Cargando…

Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area

In this study, we first developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for classifying chest computed tomography (CT) images using the coronavirus disease 2019 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). Subsequently, we evaluated its accuracy by comparing the calculated scores with those assign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishiwata, Yoshinobu, Miura, Kentaro, Kishimoto, Mayuko, Nomura, Koichiro, Sawamura, Shungo, Magami, Shigeru, Ikawa, Mizuki, Yamashiro, Tsuneo, Utsunomiya, Daisuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030738
_version_ 1784674333982982144
author Ishiwata, Yoshinobu
Miura, Kentaro
Kishimoto, Mayuko
Nomura, Koichiro
Sawamura, Shungo
Magami, Shigeru
Ikawa, Mizuki
Yamashiro, Tsuneo
Utsunomiya, Daisuke
author_facet Ishiwata, Yoshinobu
Miura, Kentaro
Kishimoto, Mayuko
Nomura, Koichiro
Sawamura, Shungo
Magami, Shigeru
Ikawa, Mizuki
Yamashiro, Tsuneo
Utsunomiya, Daisuke
author_sort Ishiwata, Yoshinobu
collection PubMed
description In this study, we first developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for classifying chest computed tomography (CT) images using the coronavirus disease 2019 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). Subsequently, we evaluated its accuracy by comparing the calculated scores with those assigned by radiologists with varying levels of experience. This study included patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent chest CT imaging between February and October 2020 in Japan, a non-endemic area. For each chest CT, the CO-RADS scores, determined by consensus among three experienced chest radiologists, were used as the gold standard. Images from 412 patients were used to train the model, whereas images from 83 patients were tested to obtain AI-based CO-RADS scores for each image. Six independent raters (one medical student, two residents, and three board-certified radiologists) evaluated the test images. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and weighted kappa values were calculated to determine the inter-rater agreement with the gold standard. The mean ICC and weighted kappa were 0.754 and 0.752 for the medical student and residents (taken together), 0.851 and 0.850 for the diagnostic radiologists, and 0.913 and 0.912 for AI, respectively. The CO-RADS scores calculated using our AI-based algorithm were comparable to those assigned by radiologists, indicating the accuracy and high reproducibility of our model. Our study findings would enable accurate reading, particularly in areas where radiologists are unavailable, and contribute to improvements in patient management and workflow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8946998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89469982022-03-25 Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area Ishiwata, Yoshinobu Miura, Kentaro Kishimoto, Mayuko Nomura, Koichiro Sawamura, Shungo Magami, Shigeru Ikawa, Mizuki Yamashiro, Tsuneo Utsunomiya, Daisuke Diagnostics (Basel) Article In this study, we first developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for classifying chest computed tomography (CT) images using the coronavirus disease 2019 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). Subsequently, we evaluated its accuracy by comparing the calculated scores with those assigned by radiologists with varying levels of experience. This study included patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent chest CT imaging between February and October 2020 in Japan, a non-endemic area. For each chest CT, the CO-RADS scores, determined by consensus among three experienced chest radiologists, were used as the gold standard. Images from 412 patients were used to train the model, whereas images from 83 patients were tested to obtain AI-based CO-RADS scores for each image. Six independent raters (one medical student, two residents, and three board-certified radiologists) evaluated the test images. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and weighted kappa values were calculated to determine the inter-rater agreement with the gold standard. The mean ICC and weighted kappa were 0.754 and 0.752 for the medical student and residents (taken together), 0.851 and 0.850 for the diagnostic radiologists, and 0.913 and 0.912 for AI, respectively. The CO-RADS scores calculated using our AI-based algorithm were comparable to those assigned by radiologists, indicating the accuracy and high reproducibility of our model. Our study findings would enable accurate reading, particularly in areas where radiologists are unavailable, and contribute to improvements in patient management and workflow. MDPI 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8946998/ /pubmed/35328290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030738 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ishiwata, Yoshinobu
Miura, Kentaro
Kishimoto, Mayuko
Nomura, Koichiro
Sawamura, Shungo
Magami, Shigeru
Ikawa, Mizuki
Yamashiro, Tsuneo
Utsunomiya, Daisuke
Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area
title Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area
title_full Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area
title_fullStr Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area
title_short Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area
title_sort comparison of co-rads scores based on visual and artificial intelligence assessments in a non-endemic area
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030738
work_keys_str_mv AT ishiwatayoshinobu comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea
AT miurakentaro comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea
AT kishimotomayuko comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea
AT nomurakoichiro comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea
AT sawamurashungo comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea
AT magamishigeru comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea
AT ikawamizuki comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea
AT yamashirotsuneo comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea
AT utsunomiyadaisuke comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea