandfootburns |