Cargando…

117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing

INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used in burn patients. Traditionally, vancomycin has been managed with a trough level dosing strategy. However, recent literature and practice changes have encouraged utilizing an area under the curve (AUC) dosing strategy. The objecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyd, Allison N, Walroth, Todd A, Bollinger, Christopher, Candidate, M B A, Hartman, Brett C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945988/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.119
_version_ 1784674086219153408
author Boyd, Allison N
Walroth, Todd A
Bollinger, Christopher
Candidate, M B A
Hartman, Brett C
author_facet Boyd, Allison N
Walroth, Todd A
Bollinger, Christopher
Candidate, M B A
Hartman, Brett C
author_sort Boyd, Allison N
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used in burn patients. Traditionally, vancomycin has been managed with a trough level dosing strategy. However, recent literature and practice changes have encouraged utilizing an area under the curve (AUC) dosing strategy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of attaining therapeutic targets using population kinetics in burn patients utilizing AUC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included adult burn patients who received vancomycin dosed with an AUC strategy. Data collection covered 20 months following an institutional shift to AUC monitoring. Patients were excluded if they did not have pharmacokinetic (PK) data documented, received renal replacement therapy, or had a nonburn injury. The primary outcome was the difference between predicted and actual vancomycin AUC. Secondary outcomes included differences between additional PK parameters. RESULTS: The AUC analysis included 14 patients. Mean (SD) age was 47 (12) years, 57% were male, and mean (SD) TBSA was 30 (21). The mean (SD) AUC in the predicted and actual groups was 522 (42) and 455 (122) mg*h/L, respectively (p=0.05). A total of 6 patients were evaluated for additional PK analysis, summarized in Table 1. CONCLUSIONS: Actual patient-specific AUC was significantly lower than predicted AUC. This corroborates previous trough-based data indicating burn patients dosed using standard population estimates are at risk of being subtherapeutic, likely due to their hypermetabolic state. Our findings suggest AUC monitoring is an appropriate dosing strategy for burn patients and potentially more accurate than a traditional trough-based approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8945988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89459882022-03-28 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing Boyd, Allison N Walroth, Todd A Bollinger, Christopher Candidate, M B A Hartman, Brett C J Burn Care Res Correlative XV: Medical Care Non-Critical INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used in burn patients. Traditionally, vancomycin has been managed with a trough level dosing strategy. However, recent literature and practice changes have encouraged utilizing an area under the curve (AUC) dosing strategy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of attaining therapeutic targets using population kinetics in burn patients utilizing AUC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included adult burn patients who received vancomycin dosed with an AUC strategy. Data collection covered 20 months following an institutional shift to AUC monitoring. Patients were excluded if they did not have pharmacokinetic (PK) data documented, received renal replacement therapy, or had a nonburn injury. The primary outcome was the difference between predicted and actual vancomycin AUC. Secondary outcomes included differences between additional PK parameters. RESULTS: The AUC analysis included 14 patients. Mean (SD) age was 47 (12) years, 57% were male, and mean (SD) TBSA was 30 (21). The mean (SD) AUC in the predicted and actual groups was 522 (42) and 455 (122) mg*h/L, respectively (p=0.05). A total of 6 patients were evaluated for additional PK analysis, summarized in Table 1. CONCLUSIONS: Actual patient-specific AUC was significantly lower than predicted AUC. This corroborates previous trough-based data indicating burn patients dosed using standard population estimates are at risk of being subtherapeutic, likely due to their hypermetabolic state. Our findings suggest AUC monitoring is an appropriate dosing strategy for burn patients and potentially more accurate than a traditional trough-based approach. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8945988/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.119 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correlative XV: Medical Care Non-Critical
Boyd, Allison N
Walroth, Todd A
Bollinger, Christopher
Candidate, M B A
Hartman, Brett C
117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing
title 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing
title_full 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing
title_fullStr 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing
title_full_unstemmed 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing
title_short 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing
title_sort 117 evaluating predicted vs. actual vancomycin pharmacokinetic target attainment using auc dosing
topic Correlative XV: Medical Care Non-Critical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945988/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.119
work_keys_str_mv AT boydallisonn 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing
AT walrothtodda 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing
AT bollingerchristopher 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing
AT candidatemba 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing
AT hartmanbrettc 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing