Extramedullary Infiltration in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia on Surveillance Magnetic Resonance Imaging and its Relationship With Established Risk Factors

PURPOSE: Extramedullary infiltration (EMI) is a rare condition defined by the accumulation of myeloid tumor cells beyond the bone marrow. The clinical significance is still controversial. This study was aimed to evaluate the incidence, characteristics, and prognostic significance of EMI on complete magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigation in newly diagnosed pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are asymptomatic without clinical evidence to suspect EMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective clinical and radiologic review of 121 patients with MRI examination at the time of initial diagnosis of AML without any clinical evidence suggestive of EMI was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of EMI, and the relationship between EMI and established risk factors was analyzed. Initial white blood cell count, the occurrence of an event (including relapse, death, and primary refractory disease), survival status, and detailed information on cytogenetic/molecular status was performed by a thorough review of electronic medical records system. All patients underwent full imaging evaluation with the contrast-enhanced whole body and some regional MRI at the time of initial diagnosis. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 10.77 years (range, 0.37 to 18.83 y). Based on the risk stratification system of AML, 36, 45, and 40 patients are classified as low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. MRI at the time of the initial diagnosis of AML revealed 35 of 121 patients (28.9%) with EMI. The most common site of EMI was a skull, followed by the lower extremity bone and meninges of the brain. The median age at diagnosis was significantly younger in patients with EMI (7.87 vs. 11.08 y, P=0.0212). Low incidence of FLT3/ITD mutation, low incidence of AML-ETO gene rearrangement, and the larger extent and more severe degree of bone marrow involvement was related with EMI. However, there was no significant prognostic difference in event-free survival and overall survival regardless of the presence of EMI in the overall patient population and each risk group. The location of EMI occurrence was also not related to prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Even if EMI symptoms are not evident, surveillance MRI scans at the initial diagnosis of pediatric AML patients are very helpful in detecting a significant number of EMIs. Younger age, some molecular features, and more severe bone marrow involvement of AML patients were related with EMI. However, there was no significant prognostic difference between patients with or without EMI regardless of risk group. Further prospective investigation is necessary to validate the prognostic effect of EMI in a larger group of patients with different risk groups.