Cargando…

36 Common Data Elements (CDE) in Burn Care Documentation: A Single-center Retrospective Review

INTRODUCTION: Thorough documentation is an important component of delivering quality patient care. Documentation of common data elements (CDE), defined as a precise question with a specified set of responses used across multiple databases or studies, can also assist in improving data collection. Cur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dang, Justin, Bernabe, Rendell, Lin, Joshua, Kuromaru, Yuki, Pham, Christopher H, Huang, Samantha, Sheth, Megha, Yenikomshian, Haig A, Gillenwater, Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945949/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.039
_version_ 1784674076309061632
author Dang, Justin
Bernabe, Rendell
Lin, Joshua
Kuromaru, Yuki
Pham, Christopher H
Huang, Samantha
Sheth, Megha
Yenikomshian, Haig A
Gillenwater, Justin
author_facet Dang, Justin
Bernabe, Rendell
Lin, Joshua
Kuromaru, Yuki
Pham, Christopher H
Huang, Samantha
Sheth, Megha
Yenikomshian, Haig A
Gillenwater, Justin
author_sort Dang, Justin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Thorough documentation is an important component of delivering quality patient care. Documentation of common data elements (CDE), defined as a precise question with a specified set of responses used across multiple databases or studies, can also assist in improving data collection. Currently, burn care does not have an existing set of CDEs despite their potential to be a reproducible and reliable system for data collection which leads to improved burn care. Our institution performed a retrospective review of patient charts to identify the consistency of our burn care documentation and highlight deficits that could be remedied by the implementation of CDEs. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of patient charts from 2014-2019. Thirty-three CDEs were investigated. Two hundred four patient charts were randomly selected for review. We presented extracted CDEs as frequencies and percentages. Information was obtained from the history and physical notes, progress notes, and discharge summaries. RESULTS: Our review yielded 204 patient records. The note/record of some data points could not be identified and were excluded from the qualitative calculation. Of the data points that included more than 200 records, 86% percent specified the date of injury, 88% recorded the admission date, 99% reported burn etiology, 94% included total body surface area (TBSA) burned, 94% included burn thickness, 99% specified anatomic injury location, 97% included information about wound care agents/dressings, and 24% recorded the patient’s pain scores. Thirty percent (49/164) reported the presence or absence of inhalation injury. Twenty-six percent (38/148) listed reported presence or absence of non-burn related injuries. Sixty-four percent (127/200) reported presence or absence of comorbid conditions. Other data points were found with varying frequencies (Table 1). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent documentation of burn care remains challenging and many variables are collected inconsistently. Our results highlight the need for CDEs in burn care to standardize documentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8945949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89459492022-03-28 36 Common Data Elements (CDE) in Burn Care Documentation: A Single-center Retrospective Review Dang, Justin Bernabe, Rendell Lin, Joshua Kuromaru, Yuki Pham, Christopher H Huang, Samantha Sheth, Megha Yenikomshian, Haig A Gillenwater, Justin J Burn Care Res Correlative V: Quality Improvement INTRODUCTION: Thorough documentation is an important component of delivering quality patient care. Documentation of common data elements (CDE), defined as a precise question with a specified set of responses used across multiple databases or studies, can also assist in improving data collection. Currently, burn care does not have an existing set of CDEs despite their potential to be a reproducible and reliable system for data collection which leads to improved burn care. Our institution performed a retrospective review of patient charts to identify the consistency of our burn care documentation and highlight deficits that could be remedied by the implementation of CDEs. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of patient charts from 2014-2019. Thirty-three CDEs were investigated. Two hundred four patient charts were randomly selected for review. We presented extracted CDEs as frequencies and percentages. Information was obtained from the history and physical notes, progress notes, and discharge summaries. RESULTS: Our review yielded 204 patient records. The note/record of some data points could not be identified and were excluded from the qualitative calculation. Of the data points that included more than 200 records, 86% percent specified the date of injury, 88% recorded the admission date, 99% reported burn etiology, 94% included total body surface area (TBSA) burned, 94% included burn thickness, 99% specified anatomic injury location, 97% included information about wound care agents/dressings, and 24% recorded the patient’s pain scores. Thirty percent (49/164) reported the presence or absence of inhalation injury. Twenty-six percent (38/148) listed reported presence or absence of non-burn related injuries. Sixty-four percent (127/200) reported presence or absence of comorbid conditions. Other data points were found with varying frequencies (Table 1). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent documentation of burn care remains challenging and many variables are collected inconsistently. Our results highlight the need for CDEs in burn care to standardize documentation. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8945949/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.039 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correlative V: Quality Improvement
Dang, Justin
Bernabe, Rendell
Lin, Joshua
Kuromaru, Yuki
Pham, Christopher H
Huang, Samantha
Sheth, Megha
Yenikomshian, Haig A
Gillenwater, Justin
36 Common Data Elements (CDE) in Burn Care Documentation: A Single-center Retrospective Review
title 36 Common Data Elements (CDE) in Burn Care Documentation: A Single-center Retrospective Review
title_full 36 Common Data Elements (CDE) in Burn Care Documentation: A Single-center Retrospective Review
title_fullStr 36 Common Data Elements (CDE) in Burn Care Documentation: A Single-center Retrospective Review
title_full_unstemmed 36 Common Data Elements (CDE) in Burn Care Documentation: A Single-center Retrospective Review
title_short 36 Common Data Elements (CDE) in Burn Care Documentation: A Single-center Retrospective Review
title_sort 36 common data elements (cde) in burn care documentation: a single-center retrospective review
topic Correlative V: Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945949/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.039
work_keys_str_mv AT dangjustin 36commondataelementscdeinburncaredocumentationasinglecenterretrospectivereview
AT bernaberendell 36commondataelementscdeinburncaredocumentationasinglecenterretrospectivereview
AT linjoshua 36commondataelementscdeinburncaredocumentationasinglecenterretrospectivereview
AT kuromaruyuki 36commondataelementscdeinburncaredocumentationasinglecenterretrospectivereview
AT phamchristopherh 36commondataelementscdeinburncaredocumentationasinglecenterretrospectivereview
AT huangsamantha 36commondataelementscdeinburncaredocumentationasinglecenterretrospectivereview
AT shethmegha 36commondataelementscdeinburncaredocumentationasinglecenterretrospectivereview
AT yenikomshianhaiga 36commondataelementscdeinburncaredocumentationasinglecenterretrospectivereview
AT gillenwaterjustin 36commondataelementscdeinburncaredocumentationasinglecenterretrospectivereview