Cargando…

78 Classification and Regression Tree Model for Predicting Satisfaction with Life Scale Scores After Burn Injury

INTRODUCTION: Current early burn care prognostication models predict in-hospital mortality (e.g., revised Baux Score). However, patients, families and clinicians need more holistic tools in the hours and days after injury to identify specific factors that might affect their quality of life and indic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bissoon, Zephorah, Gause, Emma L, Carrougher, Gretchen J, Baker, Claudia, Wiechman, Shelley A, Pham, Tam N, Gibran, Nicole S, Stewart, Barclay T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946063/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.081
_version_ 1784674104711839744
author Bissoon, Zephorah
Gause, Emma L
Carrougher, Gretchen J
Baker, Claudia
Wiechman, Shelley A
Pham, Tam N
Gibran, Nicole S
Stewart, Barclay T
author_facet Bissoon, Zephorah
Gause, Emma L
Carrougher, Gretchen J
Baker, Claudia
Wiechman, Shelley A
Pham, Tam N
Gibran, Nicole S
Stewart, Barclay T
author_sort Bissoon, Zephorah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Current early burn care prognostication models predict in-hospital mortality (e.g., revised Baux Score). However, patients, families and clinicians need more holistic tools in the hours and days after injury to identify specific factors that might affect their quality of life and indicate a need for more intensive services. This project aims to predict Satisfaction with Life (SWL) in survivors of burn injury using patient, injury, and care factors available within 24 hours of admission. METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen participants were identified from a multicenter national longitudinal database and merged with clinical data from a single institution's trauma registry. Patients were randomized into a training dataset (80%) and a testing dataset (20%). A CART algorithm was used to examine the relative contributions of individual predictor variables in classifying low SWL at six-month follow up (SWL ≤ 20). Seventeen covariables obtained within 24 hours of index hospital admission were analyzed from five domains: demographics, comorbidities, injury, care, and host response to injury. Lab values were those closest to but not greater than 24 hours after index hospital admission. RESULTS: Multiple covariables contributed to the SWL score. CART analysis selected a pre-injury SWL score < 31 as the first node and strongest indicator of low SWL. CART then selected the following subgroups at risk for SWL ≤ 20 at 6 months: (1) hematocrit >55%; (2) lactate >4 mmol/L, age > 59; (3) total body surface area (TBSA) burned >30%, presence of a hand, neck, and/or face burn. The cross-validated predictive accuracy of the CART model was 69.4% with a cross-validated relative error of 0.379. In the validation data set, sensitivity and specificity were 62.5% and 72.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate the potential feasibility of creating a model that can predict a clinically meaningful quality of life outcome using covariables gathered within hours of hospital admission after burn injury. Predictive measures suggest that while some of the included covariables may be associated with SWL, they are not consistently and reliably predictive of low SWL alone. With more data and additional refined inputs, a similar model could be used to identify those in need of more intensive services earlier on in the hospitalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8946063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89460632022-03-28 78 Classification and Regression Tree Model for Predicting Satisfaction with Life Scale Scores After Burn Injury Bissoon, Zephorah Gause, Emma L Carrougher, Gretchen J Baker, Claudia Wiechman, Shelley A Pham, Tam N Gibran, Nicole S Stewart, Barclay T J Burn Care Res Correlative X: Aftercare & Reintegration INTRODUCTION: Current early burn care prognostication models predict in-hospital mortality (e.g., revised Baux Score). However, patients, families and clinicians need more holistic tools in the hours and days after injury to identify specific factors that might affect their quality of life and indicate a need for more intensive services. This project aims to predict Satisfaction with Life (SWL) in survivors of burn injury using patient, injury, and care factors available within 24 hours of admission. METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen participants were identified from a multicenter national longitudinal database and merged with clinical data from a single institution's trauma registry. Patients were randomized into a training dataset (80%) and a testing dataset (20%). A CART algorithm was used to examine the relative contributions of individual predictor variables in classifying low SWL at six-month follow up (SWL ≤ 20). Seventeen covariables obtained within 24 hours of index hospital admission were analyzed from five domains: demographics, comorbidities, injury, care, and host response to injury. Lab values were those closest to but not greater than 24 hours after index hospital admission. RESULTS: Multiple covariables contributed to the SWL score. CART analysis selected a pre-injury SWL score < 31 as the first node and strongest indicator of low SWL. CART then selected the following subgroups at risk for SWL ≤ 20 at 6 months: (1) hematocrit >55%; (2) lactate >4 mmol/L, age > 59; (3) total body surface area (TBSA) burned >30%, presence of a hand, neck, and/or face burn. The cross-validated predictive accuracy of the CART model was 69.4% with a cross-validated relative error of 0.379. In the validation data set, sensitivity and specificity were 62.5% and 72.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate the potential feasibility of creating a model that can predict a clinically meaningful quality of life outcome using covariables gathered within hours of hospital admission after burn injury. Predictive measures suggest that while some of the included covariables may be associated with SWL, they are not consistently and reliably predictive of low SWL alone. With more data and additional refined inputs, a similar model could be used to identify those in need of more intensive services earlier on in the hospitalization. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8946063/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.081 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correlative X: Aftercare & Reintegration
Bissoon, Zephorah
Gause, Emma L
Carrougher, Gretchen J
Baker, Claudia
Wiechman, Shelley A
Pham, Tam N
Gibran, Nicole S
Stewart, Barclay T
78 Classification and Regression Tree Model for Predicting Satisfaction with Life Scale Scores After Burn Injury
title 78 Classification and Regression Tree Model for Predicting Satisfaction with Life Scale Scores After Burn Injury
title_full 78 Classification and Regression Tree Model for Predicting Satisfaction with Life Scale Scores After Burn Injury
title_fullStr 78 Classification and Regression Tree Model for Predicting Satisfaction with Life Scale Scores After Burn Injury
title_full_unstemmed 78 Classification and Regression Tree Model for Predicting Satisfaction with Life Scale Scores After Burn Injury
title_short 78 Classification and Regression Tree Model for Predicting Satisfaction with Life Scale Scores After Burn Injury
title_sort 78 classification and regression tree model for predicting satisfaction with life scale scores after burn injury
topic Correlative X: Aftercare & Reintegration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946063/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.081
work_keys_str_mv AT bissoonzephorah 78classificationandregressiontreemodelforpredictingsatisfactionwithlifescalescoresafterburninjury
AT gauseemmal 78classificationandregressiontreemodelforpredictingsatisfactionwithlifescalescoresafterburninjury
AT carroughergretchenj 78classificationandregressiontreemodelforpredictingsatisfactionwithlifescalescoresafterburninjury
AT bakerclaudia 78classificationandregressiontreemodelforpredictingsatisfactionwithlifescalescoresafterburninjury
AT wiechmanshelleya 78classificationandregressiontreemodelforpredictingsatisfactionwithlifescalescoresafterburninjury
AT phamtamn 78classificationandregressiontreemodelforpredictingsatisfactionwithlifescalescoresafterburninjury
AT gibrannicoles 78classificationandregressiontreemodelforpredictingsatisfactionwithlifescalescoresafterburninjury
AT stewartbarclayt 78classificationandregressiontreemodelforpredictingsatisfactionwithlifescalescoresafterburninjury