Virtual Non-Contrast Reconstructions of Photon-Counting Detector CT Angiography Datasets as Substitutes for True Non-Contrast Acquisitions in Patients after EVAR—Performance of a Novel Calcium-Preserving Reconstruction Algorithm

The purpose of this study was to evaluate virtual-non contrast reconstructions of Photon-Counting Detector (PCD) CT-angiography datasets using a novel calcium-preserving algorithm (VNC(PC)) vs. the standard algorithm (VNC(Conv)) for their potential to replace unenhanced acquisitions (TNC) in patients after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). 20 EVAR patients who had undergone CTA (unenhanced and arterial phase) on a novel PCD-CT were included. VNC(Conv)- and VNC(PC)-series were derived from CTA-datasets and intraluminal signal and noise compared. Three readers evaluated image quality, contrast removal, and removal of calcifications/stent parts and assessed all VNC-series for their suitability to replace TNC-series. Image noise was higher in VNC- than in TNC-series (18.6 ± 5.3 HU, 16.7 ± 7.1 HU, and 14.9 ± 7.1 HU for VNC(Conv)-, VNC(PC)-, and TNC-series, p = 0.006). Subjective image quality was substantially higher in VNC(PC)- than VNC(Conv)-series (4.2 ± 0.9 vs. 2.5 ± 0.6; p < 0.001). Aortic contrast removal was complete in all VNC-series. Unlike in VNC(Conv)-reconstructions, only minuscule parts of stents or calcifications were erroneously subtracted in VNC(PC)-reconstructions. Readers considered 95% of VNC(PC)-series fully or mostly suited to replace TNC-series; for VNC(Conv)-reconstructions, however, only 75% were considered mostly (and none fully) suited for TNC-replacement. VNC(PC)-reconstructions of PCD-CT-angiography datasets have excellent image quality with complete contrast removal and only minimal erroneous subtractions of stent parts/calcifications. They could replace TNC-series in almost all cases.