Cargando…

813 Histologic Changes of Skin Biopsies After Autologous Skin Cell Suspension

INTRODUCTION: Over 10,000 cases of autologous skin cell suspension have been performed around the world for the treatment of burn and soft tissue injuries. A key component of the procedure is the harvest of skin biopsies which are exposed to enzymatic degradation. In some regions, epidermal graft ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lennard, Shana, Carter, Jeffrey E, Kopari, Nicole M, Cook, Michael, Paige, John, Hodgdon, Ian, Phelan, Herb A, Hickerson, William L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946136/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.361
_version_ 1784674122667655168
author Lennard, Shana
Carter, Jeffrey E
Kopari, Nicole M
Cook, Michael
Paige, John
Hodgdon, Ian
Phelan, Herb A
Hickerson, William L
author_facet Lennard, Shana
Carter, Jeffrey E
Kopari, Nicole M
Cook, Michael
Paige, John
Hodgdon, Ian
Phelan, Herb A
Hickerson, William L
author_sort Lennard, Shana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over 10,000 cases of autologous skin cell suspension have been performed around the world for the treatment of burn and soft tissue injuries. A key component of the procedure is the harvest of skin biopsies which are exposed to enzymatic degradation. In some regions, epidermal graft harvest has been attempted manually without enzymatic degradation. Our study goal was to examine the histologic changes of the skin biopsies in manual versus enzymatic degradation. METHODS: Our study was an IRB-approved, prospective controlled analysis of residual skin harvested from 10 patients undergoing hernia repair. Two specimens from each patient were procured intraoperatively with each measuring 2x3cm. Each specimen produced two 4mm punch biopsies from three regions (control, mechanical, and enzymatic) for a total of 12 specimens per patient. Enzymatic specimens were prepared using the Avita Medical ReCell® system per manufacture instructions for use. Mechanical specimens were prepared using an abrasive pad until epidermis was macroscopically removed. Histologic analysis was performed with hematoxylin and eosin stain and whole slide scanning. Two or more investigators reviewed each biopsy concurrently with consensus agreement on the remaining epidermis and evidence of degraded reticular dermis. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the variances in the three groups. RESULTS: The mean residual epidermis was 9% in the enzymatic group, 35% in the mechanical, and 98% in the control. Epidermal harvest was higher in the enzymatic group relative to the mechanical group (two tailed t-test = 0.0008). Reticular dermis was degraded in 10% of the mechanical specimens and none of the enzymatic specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Epidermal harvest was more consistent in the enzymatic group with less trauma to the dermis. Our study suggest that mechanical harvest requires larger donor sites given the decreased epidermal harvest. Further research is needed to determine impact of cell isolation technique on autograft cell suspension viability and distribution of cell types harvested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8946136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89461362022-03-28 813 Histologic Changes of Skin Biopsies After Autologous Skin Cell Suspension Lennard, Shana Carter, Jeffrey E Kopari, Nicole M Cook, Michael Paige, John Hodgdon, Ian Phelan, Herb A Hickerson, William L J Burn Care Res Translational Sciences: Wounds & Scars 2 INTRODUCTION: Over 10,000 cases of autologous skin cell suspension have been performed around the world for the treatment of burn and soft tissue injuries. A key component of the procedure is the harvest of skin biopsies which are exposed to enzymatic degradation. In some regions, epidermal graft harvest has been attempted manually without enzymatic degradation. Our study goal was to examine the histologic changes of the skin biopsies in manual versus enzymatic degradation. METHODS: Our study was an IRB-approved, prospective controlled analysis of residual skin harvested from 10 patients undergoing hernia repair. Two specimens from each patient were procured intraoperatively with each measuring 2x3cm. Each specimen produced two 4mm punch biopsies from three regions (control, mechanical, and enzymatic) for a total of 12 specimens per patient. Enzymatic specimens were prepared using the Avita Medical ReCell® system per manufacture instructions for use. Mechanical specimens were prepared using an abrasive pad until epidermis was macroscopically removed. Histologic analysis was performed with hematoxylin and eosin stain and whole slide scanning. Two or more investigators reviewed each biopsy concurrently with consensus agreement on the remaining epidermis and evidence of degraded reticular dermis. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the variances in the three groups. RESULTS: The mean residual epidermis was 9% in the enzymatic group, 35% in the mechanical, and 98% in the control. Epidermal harvest was higher in the enzymatic group relative to the mechanical group (two tailed t-test = 0.0008). Reticular dermis was degraded in 10% of the mechanical specimens and none of the enzymatic specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Epidermal harvest was more consistent in the enzymatic group with less trauma to the dermis. Our study suggest that mechanical harvest requires larger donor sites given the decreased epidermal harvest. Further research is needed to determine impact of cell isolation technique on autograft cell suspension viability and distribution of cell types harvested. Oxford University Press 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8946136/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.361 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Translational Sciences: Wounds & Scars 2
Lennard, Shana
Carter, Jeffrey E
Kopari, Nicole M
Cook, Michael
Paige, John
Hodgdon, Ian
Phelan, Herb A
Hickerson, William L
813 Histologic Changes of Skin Biopsies After Autologous Skin Cell Suspension
title 813 Histologic Changes of Skin Biopsies After Autologous Skin Cell Suspension
title_full 813 Histologic Changes of Skin Biopsies After Autologous Skin Cell Suspension
title_fullStr 813 Histologic Changes of Skin Biopsies After Autologous Skin Cell Suspension
title_full_unstemmed 813 Histologic Changes of Skin Biopsies After Autologous Skin Cell Suspension
title_short 813 Histologic Changes of Skin Biopsies After Autologous Skin Cell Suspension
title_sort 813 histologic changes of skin biopsies after autologous skin cell suspension
topic Translational Sciences: Wounds & Scars 2
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946136/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac012.361
work_keys_str_mv AT lennardshana 813histologicchangesofskinbiopsiesafterautologousskincellsuspension
AT carterjeffreye 813histologicchangesofskinbiopsiesafterautologousskincellsuspension
AT koparinicolem 813histologicchangesofskinbiopsiesafterautologousskincellsuspension
AT cookmichael 813histologicchangesofskinbiopsiesafterautologousskincellsuspension
AT paigejohn 813histologicchangesofskinbiopsiesafterautologousskincellsuspension
AT hodgdonian 813histologicchangesofskinbiopsiesafterautologousskincellsuspension
AT phelanherba 813histologicchangesofskinbiopsiesafterautologousskincellsuspension
AT hickersonwilliaml 813histologicchangesofskinbiopsiesafterautologousskincellsuspension