Cargando…
Evaluation of a Dragons’ Den–inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in Quebec, Canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys
BACKGROUND: On May 24, 2017, the Quebec College of Family Physicians held an innovation symposium inspired by the television show Dragons’ Den, at which innovators pitched their innovations to Dragon-Facilitators (i.e., decision-makers) and academic family medicine clinical leads. We evaluated the e...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Impact Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35318248 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200251 |
_version_ | 1784674243246555136 |
---|---|
author | Smithman, Mélanie Ann Dumas-Pilon, Maxine Campbell, Marie-Josée Breton, Mylaine |
author_facet | Smithman, Mélanie Ann Dumas-Pilon, Maxine Campbell, Marie-Josée Breton, Mylaine |
author_sort | Smithman, Mélanie Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: On May 24, 2017, the Quebec College of Family Physicians held an innovation symposium inspired by the television show Dragons’ Den, at which innovators pitched their innovations to Dragon-Facilitators (i.e., decision-makers) and academic family medicine clinical leads. We evaluated the effects of the symposium on the spread of primary health care innovations. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the symposium. We collected data related to Rogers’ innovation-decision process using 3 quality-improvement e-surveys (distributed between May 2017 and February 2018). The first survey evaluated spread outputs (innovation discovery, intention to spread, improvements) and was sent to all participants immediately after the symposium. The second evaluated short-term spread outcomes (follow-ups, successes, barriers) and was sent to innovators 3 months after the symposium. The third evaluated medium-term spread outcomes (spread, perceived impact) and was sent to innovators and clinical leads 9 months after the symposium. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, content analysis and joint display. RESULTS: Fifty-one innovators, 66 clinical leads (representing 42 clinics) and 37 Dragon-Facilitators attended the symposium. The response rates for the surveys were 61% (82/134) for the immediate post-symposium survey of all participants; 68% (21/31) for the 3-month survey of innovators; and 49% (48/97) for the 9-month survey of clinical leads and innovators. Immediately after the symposium, clinical leads and Dragon-Facilitators reported a high likelihood of adopting an innovation (mean ± standard deviation 8.02 ± 1.63 on a 10-point Likert scale) and 87% (53/61) agreed that they had discovered innovations at the symposium. Nearly all innovators (95%, 20/21) intended to follow up with potential adopters. After 3 months, 62% (13/21) of innovators had followed up in some way. After 9 months, 72% of clinical leads (18/25) had implemented at least 1 innovation, and 52% of innovators (12/23) had spread or were in the process of spreading innovations. INTERPRETATION: The innovation symposium supported participants in achieving the early stages of spreading primary health care innovations. Replicating such symposia may help spread other health care innovations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8946644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | CMA Impact Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89466442022-03-26 Evaluation of a Dragons’ Den–inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in Quebec, Canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys Smithman, Mélanie Ann Dumas-Pilon, Maxine Campbell, Marie-Josée Breton, Mylaine CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: On May 24, 2017, the Quebec College of Family Physicians held an innovation symposium inspired by the television show Dragons’ Den, at which innovators pitched their innovations to Dragon-Facilitators (i.e., decision-makers) and academic family medicine clinical leads. We evaluated the effects of the symposium on the spread of primary health care innovations. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the symposium. We collected data related to Rogers’ innovation-decision process using 3 quality-improvement e-surveys (distributed between May 2017 and February 2018). The first survey evaluated spread outputs (innovation discovery, intention to spread, improvements) and was sent to all participants immediately after the symposium. The second evaluated short-term spread outcomes (follow-ups, successes, barriers) and was sent to innovators 3 months after the symposium. The third evaluated medium-term spread outcomes (spread, perceived impact) and was sent to innovators and clinical leads 9 months after the symposium. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, content analysis and joint display. RESULTS: Fifty-one innovators, 66 clinical leads (representing 42 clinics) and 37 Dragon-Facilitators attended the symposium. The response rates for the surveys were 61% (82/134) for the immediate post-symposium survey of all participants; 68% (21/31) for the 3-month survey of innovators; and 49% (48/97) for the 9-month survey of clinical leads and innovators. Immediately after the symposium, clinical leads and Dragon-Facilitators reported a high likelihood of adopting an innovation (mean ± standard deviation 8.02 ± 1.63 on a 10-point Likert scale) and 87% (53/61) agreed that they had discovered innovations at the symposium. Nearly all innovators (95%, 20/21) intended to follow up with potential adopters. After 3 months, 62% (13/21) of innovators had followed up in some way. After 9 months, 72% of clinical leads (18/25) had implemented at least 1 innovation, and 52% of innovators (12/23) had spread or were in the process of spreading innovations. INTERPRETATION: The innovation symposium supported participants in achieving the early stages of spreading primary health care innovations. Replicating such symposia may help spread other health care innovations. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8946644/ /pubmed/35318248 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200251 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Smithman, Mélanie Ann Dumas-Pilon, Maxine Campbell, Marie-Josée Breton, Mylaine Evaluation of a Dragons’ Den–inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in Quebec, Canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys |
title | Evaluation of a Dragons’ Den–inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in Quebec, Canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys |
title_full | Evaluation of a Dragons’ Den–inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in Quebec, Canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Dragons’ Den–inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in Quebec, Canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Dragons’ Den–inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in Quebec, Canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys |
title_short | Evaluation of a Dragons’ Den–inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in Quebec, Canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys |
title_sort | evaluation of a dragons’ den–inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in quebec, canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35318248 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithmanmelanieann evaluationofadragonsdeninspiredsymposiumtospreadprimaryhealthcareinnovationsinquebeccanadaamixedmethodsstudyusingqualityimprovementesurveys AT dumaspilonmaxine evaluationofadragonsdeninspiredsymposiumtospreadprimaryhealthcareinnovationsinquebeccanadaamixedmethodsstudyusingqualityimprovementesurveys AT campbellmariejosee evaluationofadragonsdeninspiredsymposiumtospreadprimaryhealthcareinnovationsinquebeccanadaamixedmethodsstudyusingqualityimprovementesurveys AT bretonmylaine evaluationofadragonsdeninspiredsymposiumtospreadprimaryhealthcareinnovationsinquebeccanadaamixedmethodsstudyusingqualityimprovementesurveys |