Cargando…
Radiomics in Cross-Sectional Adrenal Imaging: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment Study
In this study, we aimed to systematically review the current literature on radiomics applied to cross-sectional adrenal imaging and assess its methodological quality. Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched to identify original research articles investigating radiomics applications on cross-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030578 |
_version_ | 1784674361645465600 |
---|---|
author | Stanzione, Arnaldo Galatola, Roberta Cuocolo, Renato Romeo, Valeria Verde, Francesco Mainenti, Pier Paolo Brunetti, Arturo Maurea, Simone |
author_facet | Stanzione, Arnaldo Galatola, Roberta Cuocolo, Renato Romeo, Valeria Verde, Francesco Mainenti, Pier Paolo Brunetti, Arturo Maurea, Simone |
author_sort | Stanzione, Arnaldo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we aimed to systematically review the current literature on radiomics applied to cross-sectional adrenal imaging and assess its methodological quality. Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched to identify original research articles investigating radiomics applications on cross-sectional adrenal imaging (search end date February 2021). For qualitative synthesis, details regarding study design, aim, sample size and imaging modality were recorded as well as those regarding the radiomics pipeline (e.g., segmentation and feature extraction strategy). The methodological quality of each study was evaluated using the radiomics quality score (RQS). After duplicate removal and selection criteria application, 25 full-text articles were included and evaluated. All were retrospective studies, mostly based on CT images (17/25, 68%), with manual (19/25, 76%) and two-dimensional segmentation (13/25, 52%) being preferred. Machine learning was paired to radiomics in about half of the studies (12/25, 48%). The median total and percentage RQS scores were 2 (interquartile range, IQR = −5–8) and 6% (IQR = 0–22%), respectively. The highest and lowest scores registered were 12/36 (33%) and −5/36 (0%). The most critical issues were the absence of proper feature selection, the lack of appropriate model validation and poor data openness. The methodological quality of radiomics studies on adrenal cross-sectional imaging is heterogeneous and lower than desirable. Efforts toward building higher quality evidence are essential to facilitate the future translation into clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8947112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89471122022-03-25 Radiomics in Cross-Sectional Adrenal Imaging: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment Study Stanzione, Arnaldo Galatola, Roberta Cuocolo, Renato Romeo, Valeria Verde, Francesco Mainenti, Pier Paolo Brunetti, Arturo Maurea, Simone Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review In this study, we aimed to systematically review the current literature on radiomics applied to cross-sectional adrenal imaging and assess its methodological quality. Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched to identify original research articles investigating radiomics applications on cross-sectional adrenal imaging (search end date February 2021). For qualitative synthesis, details regarding study design, aim, sample size and imaging modality were recorded as well as those regarding the radiomics pipeline (e.g., segmentation and feature extraction strategy). The methodological quality of each study was evaluated using the radiomics quality score (RQS). After duplicate removal and selection criteria application, 25 full-text articles were included and evaluated. All were retrospective studies, mostly based on CT images (17/25, 68%), with manual (19/25, 76%) and two-dimensional segmentation (13/25, 52%) being preferred. Machine learning was paired to radiomics in about half of the studies (12/25, 48%). The median total and percentage RQS scores were 2 (interquartile range, IQR = −5–8) and 6% (IQR = 0–22%), respectively. The highest and lowest scores registered were 12/36 (33%) and −5/36 (0%). The most critical issues were the absence of proper feature selection, the lack of appropriate model validation and poor data openness. The methodological quality of radiomics studies on adrenal cross-sectional imaging is heterogeneous and lower than desirable. Efforts toward building higher quality evidence are essential to facilitate the future translation into clinical practice. MDPI 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8947112/ /pubmed/35328133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030578 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Stanzione, Arnaldo Galatola, Roberta Cuocolo, Renato Romeo, Valeria Verde, Francesco Mainenti, Pier Paolo Brunetti, Arturo Maurea, Simone Radiomics in Cross-Sectional Adrenal Imaging: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment Study |
title | Radiomics in Cross-Sectional Adrenal Imaging: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment Study |
title_full | Radiomics in Cross-Sectional Adrenal Imaging: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment Study |
title_fullStr | Radiomics in Cross-Sectional Adrenal Imaging: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiomics in Cross-Sectional Adrenal Imaging: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment Study |
title_short | Radiomics in Cross-Sectional Adrenal Imaging: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment Study |
title_sort | radiomics in cross-sectional adrenal imaging: a systematic review and quality assessment study |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030578 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stanzionearnaldo radiomicsincrosssectionaladrenalimagingasystematicreviewandqualityassessmentstudy AT galatolaroberta radiomicsincrosssectionaladrenalimagingasystematicreviewandqualityassessmentstudy AT cuocolorenato radiomicsincrosssectionaladrenalimagingasystematicreviewandqualityassessmentstudy AT romeovaleria radiomicsincrosssectionaladrenalimagingasystematicreviewandqualityassessmentstudy AT verdefrancesco radiomicsincrosssectionaladrenalimagingasystematicreviewandqualityassessmentstudy AT mainentipierpaolo radiomicsincrosssectionaladrenalimagingasystematicreviewandqualityassessmentstudy AT brunettiarturo radiomicsincrosssectionaladrenalimagingasystematicreviewandqualityassessmentstudy AT maureasimone radiomicsincrosssectionaladrenalimagingasystematicreviewandqualityassessmentstudy |