Cargando…
What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review
Purpose: to determine management problems of ovarian masses in girls in order to form a baseline for prospective randomized studies of the established topics and quality improvement of our management. Materials and Methods: We performed a national analysis of clinical aspects of ovarian masses in gi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35323325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29030125 |
_version_ | 1784674297622560768 |
---|---|
author | Łuczak, Justyna Bagłaj, Maciej Dryjański, Piotr Kalcowska, Alicja Banaszyk-Pucała, Nastazja Boczar, Maria Dymek, Krzysztof Fryczek, Małgorzata Giżewska-Kacprzak, Kaja Górecki, Wojciech Grabowski, Andrzej Gregor, Anna Jabłońska, Maria Kowalewski, Grzegorz Lewandowska, Magdalena Małowiecka, Maria Ogorzałek, Anna Pękalska, Magdalena Piotrowska-Gall, Aneta Porębski, Mateusz Siewiński, Marek Patkowski, Dariusz |
author_facet | Łuczak, Justyna Bagłaj, Maciej Dryjański, Piotr Kalcowska, Alicja Banaszyk-Pucała, Nastazja Boczar, Maria Dymek, Krzysztof Fryczek, Małgorzata Giżewska-Kacprzak, Kaja Górecki, Wojciech Grabowski, Andrzej Gregor, Anna Jabłońska, Maria Kowalewski, Grzegorz Lewandowska, Magdalena Małowiecka, Maria Ogorzałek, Anna Pękalska, Magdalena Piotrowska-Gall, Aneta Porębski, Mateusz Siewiński, Marek Patkowski, Dariusz |
author_sort | Łuczak, Justyna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: to determine management problems of ovarian masses in girls in order to form a baseline for prospective randomized studies of the established topics and quality improvement of our management. Materials and Methods: We performed a national analysis of clinical aspects of ovarian masses in girls operated on in Poland, analyzed retrospectively medical files of all consecutive patients aged 0–18 who underwent surgeries for ovarian lesions between 2012 and 2017 at 17 pediatric surgical departments and complemented the analysis with a scoping review of a recent primary research related to ovarian masses in children. Results: The study group comprised 595 patients. Forty-four (7.39%) girls were diagnosed with malignant tumors. The overall preservation rate was 64.54%. The analysis revealed that positive tumor markers (OR = 10.3), lesions larger than 6 cm (OR = 4.17) and solid mass on ultrasound examination (OR = 5.34) are interdependent variables differentiating malignant tumors from non-malignant lesions ([Formula: see text] = 79.1; p = 0.00000). Our scoping review revealed 10 major branches of research within the topic of ovarian masses in pediatric population. Conclusions: We have developed an overview of the field with the emphasis on the local environment. Our next step is a multi-institutional prospective study of a quality improvement project implementation based on the obtained knowledge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8946882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89468822022-03-25 What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review Łuczak, Justyna Bagłaj, Maciej Dryjański, Piotr Kalcowska, Alicja Banaszyk-Pucała, Nastazja Boczar, Maria Dymek, Krzysztof Fryczek, Małgorzata Giżewska-Kacprzak, Kaja Górecki, Wojciech Grabowski, Andrzej Gregor, Anna Jabłońska, Maria Kowalewski, Grzegorz Lewandowska, Magdalena Małowiecka, Maria Ogorzałek, Anna Pękalska, Magdalena Piotrowska-Gall, Aneta Porębski, Mateusz Siewiński, Marek Patkowski, Dariusz Curr Oncol Article Purpose: to determine management problems of ovarian masses in girls in order to form a baseline for prospective randomized studies of the established topics and quality improvement of our management. Materials and Methods: We performed a national analysis of clinical aspects of ovarian masses in girls operated on in Poland, analyzed retrospectively medical files of all consecutive patients aged 0–18 who underwent surgeries for ovarian lesions between 2012 and 2017 at 17 pediatric surgical departments and complemented the analysis with a scoping review of a recent primary research related to ovarian masses in children. Results: The study group comprised 595 patients. Forty-four (7.39%) girls were diagnosed with malignant tumors. The overall preservation rate was 64.54%. The analysis revealed that positive tumor markers (OR = 10.3), lesions larger than 6 cm (OR = 4.17) and solid mass on ultrasound examination (OR = 5.34) are interdependent variables differentiating malignant tumors from non-malignant lesions ([Formula: see text] = 79.1; p = 0.00000). Our scoping review revealed 10 major branches of research within the topic of ovarian masses in pediatric population. Conclusions: We have developed an overview of the field with the emphasis on the local environment. Our next step is a multi-institutional prospective study of a quality improvement project implementation based on the obtained knowledge. MDPI 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8946882/ /pubmed/35323325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29030125 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Łuczak, Justyna Bagłaj, Maciej Dryjański, Piotr Kalcowska, Alicja Banaszyk-Pucała, Nastazja Boczar, Maria Dymek, Krzysztof Fryczek, Małgorzata Giżewska-Kacprzak, Kaja Górecki, Wojciech Grabowski, Andrzej Gregor, Anna Jabłońska, Maria Kowalewski, Grzegorz Lewandowska, Magdalena Małowiecka, Maria Ogorzałek, Anna Pękalska, Magdalena Piotrowska-Gall, Aneta Porębski, Mateusz Siewiński, Marek Patkowski, Dariusz What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review |
title | What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review |
title_full | What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review |
title_fullStr | What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review |
title_short | What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review |
title_sort | what should be the topics of a prospective study on ovarian masses in children?—results of a multicenter retrospective study and a scoping literature review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35323325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29030125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT łuczakjustyna whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT bagłajmaciej whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT dryjanskipiotr whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT kalcowskaalicja whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT banaszykpucałanastazja whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT boczarmaria whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT dymekkrzysztof whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT fryczekmałgorzata whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT gizewskakacprzakkaja whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT goreckiwojciech whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT grabowskiandrzej whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT gregoranna whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT jabłonskamaria whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT kowalewskigrzegorz whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT lewandowskamagdalena whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT małowieckamaria whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT ogorzałekanna whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT pekalskamagdalena whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT piotrowskagallaneta whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT porebskimateusz whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT siewinskimarek whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview AT patkowskidariusz whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview |