Cargando…

64 Community Level Disadvantage Negatively Impacts Return to Work After Burn Injury

INTRODUCTION: The loss of income from injury, additional health care expenses, and inability to return work can lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. Community level disadvantage (e.g., low high school completion, low home ownership, low income) are more common among minority groups. We hypothesized comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Schachia, McMullen, Kara, Carrougher, Gretchen J, Mason, Stephanie A, Carter, Damien W, Stewart, Barclay T, Thompson, Callie M, Suman-Vejas, Oscar E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945650/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.067
_version_ 1784674004404011008
author Murphy, Schachia
McMullen, Kara
Carrougher, Gretchen J
Mason, Stephanie A
Carter, Damien W
Stewart, Barclay T
Thompson, Callie M
Suman-Vejas, Oscar E
author_facet Murphy, Schachia
McMullen, Kara
Carrougher, Gretchen J
Mason, Stephanie A
Carter, Damien W
Stewart, Barclay T
Thompson, Callie M
Suman-Vejas, Oscar E
author_sort Murphy, Schachia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The loss of income from injury, additional health care expenses, and inability to return work can lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. Community level disadvantage (e.g., low high school completion, low home ownership, low income) are more common among minority groups. We hypothesized community level disadvantage would negatively impact the ability to return to work after burn injury. This could serve to identify patients who need focused social, vocational, and financial support during rehabilitation. METHODS: Data from adult participants in a large multicenter database from 1998-2021 were linked by zip-code to three multi-domain community level-indices: i) Distressed Communities Index, ii) Social Vulnerabilities Index (SVI), iii) Social Deprivation Index (SDI). Cohort characteristics, the distribution of each index within cohort, and days to return to work were described. Fit and strength of association between the indices and return to work was assessed with multi-level logistic regression models. A non-responder analysis examining demographic and clinical differences between was performed using Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to understand potential bias in the findings. RESULTS: A total of 1960 participants provided both zip code and employment data 6 months after injury. 75% of participants were male. Mean age was 39. Race/Ethnicity Data: 81.4% identified as White, 11% Black, and 7% as “other” race; 84% of the participants as non-Hispanic or Latino. Median burn size was 20% TBSA (IQR 0.1-95.0), and length of hospitalization was 30 days (IQR 0-379). Of the community indices tested, both DCI and SVI were associated with return to work with DCI having the strongest association with return to work after injury, irrespective of indices. However, when DCI and SVI were included in the model to represent community disadvantage, the impact of race on return to work was less. Participants who did not provide employment information were younger, sustained larger burn sizes, and had longer LOS compared to those who did. CONCLUSIONS: DCI and SVI are associated with return to work after burn injury and can be used to focus limited social, vocational, and financial services. Minoritized participants were less likely to return to work but they live in communities with greater disadvantage (e.g. fewer employment opportunities), which highlights the public health impacts of structural racism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8945650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89456502022-03-28 64 Community Level Disadvantage Negatively Impacts Return to Work After Burn Injury Murphy, Schachia McMullen, Kara Carrougher, Gretchen J Mason, Stephanie A Carter, Damien W Stewart, Barclay T Thompson, Callie M Suman-Vejas, Oscar E J Burn Care Res Correlative VIII: Prevention/Epidemiology/Public Health 2 INTRODUCTION: The loss of income from injury, additional health care expenses, and inability to return work can lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. Community level disadvantage (e.g., low high school completion, low home ownership, low income) are more common among minority groups. We hypothesized community level disadvantage would negatively impact the ability to return to work after burn injury. This could serve to identify patients who need focused social, vocational, and financial support during rehabilitation. METHODS: Data from adult participants in a large multicenter database from 1998-2021 were linked by zip-code to three multi-domain community level-indices: i) Distressed Communities Index, ii) Social Vulnerabilities Index (SVI), iii) Social Deprivation Index (SDI). Cohort characteristics, the distribution of each index within cohort, and days to return to work were described. Fit and strength of association between the indices and return to work was assessed with multi-level logistic regression models. A non-responder analysis examining demographic and clinical differences between was performed using Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to understand potential bias in the findings. RESULTS: A total of 1960 participants provided both zip code and employment data 6 months after injury. 75% of participants were male. Mean age was 39. Race/Ethnicity Data: 81.4% identified as White, 11% Black, and 7% as “other” race; 84% of the participants as non-Hispanic or Latino. Median burn size was 20% TBSA (IQR 0.1-95.0), and length of hospitalization was 30 days (IQR 0-379). Of the community indices tested, both DCI and SVI were associated with return to work with DCI having the strongest association with return to work after injury, irrespective of indices. However, when DCI and SVI were included in the model to represent community disadvantage, the impact of race on return to work was less. Participants who did not provide employment information were younger, sustained larger burn sizes, and had longer LOS compared to those who did. CONCLUSIONS: DCI and SVI are associated with return to work after burn injury and can be used to focus limited social, vocational, and financial services. Minoritized participants were less likely to return to work but they live in communities with greater disadvantage (e.g. fewer employment opportunities), which highlights the public health impacts of structural racism. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8945650/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.067 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correlative VIII: Prevention/Epidemiology/Public Health 2
Murphy, Schachia
McMullen, Kara
Carrougher, Gretchen J
Mason, Stephanie A
Carter, Damien W
Stewart, Barclay T
Thompson, Callie M
Suman-Vejas, Oscar E
64 Community Level Disadvantage Negatively Impacts Return to Work After Burn Injury
title 64 Community Level Disadvantage Negatively Impacts Return to Work After Burn Injury
title_full 64 Community Level Disadvantage Negatively Impacts Return to Work After Burn Injury
title_fullStr 64 Community Level Disadvantage Negatively Impacts Return to Work After Burn Injury
title_full_unstemmed 64 Community Level Disadvantage Negatively Impacts Return to Work After Burn Injury
title_short 64 Community Level Disadvantage Negatively Impacts Return to Work After Burn Injury
title_sort 64 community level disadvantage negatively impacts return to work after burn injury
topic Correlative VIII: Prevention/Epidemiology/Public Health 2
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945650/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.067
work_keys_str_mv AT murphyschachia 64communityleveldisadvantagenegativelyimpactsreturntoworkafterburninjury
AT mcmullenkara 64communityleveldisadvantagenegativelyimpactsreturntoworkafterburninjury
AT carroughergretchenj 64communityleveldisadvantagenegativelyimpactsreturntoworkafterburninjury
AT masonstephaniea 64communityleveldisadvantagenegativelyimpactsreturntoworkafterburninjury
AT carterdamienw 64communityleveldisadvantagenegativelyimpactsreturntoworkafterburninjury
AT stewartbarclayt 64communityleveldisadvantagenegativelyimpactsreturntoworkafterburninjury
AT thompsoncalliem 64communityleveldisadvantagenegativelyimpactsreturntoworkafterburninjury
AT sumanvejasoscare 64communityleveldisadvantagenegativelyimpactsreturntoworkafterburninjury