Cargando…
Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Comparison to the Treatment of Unipolar Depression in a Naturalistic Setting
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in the treatment of depression. However, for the subset of patients with bipolar disorder, less data is available and overall strength of evidence is weaker than for its use in unipolar depression. A cohort of 505 patients (of which 46...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35326255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030298 |
_version_ | 1784674242778890240 |
---|---|
author | Alhelali, Abdullah Almheiri, Eisa Abdelnaim, Mohamed Weber, Franziska C. Langguth, Berthold Schecklmann, Martin Hebel, Tobias |
author_facet | Alhelali, Abdullah Almheiri, Eisa Abdelnaim, Mohamed Weber, Franziska C. Langguth, Berthold Schecklmann, Martin Hebel, Tobias |
author_sort | Alhelali, Abdullah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in the treatment of depression. However, for the subset of patients with bipolar disorder, less data is available and overall strength of evidence is weaker than for its use in unipolar depression. A cohort of 505 patients (of which 46 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder) with depression who were treated with rTMS were analyzed retrospectively with regards to their response to several weeks of treatment. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) was assessed as main outcome. Unipolar and bipolar patients with depression did not differ significantly in baseline demographic variables or severity of depression. Both groups did not differ significantly in their response to treatment as indicated by absolute and relative changes in the HDRS and response and remission rates. On HDRS subitem-analysis, bipolar patients showed superior amelioration of the symptom “paranoid symptoms” in a statistically significant manner. In conclusion, depressed patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder benefit from rTMS in a similar fashion as patients with unipolar depression in a naturalistic setting. rTMS might be more effective in reducing paranoia in bipolar than in unipolar patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8946641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89466412022-03-25 Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Comparison to the Treatment of Unipolar Depression in a Naturalistic Setting Alhelali, Abdullah Almheiri, Eisa Abdelnaim, Mohamed Weber, Franziska C. Langguth, Berthold Schecklmann, Martin Hebel, Tobias Brain Sci Article Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in the treatment of depression. However, for the subset of patients with bipolar disorder, less data is available and overall strength of evidence is weaker than for its use in unipolar depression. A cohort of 505 patients (of which 46 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder) with depression who were treated with rTMS were analyzed retrospectively with regards to their response to several weeks of treatment. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) was assessed as main outcome. Unipolar and bipolar patients with depression did not differ significantly in baseline demographic variables or severity of depression. Both groups did not differ significantly in their response to treatment as indicated by absolute and relative changes in the HDRS and response and remission rates. On HDRS subitem-analysis, bipolar patients showed superior amelioration of the symptom “paranoid symptoms” in a statistically significant manner. In conclusion, depressed patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder benefit from rTMS in a similar fashion as patients with unipolar depression in a naturalistic setting. rTMS might be more effective in reducing paranoia in bipolar than in unipolar patients. MDPI 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8946641/ /pubmed/35326255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030298 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alhelali, Abdullah Almheiri, Eisa Abdelnaim, Mohamed Weber, Franziska C. Langguth, Berthold Schecklmann, Martin Hebel, Tobias Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Comparison to the Treatment of Unipolar Depression in a Naturalistic Setting |
title | Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Comparison to the Treatment of Unipolar Depression in a Naturalistic Setting |
title_full | Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Comparison to the Treatment of Unipolar Depression in a Naturalistic Setting |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Comparison to the Treatment of Unipolar Depression in a Naturalistic Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Comparison to the Treatment of Unipolar Depression in a Naturalistic Setting |
title_short | Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Comparison to the Treatment of Unipolar Depression in a Naturalistic Setting |
title_sort | effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of bipolar disorder in comparison to the treatment of unipolar depression in a naturalistic setting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35326255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alhelaliabdullah effectivenessofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofbipolardisorderincomparisontothetreatmentofunipolardepressioninanaturalisticsetting AT almheirieisa effectivenessofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofbipolardisorderincomparisontothetreatmentofunipolardepressioninanaturalisticsetting AT abdelnaimmohamed effectivenessofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofbipolardisorderincomparisontothetreatmentofunipolardepressioninanaturalisticsetting AT weberfranziskac effectivenessofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofbipolardisorderincomparisontothetreatmentofunipolardepressioninanaturalisticsetting AT langguthberthold effectivenessofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofbipolardisorderincomparisontothetreatmentofunipolardepressioninanaturalisticsetting AT schecklmannmartin effectivenessofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofbipolardisorderincomparisontothetreatmentofunipolardepressioninanaturalisticsetting AT hebeltobias effectivenessofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofbipolardisorderincomparisontothetreatmentofunipolardepressioninanaturalisticsetting |