Cargando…
Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area
In this study, we first developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for classifying chest computed tomography (CT) images using the coronavirus disease 2019 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). Subsequently, we evaluated its accuracy by comparing the calculated scores with those assign...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030738 |
_version_ | 1784674333982982144 |
---|---|
author | Ishiwata, Yoshinobu Miura, Kentaro Kishimoto, Mayuko Nomura, Koichiro Sawamura, Shungo Magami, Shigeru Ikawa, Mizuki Yamashiro, Tsuneo Utsunomiya, Daisuke |
author_facet | Ishiwata, Yoshinobu Miura, Kentaro Kishimoto, Mayuko Nomura, Koichiro Sawamura, Shungo Magami, Shigeru Ikawa, Mizuki Yamashiro, Tsuneo Utsunomiya, Daisuke |
author_sort | Ishiwata, Yoshinobu |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we first developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for classifying chest computed tomography (CT) images using the coronavirus disease 2019 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). Subsequently, we evaluated its accuracy by comparing the calculated scores with those assigned by radiologists with varying levels of experience. This study included patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent chest CT imaging between February and October 2020 in Japan, a non-endemic area. For each chest CT, the CO-RADS scores, determined by consensus among three experienced chest radiologists, were used as the gold standard. Images from 412 patients were used to train the model, whereas images from 83 patients were tested to obtain AI-based CO-RADS scores for each image. Six independent raters (one medical student, two residents, and three board-certified radiologists) evaluated the test images. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and weighted kappa values were calculated to determine the inter-rater agreement with the gold standard. The mean ICC and weighted kappa were 0.754 and 0.752 for the medical student and residents (taken together), 0.851 and 0.850 for the diagnostic radiologists, and 0.913 and 0.912 for AI, respectively. The CO-RADS scores calculated using our AI-based algorithm were comparable to those assigned by radiologists, indicating the accuracy and high reproducibility of our model. Our study findings would enable accurate reading, particularly in areas where radiologists are unavailable, and contribute to improvements in patient management and workflow. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8946998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89469982022-03-25 Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area Ishiwata, Yoshinobu Miura, Kentaro Kishimoto, Mayuko Nomura, Koichiro Sawamura, Shungo Magami, Shigeru Ikawa, Mizuki Yamashiro, Tsuneo Utsunomiya, Daisuke Diagnostics (Basel) Article In this study, we first developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for classifying chest computed tomography (CT) images using the coronavirus disease 2019 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). Subsequently, we evaluated its accuracy by comparing the calculated scores with those assigned by radiologists with varying levels of experience. This study included patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent chest CT imaging between February and October 2020 in Japan, a non-endemic area. For each chest CT, the CO-RADS scores, determined by consensus among three experienced chest radiologists, were used as the gold standard. Images from 412 patients were used to train the model, whereas images from 83 patients were tested to obtain AI-based CO-RADS scores for each image. Six independent raters (one medical student, two residents, and three board-certified radiologists) evaluated the test images. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and weighted kappa values were calculated to determine the inter-rater agreement with the gold standard. The mean ICC and weighted kappa were 0.754 and 0.752 for the medical student and residents (taken together), 0.851 and 0.850 for the diagnostic radiologists, and 0.913 and 0.912 for AI, respectively. The CO-RADS scores calculated using our AI-based algorithm were comparable to those assigned by radiologists, indicating the accuracy and high reproducibility of our model. Our study findings would enable accurate reading, particularly in areas where radiologists are unavailable, and contribute to improvements in patient management and workflow. MDPI 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8946998/ /pubmed/35328290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030738 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ishiwata, Yoshinobu Miura, Kentaro Kishimoto, Mayuko Nomura, Koichiro Sawamura, Shungo Magami, Shigeru Ikawa, Mizuki Yamashiro, Tsuneo Utsunomiya, Daisuke Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area |
title | Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_full | Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_fullStr | Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_short | Comparison of CO-RADS Scores Based on Visual and Artificial Intelligence Assessments in a Non-Endemic Area |
title_sort | comparison of co-rads scores based on visual and artificial intelligence assessments in a non-endemic area |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishiwatayoshinobu comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea AT miurakentaro comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea AT kishimotomayuko comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea AT nomurakoichiro comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea AT sawamurashungo comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea AT magamishigeru comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea AT ikawamizuki comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea AT yamashirotsuneo comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea AT utsunomiyadaisuke comparisonofcoradsscoresbasedonvisualandartificialintelligenceassessmentsinanonendemicarea |