Cargando…

38 Utilizing an Implementation Science Framework to Design a Burn Resuscitation Bundle in a Resource-limited Setting

INTRODUCTION: Protocolized burn resuscitation algorithms with hourly, closed loop feedback, have reduced instances of over- and under-resuscitation and improved outcomes in high income countries. However, a “know-do” gap exists as this practice has yet to be adopted in many low- and middle-income co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehta, Kajal, Lee, Joohee, Mesic, Aldina, Yadav, Manish K, Shrestha, Raslina, Poudel, Kiran, Gyawali, Prakriti, Pham, Tam N, Rai, Shankar, Stewart, Barclay T, Nakarmi, Kiran K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945673/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.041
_version_ 1784674009857654784
author Mehta, Kajal
Lee, Joohee
Mesic, Aldina
Yadav, Manish K
Shrestha, Raslina
Poudel, Kiran
Gyawali, Prakriti
Pham, Tam N
Rai, Shankar
Stewart, Barclay T
Nakarmi, Kiran K
author_facet Mehta, Kajal
Lee, Joohee
Mesic, Aldina
Yadav, Manish K
Shrestha, Raslina
Poudel, Kiran
Gyawali, Prakriti
Pham, Tam N
Rai, Shankar
Stewart, Barclay T
Nakarmi, Kiran K
author_sort Mehta, Kajal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Protocolized burn resuscitation algorithms with hourly, closed loop feedback, have reduced instances of over- and under-resuscitation and improved outcomes in high income countries. However, a “know-do” gap exists as this practice has yet to be adopted in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). We aimed to describe the change management process of the development and implementation of a contextually driven protocolized burn resuscitation bundle at a tertiary burn center in an LMIC using an implementation science framework. METHODS: We applied strategies from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) for the design and implementation of a burn resuscitation bundle at a major burn center in an LMIC, over a 9-month period. Semi-structured focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted with stakeholders to understand facilitators and barriers to developing and using the protocol, with iterative feedback used to inform and adjust the protocol and documentation tools. Responses were analyzed using content analysis and particularly unique and useful responses were highlighted. RESULTS: Stakeholders identified resource constraint-related concerns about the feasibility of an hourly IV resuscitation protocol and reached consensus on performing 2-hourly assessments and fluid adjustments. Corresponding documentation tools were developed and iteratively adjusted. Several initial barriers to adoption and institutionalization were encountered. ERIC strategies used to promote intervention uptake included simplification and visualization of the protocol, identification of a project champion, development of educational materials for multiple cadres (e.g., nurses, physicians, health assistants), use of chain of command to enable change and accountability, utilizing institutional branding and ultimately obtaining endorsement by the center’s leadership (Table 1). Post-implementation FGD with stakeholders revealed high levels of acceptance, utilization and adherence of the protocol bundle, with occasional opportunities for improvement identified in protocol completeness and accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of change in clinical resuscitation practice in a resource-constrained setting required a contextually driven, multi-faceted approach led by a team of change champions and leaders. The ERIC framework allowed for an iterative approach to prioritize stakeholder engagement and feedback, in order to implement a protocolized IV resuscitation bundle in a LMIC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8945673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89456732022-03-28 38 Utilizing an Implementation Science Framework to Design a Burn Resuscitation Bundle in a Resource-limited Setting Mehta, Kajal Lee, Joohee Mesic, Aldina Yadav, Manish K Shrestha, Raslina Poudel, Kiran Gyawali, Prakriti Pham, Tam N Rai, Shankar Stewart, Barclay T Nakarmi, Kiran K J Burn Care Res Correlative V: Quality Improvement INTRODUCTION: Protocolized burn resuscitation algorithms with hourly, closed loop feedback, have reduced instances of over- and under-resuscitation and improved outcomes in high income countries. However, a “know-do” gap exists as this practice has yet to be adopted in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). We aimed to describe the change management process of the development and implementation of a contextually driven protocolized burn resuscitation bundle at a tertiary burn center in an LMIC using an implementation science framework. METHODS: We applied strategies from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) for the design and implementation of a burn resuscitation bundle at a major burn center in an LMIC, over a 9-month period. Semi-structured focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted with stakeholders to understand facilitators and barriers to developing and using the protocol, with iterative feedback used to inform and adjust the protocol and documentation tools. Responses were analyzed using content analysis and particularly unique and useful responses were highlighted. RESULTS: Stakeholders identified resource constraint-related concerns about the feasibility of an hourly IV resuscitation protocol and reached consensus on performing 2-hourly assessments and fluid adjustments. Corresponding documentation tools were developed and iteratively adjusted. Several initial barriers to adoption and institutionalization were encountered. ERIC strategies used to promote intervention uptake included simplification and visualization of the protocol, identification of a project champion, development of educational materials for multiple cadres (e.g., nurses, physicians, health assistants), use of chain of command to enable change and accountability, utilizing institutional branding and ultimately obtaining endorsement by the center’s leadership (Table 1). Post-implementation FGD with stakeholders revealed high levels of acceptance, utilization and adherence of the protocol bundle, with occasional opportunities for improvement identified in protocol completeness and accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of change in clinical resuscitation practice in a resource-constrained setting required a contextually driven, multi-faceted approach led by a team of change champions and leaders. The ERIC framework allowed for an iterative approach to prioritize stakeholder engagement and feedback, in order to implement a protocolized IV resuscitation bundle in a LMIC. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8945673/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.041 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correlative V: Quality Improvement
Mehta, Kajal
Lee, Joohee
Mesic, Aldina
Yadav, Manish K
Shrestha, Raslina
Poudel, Kiran
Gyawali, Prakriti
Pham, Tam N
Rai, Shankar
Stewart, Barclay T
Nakarmi, Kiran K
38 Utilizing an Implementation Science Framework to Design a Burn Resuscitation Bundle in a Resource-limited Setting
title 38 Utilizing an Implementation Science Framework to Design a Burn Resuscitation Bundle in a Resource-limited Setting
title_full 38 Utilizing an Implementation Science Framework to Design a Burn Resuscitation Bundle in a Resource-limited Setting
title_fullStr 38 Utilizing an Implementation Science Framework to Design a Burn Resuscitation Bundle in a Resource-limited Setting
title_full_unstemmed 38 Utilizing an Implementation Science Framework to Design a Burn Resuscitation Bundle in a Resource-limited Setting
title_short 38 Utilizing an Implementation Science Framework to Design a Burn Resuscitation Bundle in a Resource-limited Setting
title_sort 38 utilizing an implementation science framework to design a burn resuscitation bundle in a resource-limited setting
topic Correlative V: Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945673/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.041
work_keys_str_mv AT mehtakajal 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT leejoohee 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT mesicaldina 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT yadavmanishk 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT shrestharaslina 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT poudelkiran 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT gyawaliprakriti 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT phamtamn 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT raishankar 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT stewartbarclayt 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT nakarmikirank 38utilizinganimplementationscienceframeworktodesignaburnresuscitationbundleinaresourcelimitedsetting