Cargando…

Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Conclusions of meta-analyses of clinical studies may substantially influence opinions of prospective patients and stakeholders in healthcare. Nineteen meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of primary knee osteoarthritis (pkOA) with stem cells, published between January...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitz, Christoph, Alt, Christopher, Pearce, David A., Furia, John P., Maffulli, Nicola, Alt, Eckhard U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35326416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11060965
_version_ 1784674112104300544
author Schmitz, Christoph
Alt, Christopher
Pearce, David A.
Furia, John P.
Maffulli, Nicola
Alt, Eckhard U.
author_facet Schmitz, Christoph
Alt, Christopher
Pearce, David A.
Furia, John P.
Maffulli, Nicola
Alt, Eckhard U.
author_sort Schmitz, Christoph
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Conclusions of meta-analyses of clinical studies may substantially influence opinions of prospective patients and stakeholders in healthcare. Nineteen meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of primary knee osteoarthritis (pkOA) with stem cells, published between January 2020 and July 2021, came to inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment modality. It is possible that a separate meta-analysis based on an independent, systematic assessment of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells may reach a different conclusion. (2) Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical studies and meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells. All clinical studies and meta-analyses identified were evaluated in detail, as were all sub-analyses included in the meta-analyses. (3) Results: The inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of treating pkOA with stem cells in the 19 assessed meta-analyses were most probably based on substantial differences in literature search strategies among different authors, misconceptions about meta-analyses themselves, and misconceptions about the comparability of different types of stem cells with regard to their safety and regenerative potential. An independent, systematic review of the literature yielded a total of 183 studies, of which 33 were randomized clinical trials, including a total of 6860 patients with pkOA. However, it was not possible to perform a scientifically sound meta-analysis. (4) Conclusions: Clinicians should interpret the results of the 19 assessed meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells with caution and should be cautious of the conclusions drawn therein. Clinicians and researchers should strive to participate in FDA and/or EMA reviewed and approved clinical trials to provide clinically and statistically valid efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8946093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89460932022-03-25 Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review Schmitz, Christoph Alt, Christopher Pearce, David A. Furia, John P. Maffulli, Nicola Alt, Eckhard U. Cells Systematic Review (1) Background: Conclusions of meta-analyses of clinical studies may substantially influence opinions of prospective patients and stakeholders in healthcare. Nineteen meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of primary knee osteoarthritis (pkOA) with stem cells, published between January 2020 and July 2021, came to inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment modality. It is possible that a separate meta-analysis based on an independent, systematic assessment of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells may reach a different conclusion. (2) Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical studies and meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells. All clinical studies and meta-analyses identified were evaluated in detail, as were all sub-analyses included in the meta-analyses. (3) Results: The inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of treating pkOA with stem cells in the 19 assessed meta-analyses were most probably based on substantial differences in literature search strategies among different authors, misconceptions about meta-analyses themselves, and misconceptions about the comparability of different types of stem cells with regard to their safety and regenerative potential. An independent, systematic review of the literature yielded a total of 183 studies, of which 33 were randomized clinical trials, including a total of 6860 patients with pkOA. However, it was not possible to perform a scientifically sound meta-analysis. (4) Conclusions: Clinicians should interpret the results of the 19 assessed meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells with caution and should be cautious of the conclusions drawn therein. Clinicians and researchers should strive to participate in FDA and/or EMA reviewed and approved clinical trials to provide clinically and statistically valid efficacy. MDPI 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8946093/ /pubmed/35326416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11060965 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Schmitz, Christoph
Alt, Christopher
Pearce, David A.
Furia, John P.
Maffulli, Nicola
Alt, Eckhard U.
Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review
title Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review
title_full Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review
title_short Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review
title_sort methodological flaws in meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of knee osteoarthritis with stem cells: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35326416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11060965
work_keys_str_mv AT schmitzchristoph methodologicalflawsinmetaanalysesofclinicalstudiesonthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritiswithstemcellsasystematicreview
AT altchristopher methodologicalflawsinmetaanalysesofclinicalstudiesonthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritiswithstemcellsasystematicreview
AT pearcedavida methodologicalflawsinmetaanalysesofclinicalstudiesonthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritiswithstemcellsasystematicreview
AT furiajohnp methodologicalflawsinmetaanalysesofclinicalstudiesonthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritiswithstemcellsasystematicreview
AT maffullinicola methodologicalflawsinmetaanalysesofclinicalstudiesonthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritiswithstemcellsasystematicreview
AT alteckhardu methodologicalflawsinmetaanalysesofclinicalstudiesonthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritiswithstemcellsasystematicreview