Cargando…

The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Up to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer either have synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) or develop CRLM over the course of their disease. Surgery and thermal ablation are the most common local treatment options of choice. Despite development and improvement in local t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bijlstra, Okker D., Boreel, Maud M. E., van Mossel, Sietse, Burgmans, Mark C., Kapiteijn, Ellen H. W., Oprea-Lager, Daniela E., Rietbergen, Daphne D. D., van Velden, Floris H. P., Vahrmeijer, Alexander L., Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan, Mieog, J. Sven D., de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030715
_version_ 1784674381051461632
author Bijlstra, Okker D.
Boreel, Maud M. E.
van Mossel, Sietse
Burgmans, Mark C.
Kapiteijn, Ellen H. W.
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Rietbergen, Daphne D. D.
van Velden, Floris H. P.
Vahrmeijer, Alexander L.
Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan
Mieog, J. Sven D.
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
author_facet Bijlstra, Okker D.
Boreel, Maud M. E.
van Mossel, Sietse
Burgmans, Mark C.
Kapiteijn, Ellen H. W.
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Rietbergen, Daphne D. D.
van Velden, Floris H. P.
Vahrmeijer, Alexander L.
Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan
Mieog, J. Sven D.
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
author_sort Bijlstra, Okker D.
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Up to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer either have synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) or develop CRLM over the course of their disease. Surgery and thermal ablation are the most common local treatment options of choice. Despite development and improvement in local treatment options, (local) recurrence remains a significant clinical problem. Many different imaging modalities can be used in the follow-up after treatment of CRLM, lacking evidence-based international consensus on the modality of choice. In this systematic review, we evaluated (18)F-FDG-PET-CT performance after surgical resection, thermal ablation, radioembolization, and neoadjuvant and palliative chemotherapy based on current published literature. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on the PubMed database. (3) Results: A total of 31 original articles were included in the analysis. Only one suitable study was found describing the role of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT after surgery, which makes it hard to draw a firm conclusion. (18)F-FDG-PET-CT showed to be of additional value in the follow-up after thermal ablation, palliative chemotherapy, and radioembolization. (18)F-FDG-PET-CT was found to be a poor to moderate predictor of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (4) Conclusions: (18)F-FDG-PET-CT is superior to conventional morphological imaging modalities in the early detection of residual disease after thermal ablation and in the treatment evaluation and prediction of prognosis during palliative chemotherapy and after radioembolization, and (18)F-FDG-PET-CT could be considered in selected cases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8947194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89471942022-03-25 The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review Bijlstra, Okker D. Boreel, Maud M. E. van Mossel, Sietse Burgmans, Mark C. Kapiteijn, Ellen H. W. Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Rietbergen, Daphne D. D. van Velden, Floris H. P. Vahrmeijer, Alexander L. Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan Mieog, J. Sven D. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review (1) Background: Up to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer either have synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) or develop CRLM over the course of their disease. Surgery and thermal ablation are the most common local treatment options of choice. Despite development and improvement in local treatment options, (local) recurrence remains a significant clinical problem. Many different imaging modalities can be used in the follow-up after treatment of CRLM, lacking evidence-based international consensus on the modality of choice. In this systematic review, we evaluated (18)F-FDG-PET-CT performance after surgical resection, thermal ablation, radioembolization, and neoadjuvant and palliative chemotherapy based on current published literature. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on the PubMed database. (3) Results: A total of 31 original articles were included in the analysis. Only one suitable study was found describing the role of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT after surgery, which makes it hard to draw a firm conclusion. (18)F-FDG-PET-CT showed to be of additional value in the follow-up after thermal ablation, palliative chemotherapy, and radioembolization. (18)F-FDG-PET-CT was found to be a poor to moderate predictor of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (4) Conclusions: (18)F-FDG-PET-CT is superior to conventional morphological imaging modalities in the early detection of residual disease after thermal ablation and in the treatment evaluation and prediction of prognosis during palliative chemotherapy and after radioembolization, and (18)F-FDG-PET-CT could be considered in selected cases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. MDPI 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8947194/ /pubmed/35328267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030715 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Bijlstra, Okker D.
Boreel, Maud M. E.
van Mossel, Sietse
Burgmans, Mark C.
Kapiteijn, Ellen H. W.
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Rietbergen, Daphne D. D.
van Velden, Floris H. P.
Vahrmeijer, Alexander L.
Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan
Mieog, J. Sven D.
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review
title The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review
title_full The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review
title_short The Value of (18)F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review
title_sort value of (18)f-fdg-pet-ct imaging in treatment evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030715
work_keys_str_mv AT bijlstraokkerd thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT boreelmaudme thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT vanmosselsietse thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT burgmansmarkc thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT kapiteijnellenhw thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT oprealagerdanielae thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT rietbergendaphnedd thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT vanveldenflorishp thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT vahrmeijeralexanderl thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT swijnenburgrutgerjan thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT mieogjsvend thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT degeusoeilioefee thevalueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT bijlstraokkerd valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT boreelmaudme valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT vanmosselsietse valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT burgmansmarkc valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT kapiteijnellenhw valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT oprealagerdanielae valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT rietbergendaphnedd valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT vanveldenflorishp valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT vahrmeijeralexanderl valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT swijnenburgrutgerjan valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT mieogjsvend valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview
AT degeusoeilioefee valueof18ffdgpetctimagingintreatmentevaluationofcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreview