Cargando…
117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing
INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used in burn patients. Traditionally, vancomycin has been managed with a trough level dosing strategy. However, recent literature and practice changes have encouraged utilizing an area under the curve (AUC) dosing strategy. The objecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945988/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.119 |
_version_ | 1784674086219153408 |
---|---|
author | Boyd, Allison N Walroth, Todd A Bollinger, Christopher Candidate, M B A Hartman, Brett C |
author_facet | Boyd, Allison N Walroth, Todd A Bollinger, Christopher Candidate, M B A Hartman, Brett C |
author_sort | Boyd, Allison N |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used in burn patients. Traditionally, vancomycin has been managed with a trough level dosing strategy. However, recent literature and practice changes have encouraged utilizing an area under the curve (AUC) dosing strategy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of attaining therapeutic targets using population kinetics in burn patients utilizing AUC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included adult burn patients who received vancomycin dosed with an AUC strategy. Data collection covered 20 months following an institutional shift to AUC monitoring. Patients were excluded if they did not have pharmacokinetic (PK) data documented, received renal replacement therapy, or had a nonburn injury. The primary outcome was the difference between predicted and actual vancomycin AUC. Secondary outcomes included differences between additional PK parameters. RESULTS: The AUC analysis included 14 patients. Mean (SD) age was 47 (12) years, 57% were male, and mean (SD) TBSA was 30 (21). The mean (SD) AUC in the predicted and actual groups was 522 (42) and 455 (122) mg*h/L, respectively (p=0.05). A total of 6 patients were evaluated for additional PK analysis, summarized in Table 1. CONCLUSIONS: Actual patient-specific AUC was significantly lower than predicted AUC. This corroborates previous trough-based data indicating burn patients dosed using standard population estimates are at risk of being subtherapeutic, likely due to their hypermetabolic state. Our findings suggest AUC monitoring is an appropriate dosing strategy for burn patients and potentially more accurate than a traditional trough-based approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8945988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89459882022-03-28 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing Boyd, Allison N Walroth, Todd A Bollinger, Christopher Candidate, M B A Hartman, Brett C J Burn Care Res Correlative XV: Medical Care Non-Critical INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used in burn patients. Traditionally, vancomycin has been managed with a trough level dosing strategy. However, recent literature and practice changes have encouraged utilizing an area under the curve (AUC) dosing strategy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of attaining therapeutic targets using population kinetics in burn patients utilizing AUC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included adult burn patients who received vancomycin dosed with an AUC strategy. Data collection covered 20 months following an institutional shift to AUC monitoring. Patients were excluded if they did not have pharmacokinetic (PK) data documented, received renal replacement therapy, or had a nonburn injury. The primary outcome was the difference between predicted and actual vancomycin AUC. Secondary outcomes included differences between additional PK parameters. RESULTS: The AUC analysis included 14 patients. Mean (SD) age was 47 (12) years, 57% were male, and mean (SD) TBSA was 30 (21). The mean (SD) AUC in the predicted and actual groups was 522 (42) and 455 (122) mg*h/L, respectively (p=0.05). A total of 6 patients were evaluated for additional PK analysis, summarized in Table 1. CONCLUSIONS: Actual patient-specific AUC was significantly lower than predicted AUC. This corroborates previous trough-based data indicating burn patients dosed using standard population estimates are at risk of being subtherapeutic, likely due to their hypermetabolic state. Our findings suggest AUC monitoring is an appropriate dosing strategy for burn patients and potentially more accurate than a traditional trough-based approach. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8945988/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.119 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Correlative XV: Medical Care Non-Critical Boyd, Allison N Walroth, Todd A Bollinger, Christopher Candidate, M B A Hartman, Brett C 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing |
title | 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing |
title_full | 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing |
title_fullStr | 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing |
title_full_unstemmed | 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing |
title_short | 117 Evaluating Predicted vs. Actual Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment Using AUC Dosing |
title_sort | 117 evaluating predicted vs. actual vancomycin pharmacokinetic target attainment using auc dosing |
topic | Correlative XV: Medical Care Non-Critical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8945988/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boydallisonn 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing AT walrothtodda 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing AT bollingerchristopher 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing AT candidatemba 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing AT hartmanbrettc 117evaluatingpredictedvsactualvancomycinpharmacokinetictargetattainmentusingaucdosing |