Cargando…
Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast
We assessed the correlation between liver fat percentage using dual-energy CT (DECT) and Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements in contrast and non-contrast CT. This study included 177 patients in two patient groups: Group A (n = 125) underwent whole body non-contrast DECT and group B (n = 52) had a mult...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030708 |
_version_ | 1784674325785214976 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Jack Junchi Boesen, Mikkel Ranum Hansen, Sofie Lindskov Ulriksen, Peter Sommer Holm, Søren Lönn, Lars Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov |
author_facet | Xu, Jack Junchi Boesen, Mikkel Ranum Hansen, Sofie Lindskov Ulriksen, Peter Sommer Holm, Søren Lönn, Lars Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov |
author_sort | Xu, Jack Junchi |
collection | PubMed |
description | We assessed the correlation between liver fat percentage using dual-energy CT (DECT) and Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements in contrast and non-contrast CT. This study included 177 patients in two patient groups: Group A (n = 125) underwent whole body non-contrast DECT and group B (n = 52) had a multiphasic DECT including a conventional non-contrast CT. Three regions of interest were placed on each image series, one in the left liver lobe and two in the right to measure Hounsfield Units (HU) as well as liver fat percentage. Linear regression analysis was performed for each group as well as combined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to establish the optimal fat percentage threshold value in DECT for predicting a non-contrast threshold of 40 HU correlating to moderate-severe liver steatosis. We found a strong correlation between fat percentage found with DECT and HU measured in non-contrast CT in group A and B individually (R(2) = 0.81 and 0.86, respectively) as well as combined (R(2) = 0.85). No significant difference was found when comparing venous and arterial phase DECT fat percentage measurements in group B (p = 0.67). A threshold of 10% liver fat found with DECT had 95% sensitivity and 95% specificity for the prediction of a 40 HU threshold using non-contrast CT. In conclusion, liver fat quantification using DECT shows high correlation with HU measurements independent of scan phase. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8946969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89469692022-03-25 Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast Xu, Jack Junchi Boesen, Mikkel Ranum Hansen, Sofie Lindskov Ulriksen, Peter Sommer Holm, Søren Lönn, Lars Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov Diagnostics (Basel) Article We assessed the correlation between liver fat percentage using dual-energy CT (DECT) and Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements in contrast and non-contrast CT. This study included 177 patients in two patient groups: Group A (n = 125) underwent whole body non-contrast DECT and group B (n = 52) had a multiphasic DECT including a conventional non-contrast CT. Three regions of interest were placed on each image series, one in the left liver lobe and two in the right to measure Hounsfield Units (HU) as well as liver fat percentage. Linear regression analysis was performed for each group as well as combined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to establish the optimal fat percentage threshold value in DECT for predicting a non-contrast threshold of 40 HU correlating to moderate-severe liver steatosis. We found a strong correlation between fat percentage found with DECT and HU measured in non-contrast CT in group A and B individually (R(2) = 0.81 and 0.86, respectively) as well as combined (R(2) = 0.85). No significant difference was found when comparing venous and arterial phase DECT fat percentage measurements in group B (p = 0.67). A threshold of 10% liver fat found with DECT had 95% sensitivity and 95% specificity for the prediction of a 40 HU threshold using non-contrast CT. In conclusion, liver fat quantification using DECT shows high correlation with HU measurements independent of scan phase. MDPI 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8946969/ /pubmed/35328261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030708 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Xu, Jack Junchi Boesen, Mikkel Ranum Hansen, Sofie Lindskov Ulriksen, Peter Sommer Holm, Søren Lönn, Lars Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast |
title | Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast |
title_full | Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast |
title_short | Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast |
title_sort | assessment of liver fat: dual-energy ct versus conventional ct with and without contrast |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xujackjunchi assessmentofliverfatdualenergyctversusconventionalctwithandwithoutcontrast AT boesenmikkelranum assessmentofliverfatdualenergyctversusconventionalctwithandwithoutcontrast AT hansensofielindskov assessmentofliverfatdualenergyctversusconventionalctwithandwithoutcontrast AT ulriksenpetersommer assessmentofliverfatdualenergyctversusconventionalctwithandwithoutcontrast AT holmsøren assessmentofliverfatdualenergyctversusconventionalctwithandwithoutcontrast AT lonnlars assessmentofliverfatdualenergyctversusconventionalctwithandwithoutcontrast AT hansenkristofferlindskov assessmentofliverfatdualenergyctversusconventionalctwithandwithoutcontrast |