Cargando…

What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review

Purpose: to determine management problems of ovarian masses in girls in order to form a baseline for prospective randomized studies of the established topics and quality improvement of our management. Materials and Methods: We performed a national analysis of clinical aspects of ovarian masses in gi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Łuczak, Justyna, Bagłaj, Maciej, Dryjański, Piotr, Kalcowska, Alicja, Banaszyk-Pucała, Nastazja, Boczar, Maria, Dymek, Krzysztof, Fryczek, Małgorzata, Giżewska-Kacprzak, Kaja, Górecki, Wojciech, Grabowski, Andrzej, Gregor, Anna, Jabłońska, Maria, Kowalewski, Grzegorz, Lewandowska, Magdalena, Małowiecka, Maria, Ogorzałek, Anna, Pękalska, Magdalena, Piotrowska-Gall, Aneta, Porębski, Mateusz, Siewiński, Marek, Patkowski, Dariusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35323325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29030125
_version_ 1784674297622560768
author Łuczak, Justyna
Bagłaj, Maciej
Dryjański, Piotr
Kalcowska, Alicja
Banaszyk-Pucała, Nastazja
Boczar, Maria
Dymek, Krzysztof
Fryczek, Małgorzata
Giżewska-Kacprzak, Kaja
Górecki, Wojciech
Grabowski, Andrzej
Gregor, Anna
Jabłońska, Maria
Kowalewski, Grzegorz
Lewandowska, Magdalena
Małowiecka, Maria
Ogorzałek, Anna
Pękalska, Magdalena
Piotrowska-Gall, Aneta
Porębski, Mateusz
Siewiński, Marek
Patkowski, Dariusz
author_facet Łuczak, Justyna
Bagłaj, Maciej
Dryjański, Piotr
Kalcowska, Alicja
Banaszyk-Pucała, Nastazja
Boczar, Maria
Dymek, Krzysztof
Fryczek, Małgorzata
Giżewska-Kacprzak, Kaja
Górecki, Wojciech
Grabowski, Andrzej
Gregor, Anna
Jabłońska, Maria
Kowalewski, Grzegorz
Lewandowska, Magdalena
Małowiecka, Maria
Ogorzałek, Anna
Pękalska, Magdalena
Piotrowska-Gall, Aneta
Porębski, Mateusz
Siewiński, Marek
Patkowski, Dariusz
author_sort Łuczak, Justyna
collection PubMed
description Purpose: to determine management problems of ovarian masses in girls in order to form a baseline for prospective randomized studies of the established topics and quality improvement of our management. Materials and Methods: We performed a national analysis of clinical aspects of ovarian masses in girls operated on in Poland, analyzed retrospectively medical files of all consecutive patients aged 0–18 who underwent surgeries for ovarian lesions between 2012 and 2017 at 17 pediatric surgical departments and complemented the analysis with a scoping review of a recent primary research related to ovarian masses in children. Results: The study group comprised 595 patients. Forty-four (7.39%) girls were diagnosed with malignant tumors. The overall preservation rate was 64.54%. The analysis revealed that positive tumor markers (OR = 10.3), lesions larger than 6 cm (OR = 4.17) and solid mass on ultrasound examination (OR = 5.34) are interdependent variables differentiating malignant tumors from non-malignant lesions ([Formula: see text] = 79.1; p = 0.00000). Our scoping review revealed 10 major branches of research within the topic of ovarian masses in pediatric population. Conclusions: We have developed an overview of the field with the emphasis on the local environment. Our next step is a multi-institutional prospective study of a quality improvement project implementation based on the obtained knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8946882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89468822022-03-25 What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review Łuczak, Justyna Bagłaj, Maciej Dryjański, Piotr Kalcowska, Alicja Banaszyk-Pucała, Nastazja Boczar, Maria Dymek, Krzysztof Fryczek, Małgorzata Giżewska-Kacprzak, Kaja Górecki, Wojciech Grabowski, Andrzej Gregor, Anna Jabłońska, Maria Kowalewski, Grzegorz Lewandowska, Magdalena Małowiecka, Maria Ogorzałek, Anna Pękalska, Magdalena Piotrowska-Gall, Aneta Porębski, Mateusz Siewiński, Marek Patkowski, Dariusz Curr Oncol Article Purpose: to determine management problems of ovarian masses in girls in order to form a baseline for prospective randomized studies of the established topics and quality improvement of our management. Materials and Methods: We performed a national analysis of clinical aspects of ovarian masses in girls operated on in Poland, analyzed retrospectively medical files of all consecutive patients aged 0–18 who underwent surgeries for ovarian lesions between 2012 and 2017 at 17 pediatric surgical departments and complemented the analysis with a scoping review of a recent primary research related to ovarian masses in children. Results: The study group comprised 595 patients. Forty-four (7.39%) girls were diagnosed with malignant tumors. The overall preservation rate was 64.54%. The analysis revealed that positive tumor markers (OR = 10.3), lesions larger than 6 cm (OR = 4.17) and solid mass on ultrasound examination (OR = 5.34) are interdependent variables differentiating malignant tumors from non-malignant lesions ([Formula: see text] = 79.1; p = 0.00000). Our scoping review revealed 10 major branches of research within the topic of ovarian masses in pediatric population. Conclusions: We have developed an overview of the field with the emphasis on the local environment. Our next step is a multi-institutional prospective study of a quality improvement project implementation based on the obtained knowledge. MDPI 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8946882/ /pubmed/35323325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29030125 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Łuczak, Justyna
Bagłaj, Maciej
Dryjański, Piotr
Kalcowska, Alicja
Banaszyk-Pucała, Nastazja
Boczar, Maria
Dymek, Krzysztof
Fryczek, Małgorzata
Giżewska-Kacprzak, Kaja
Górecki, Wojciech
Grabowski, Andrzej
Gregor, Anna
Jabłońska, Maria
Kowalewski, Grzegorz
Lewandowska, Magdalena
Małowiecka, Maria
Ogorzałek, Anna
Pękalska, Magdalena
Piotrowska-Gall, Aneta
Porębski, Mateusz
Siewiński, Marek
Patkowski, Dariusz
What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review
title What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review
title_full What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review
title_fullStr What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review
title_short What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review
title_sort what should be the topics of a prospective study on ovarian masses in children?—results of a multicenter retrospective study and a scoping literature review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35323325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29030125
work_keys_str_mv AT łuczakjustyna whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT bagłajmaciej whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT dryjanskipiotr whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT kalcowskaalicja whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT banaszykpucałanastazja whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT boczarmaria whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT dymekkrzysztof whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT fryczekmałgorzata whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT gizewskakacprzakkaja whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT goreckiwojciech whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT grabowskiandrzej whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT gregoranna whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT jabłonskamaria whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT kowalewskigrzegorz whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT lewandowskamagdalena whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT małowieckamaria whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT ogorzałekanna whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT pekalskamagdalena whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT piotrowskagallaneta whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT porebskimateusz whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT siewinskimarek whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview
AT patkowskidariusz whatshouldbethetopicsofaprospectivestudyonovarianmassesinchildrenresultsofamulticenterretrospectivestudyandascopingliteraturereview