Cargando…

Pilot Testing of the “Turbidimeter”, a Simple, Universal Reader Intended to Complement and Enhance Bacterial Growth Detection in Manual Blood Culture Systems in Low-Resource Settings

Bloodstream infections and antimicrobial resistance are an increasing problem in low-income countries. There is a clear need for adapted diagnostic tools. To address this need, we developed a simple, universal reader prototype that detects bacterial growth in blood culture bottles. Our “turbidimeter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbé, Barbara, Corsmit, Ellen, Jans, Jasper, Kaur, Kamalpreet, Baets, Roel, Jacobs, Jan, Hardy, Liselotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328168
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030615
_version_ 1784674292298940416
author Barbé, Barbara
Corsmit, Ellen
Jans, Jasper
Kaur, Kamalpreet
Baets, Roel
Jacobs, Jan
Hardy, Liselotte
author_facet Barbé, Barbara
Corsmit, Ellen
Jans, Jasper
Kaur, Kamalpreet
Baets, Roel
Jacobs, Jan
Hardy, Liselotte
author_sort Barbé, Barbara
collection PubMed
description Bloodstream infections and antimicrobial resistance are an increasing problem in low-income countries. There is a clear need for adapted diagnostic tools. To address this need, we developed a simple, universal reader prototype that detects bacterial growth in blood culture bottles. Our “turbidimeter” evaluates bacterial growth, based on the turbidity of the broth and the color change of the colorimetric CO(2) indicator in commercially available blood culture bottles. A total of 60 measurements were performed using 10 relevant microbial species, spiked in horse blood, to compare the turbidimeter’s performance with that of an automatic reference system. The turbidimeter was able to detect growth in all but one of the spiked blood culture bottles. In the majority (7/10) of the species tested, time-to-detection of the turbidimeter was shown to be non-inferior to the reference automated time-to-detection. This was, however, only the case when both the turbidity and color change in the colorimetric CO(2)-indicator were used to evaluate growth. We could not demonstrate the non-inferiority of the turbidity measurement alone. Overall, the turbidimeter performed well, but we also identified some improvements that will be implemented in the next version of the prototype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8946860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89468602022-03-25 Pilot Testing of the “Turbidimeter”, a Simple, Universal Reader Intended to Complement and Enhance Bacterial Growth Detection in Manual Blood Culture Systems in Low-Resource Settings Barbé, Barbara Corsmit, Ellen Jans, Jasper Kaur, Kamalpreet Baets, Roel Jacobs, Jan Hardy, Liselotte Diagnostics (Basel) Article Bloodstream infections and antimicrobial resistance are an increasing problem in low-income countries. There is a clear need for adapted diagnostic tools. To address this need, we developed a simple, universal reader prototype that detects bacterial growth in blood culture bottles. Our “turbidimeter” evaluates bacterial growth, based on the turbidity of the broth and the color change of the colorimetric CO(2) indicator in commercially available blood culture bottles. A total of 60 measurements were performed using 10 relevant microbial species, spiked in horse blood, to compare the turbidimeter’s performance with that of an automatic reference system. The turbidimeter was able to detect growth in all but one of the spiked blood culture bottles. In the majority (7/10) of the species tested, time-to-detection of the turbidimeter was shown to be non-inferior to the reference automated time-to-detection. This was, however, only the case when both the turbidity and color change in the colorimetric CO(2)-indicator were used to evaluate growth. We could not demonstrate the non-inferiority of the turbidity measurement alone. Overall, the turbidimeter performed well, but we also identified some improvements that will be implemented in the next version of the prototype. MDPI 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8946860/ /pubmed/35328168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030615 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barbé, Barbara
Corsmit, Ellen
Jans, Jasper
Kaur, Kamalpreet
Baets, Roel
Jacobs, Jan
Hardy, Liselotte
Pilot Testing of the “Turbidimeter”, a Simple, Universal Reader Intended to Complement and Enhance Bacterial Growth Detection in Manual Blood Culture Systems in Low-Resource Settings
title Pilot Testing of the “Turbidimeter”, a Simple, Universal Reader Intended to Complement and Enhance Bacterial Growth Detection in Manual Blood Culture Systems in Low-Resource Settings
title_full Pilot Testing of the “Turbidimeter”, a Simple, Universal Reader Intended to Complement and Enhance Bacterial Growth Detection in Manual Blood Culture Systems in Low-Resource Settings
title_fullStr Pilot Testing of the “Turbidimeter”, a Simple, Universal Reader Intended to Complement and Enhance Bacterial Growth Detection in Manual Blood Culture Systems in Low-Resource Settings
title_full_unstemmed Pilot Testing of the “Turbidimeter”, a Simple, Universal Reader Intended to Complement and Enhance Bacterial Growth Detection in Manual Blood Culture Systems in Low-Resource Settings
title_short Pilot Testing of the “Turbidimeter”, a Simple, Universal Reader Intended to Complement and Enhance Bacterial Growth Detection in Manual Blood Culture Systems in Low-Resource Settings
title_sort pilot testing of the “turbidimeter”, a simple, universal reader intended to complement and enhance bacterial growth detection in manual blood culture systems in low-resource settings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328168
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030615
work_keys_str_mv AT barbebarbara pilottestingoftheturbidimeterasimpleuniversalreaderintendedtocomplementandenhancebacterialgrowthdetectioninmanualbloodculturesystemsinlowresourcesettings
AT corsmitellen pilottestingoftheturbidimeterasimpleuniversalreaderintendedtocomplementandenhancebacterialgrowthdetectioninmanualbloodculturesystemsinlowresourcesettings
AT jansjasper pilottestingoftheturbidimeterasimpleuniversalreaderintendedtocomplementandenhancebacterialgrowthdetectioninmanualbloodculturesystemsinlowresourcesettings
AT kaurkamalpreet pilottestingoftheturbidimeterasimpleuniversalreaderintendedtocomplementandenhancebacterialgrowthdetectioninmanualbloodculturesystemsinlowresourcesettings
AT baetsroel pilottestingoftheturbidimeterasimpleuniversalreaderintendedtocomplementandenhancebacterialgrowthdetectioninmanualbloodculturesystemsinlowresourcesettings
AT jacobsjan pilottestingoftheturbidimeterasimpleuniversalreaderintendedtocomplementandenhancebacterialgrowthdetectioninmanualbloodculturesystemsinlowresourcesettings
AT hardyliselotte pilottestingoftheturbidimeterasimpleuniversalreaderintendedtocomplementandenhancebacterialgrowthdetectioninmanualbloodculturesystemsinlowresourcesettings