Cargando…
The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review
(1) Background: Up to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer either have synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) or develop CRLM over the course of their disease. Surgery and thermal ablation are the most common local treatment options of choice. Despite development and improvement in local t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030715 |
_version_ | 1784674381051461632 |
---|---|
author | Bijlstra, Okker D. Boreel, Maud M. E. van Mossel, Sietse Burgmans, Mark C. Kapiteijn, Ellen H. W. Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Rietbergen, Daphne D. D. van Velden, Floris H. P. Vahrmeijer, Alexander L. Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan Mieog, J. Sven D. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee |
author_facet | Bijlstra, Okker D. Boreel, Maud M. E. van Mossel, Sietse Burgmans, Mark C. Kapiteijn, Ellen H. W. Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Rietbergen, Daphne D. D. van Velden, Floris H. P. Vahrmeijer, Alexander L. Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan Mieog, J. Sven D. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee |
author_sort | Bijlstra, Okker D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Up to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer either have synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) or develop CRLM over the course of their disease. Surgery and thermal ablation are the most common local treatment options of choice. Despite development and improvement in local treatment options, (local) recurrence remains a significant clinical problem. Many different imaging modalities can be used in the follow-up after treatment of CRLM, lacking evidence-based international consensus on the modality of choice. In this systematic review, we evaluated (18)F-FDG-PET-CT performance after surgical resection, thermal ablation, radioembolization, and neoadjuvant and palliative chemotherapy based on current published literature. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on the PubMed database. (3) Results: A total of 31 original articles were included in the analysis. Only one suitable study was found describing the role of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT after surgery, which makes it hard to draw a firm conclusion. (18)F-FDG-PET-CT showed to be of additional value in the follow-up after thermal ablation, palliative chemotherapy, and radioembolization. (18)F-FDG-PET-CT was found to be a poor to moderate predictor of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (4) Conclusions: (18)F-FDG-PET-CT is superior to conventional morphological imaging modalities in the early detection of residual disease after thermal ablation and in the treatment evaluation and prediction of prognosis during palliative chemotherapy and after radioembolization, and (18)F-FDG-PET-CT could be considered in selected cases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8947194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89471942022-03-25 The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review Bijlstra, Okker D. Boreel, Maud M. E. van Mossel, Sietse Burgmans, Mark C. Kapiteijn, Ellen H. W. Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Rietbergen, Daphne D. D. van Velden, Floris H. P. Vahrmeijer, Alexander L. Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan Mieog, J. Sven D. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review (1) Background: Up to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer either have synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) or develop CRLM over the course of their disease. Surgery and thermal ablation are the most common local treatment options of choice. Despite development and improvement in local treatment options, (local) recurrence remains a significant clinical problem. Many different imaging modalities can be used in the follow-up after treatment of CRLM, lacking evidence-based international consensus on the modality of choice. In this systematic review, we evaluated (18)F-FDG-PET-CT performance after surgical resection, thermal ablation, radioembolization, and neoadjuvant and palliative chemotherapy based on current published literature. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on the PubMed database. (3) Results: A total of 31 original articles were included in the analysis. Only one suitable study was found describing the role of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT after surgery, which makes it hard to draw a firm conclusion. (18)F-FDG-PET-CT showed to be of additional value in the follow-up after thermal ablation, palliative chemotherapy, and radioembolization. (18)F-FDG-PET-CT was found to be a poor to moderate predictor of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (4) Conclusions: (18)F-FDG-PET-CT is superior to conventional morphological imaging modalities in the early detection of residual disease after thermal ablation and in the treatment evaluation and prediction of prognosis during palliative chemotherapy and after radioembolization, and (18)F-FDG-PET-CT could be considered in selected cases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. MDPI 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8947194/ /pubmed/35328267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030715 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Bijlstra, Okker D. Boreel, Maud M. E. van Mossel, Sietse Burgmans, Mark C. Kapiteijn, Ellen H. W. Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Rietbergen, Daphne D. D. van Velden, Floris H. P. Vahrmeijer, Alexander L. Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan Mieog, J. Sven D. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review |
title | The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | value of (18)f-fdg-pet-ct imaging in treatment evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bijlstraokkerd thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT boreelmaudme thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT vanmosselsietse thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT burgmansmarkc thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT kapiteijnellenhw thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT oprealagerdanielae thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT rietbergendaphnedd thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT vanveldenflorishp thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT vahrmeijeralexanderl thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT swijnenburgrutgerjan thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT mieogjsvend thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT degeusoeilioefee thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT bijlstraokkerd valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT boreelmaudme valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT vanmosselsietse valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT burgmansmarkc valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT kapiteijnellenhw valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT oprealagerdanielae valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT rietbergendaphnedd valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT vanveldenflorishp valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT vahrmeijeralexanderl valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT swijnenburgrutgerjan valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT mieogjsvend valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview AT degeusoeilioefee valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview |