Cargando…

706 High Versus Low Dose Vitamin C in Burn Care

INTRODUCTION: While vitamin C is a regular part of burn management, there is no consensus on the most effective dose for a reduction in mortality, fluid resuscitation requirement, and other various clinical benefits. In this study, we aim to evaluate the potential protective effects of a higher dose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jong, Seungwon, Malkoc, Aldin, Fine, Kerry, Dao, Tam, Wong, David T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945666/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.260
_version_ 1784674008211390464
author Jong, Seungwon
Malkoc, Aldin
Fine, Kerry
Dao, Tam
Wong, David T
author_facet Jong, Seungwon
Malkoc, Aldin
Fine, Kerry
Dao, Tam
Wong, David T
author_sort Jong, Seungwon
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While vitamin C is a regular part of burn management, there is no consensus on the most effective dose for a reduction in mortality, fluid resuscitation requirement, and other various clinical benefits. In this study, we aim to evaluate the potential protective effects of a higher dose of intravenous vitamin C in burn patients with greater than 40% total body surface area (TBSA) as compared to the effects on low dose oral vitamin C with lower TBSA burns. METHODS: A total of 54 subjects were retrospectively reviewed with burns greater than 20% TBSA from January 2018 to 2021. In our burn unit, patients with smaller burns were given 2,500 mg PO vitamin C and larger TBSA burns were given 15,000 mg IV vitamin C within 72 hours. During this period, we found 40 patients in the low dose group and 14 patients in the higher dose group. Demographics, length of stay, length on a ventilator, fluid requirements, number of procedures, days to the first infection, and mortality were compared using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: We found that there was a significant difference in the degree of burn on admission and reassessment between the dosing groups (30% vs. 48%, p = 0.006; 32% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Overall fluid requirements for the first three days (9 liters vs. 25 liters, p < 0.001), length of stay (13 days vs. 38 days, p = 0.011), length on a ventilator (2 days vs. 13 days, p < 0.001), and total procedures required (1 vs. 5, p = 0.014) were also significantly higher in the group given the IV dose. No significant difference in other outcomes such as days until first infection and mortality rate were found, (p=0.451 and 0.326, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Parameters that were statistically significant were consistent with the higher burn TBSA. Despite the group with larger surface area burns to require much higher fluid requirements (25 liters vs. 9 liters in 72 hours), high dose IV vitamin C may have been protective since the outcomes of days until first infection and mortality rate had no significant difference compared to the group with the smaller TBSA burn which should have predictably better outcomes. This clinical study supports other studies that high dose vitamin C may improve outcomes from a reduction in capillary leak to mortality but an adequately powered randomized prospective approach is needed to better define the benefits as well as dosing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8945666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89456662022-03-28 706 High Versus Low Dose Vitamin C in Burn Care Jong, Seungwon Malkoc, Aldin Fine, Kerry Dao, Tam Wong, David T J Burn Care Res Clinical Sciences: Critical Care 3 INTRODUCTION: While vitamin C is a regular part of burn management, there is no consensus on the most effective dose for a reduction in mortality, fluid resuscitation requirement, and other various clinical benefits. In this study, we aim to evaluate the potential protective effects of a higher dose of intravenous vitamin C in burn patients with greater than 40% total body surface area (TBSA) as compared to the effects on low dose oral vitamin C with lower TBSA burns. METHODS: A total of 54 subjects were retrospectively reviewed with burns greater than 20% TBSA from January 2018 to 2021. In our burn unit, patients with smaller burns were given 2,500 mg PO vitamin C and larger TBSA burns were given 15,000 mg IV vitamin C within 72 hours. During this period, we found 40 patients in the low dose group and 14 patients in the higher dose group. Demographics, length of stay, length on a ventilator, fluid requirements, number of procedures, days to the first infection, and mortality were compared using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: We found that there was a significant difference in the degree of burn on admission and reassessment between the dosing groups (30% vs. 48%, p = 0.006; 32% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Overall fluid requirements for the first three days (9 liters vs. 25 liters, p < 0.001), length of stay (13 days vs. 38 days, p = 0.011), length on a ventilator (2 days vs. 13 days, p < 0.001), and total procedures required (1 vs. 5, p = 0.014) were also significantly higher in the group given the IV dose. No significant difference in other outcomes such as days until first infection and mortality rate were found, (p=0.451 and 0.326, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Parameters that were statistically significant were consistent with the higher burn TBSA. Despite the group with larger surface area burns to require much higher fluid requirements (25 liters vs. 9 liters in 72 hours), high dose IV vitamin C may have been protective since the outcomes of days until first infection and mortality rate had no significant difference compared to the group with the smaller TBSA burn which should have predictably better outcomes. This clinical study supports other studies that high dose vitamin C may improve outcomes from a reduction in capillary leak to mortality but an adequately powered randomized prospective approach is needed to better define the benefits as well as dosing. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8945666/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.260 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Sciences: Critical Care 3
Jong, Seungwon
Malkoc, Aldin
Fine, Kerry
Dao, Tam
Wong, David T
706 High Versus Low Dose Vitamin C in Burn Care
title 706 High Versus Low Dose Vitamin C in Burn Care
title_full 706 High Versus Low Dose Vitamin C in Burn Care
title_fullStr 706 High Versus Low Dose Vitamin C in Burn Care
title_full_unstemmed 706 High Versus Low Dose Vitamin C in Burn Care
title_short 706 High Versus Low Dose Vitamin C in Burn Care
title_sort 706 high versus low dose vitamin c in burn care
topic Clinical Sciences: Critical Care 3
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945666/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.260
work_keys_str_mv AT jongseungwon 706highversuslowdosevitamincinburncare
AT malkocaldin 706highversuslowdosevitamincinburncare
AT finekerry 706highversuslowdosevitamincinburncare
AT daotam 706highversuslowdosevitamincinburncare
AT wongdavidt 706highversuslowdosevitamincinburncare