Cargando…

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update

In recent, large case series of fungal endophthalmitis (FE) that were published by Asian authors, the most frequent etiologic agents for all types of FE are molds (usually Aspergillus species, while Fusarium is the prevalent etiology in keratitis-related FE). Candida was the organism found in most c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danielescu, Ciprian, Stanca, Horia Tudor, Iorga, Raluca-Eugenia, Darabus, Diana-Maria, Potop, Vasile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328231
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030679
_version_ 1784674391578116096
author Danielescu, Ciprian
Stanca, Horia Tudor
Iorga, Raluca-Eugenia
Darabus, Diana-Maria
Potop, Vasile
author_facet Danielescu, Ciprian
Stanca, Horia Tudor
Iorga, Raluca-Eugenia
Darabus, Diana-Maria
Potop, Vasile
author_sort Danielescu, Ciprian
collection PubMed
description In recent, large case series of fungal endophthalmitis (FE) that were published by Asian authors, the most frequent etiologic agents for all types of FE are molds (usually Aspergillus species, while Fusarium is the prevalent etiology in keratitis-related FE). Candida was the organism found in most cases of endogenous FE. However, we must keep in mind that prevalence of fungal species varies with the geographical area. Lately, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was increasingly used for the diagnosis of FE, allowing for very high diagnostic sensitivity, while the costs become more affordable with time. The most important shortcoming of PCR—the limited number of pathogens that can be simultaneously searched for—may be overcome by newer techniques, such as next-generation sequencing. There are even hopes of searching for genetic sequences that codify resistance to antifungals. We must not forget the potential of simpler tests (such as galactomannan and β-d-glucan) in orienting towards a diagnosis of FE. There are few reports about the use of newer antifungals in FE. Echinocandins have low penetration in the vitreous cavity, and may be of use in cases of fungal chorioretinitis (without vitritis), or injected intravitreally as an off-label, salvage therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8947249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89472492022-03-25 The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update Danielescu, Ciprian Stanca, Horia Tudor Iorga, Raluca-Eugenia Darabus, Diana-Maria Potop, Vasile Diagnostics (Basel) Review In recent, large case series of fungal endophthalmitis (FE) that were published by Asian authors, the most frequent etiologic agents for all types of FE are molds (usually Aspergillus species, while Fusarium is the prevalent etiology in keratitis-related FE). Candida was the organism found in most cases of endogenous FE. However, we must keep in mind that prevalence of fungal species varies with the geographical area. Lately, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was increasingly used for the diagnosis of FE, allowing for very high diagnostic sensitivity, while the costs become more affordable with time. The most important shortcoming of PCR—the limited number of pathogens that can be simultaneously searched for—may be overcome by newer techniques, such as next-generation sequencing. There are even hopes of searching for genetic sequences that codify resistance to antifungals. We must not forget the potential of simpler tests (such as galactomannan and β-d-glucan) in orienting towards a diagnosis of FE. There are few reports about the use of newer antifungals in FE. Echinocandins have low penetration in the vitreous cavity, and may be of use in cases of fungal chorioretinitis (without vitritis), or injected intravitreally as an off-label, salvage therapy. MDPI 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8947249/ /pubmed/35328231 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030679 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Danielescu, Ciprian
Stanca, Horia Tudor
Iorga, Raluca-Eugenia
Darabus, Diana-Maria
Potop, Vasile
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update
title The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update
title_full The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update
title_fullStr The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update
title_full_unstemmed The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update
title_short The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update
title_sort diagnosis and treatment of fungal endophthalmitis: an update
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328231
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030679
work_keys_str_mv AT danielescuciprian thediagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate
AT stancahoriatudor thediagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate
AT iorgaralucaeugenia thediagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate
AT darabusdianamaria thediagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate
AT potopvasile thediagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate
AT danielescuciprian diagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate
AT stancahoriatudor diagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate
AT iorgaralucaeugenia diagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate
AT darabusdianamaria diagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate
AT potopvasile diagnosisandtreatmentoffungalendophthalmitisanupdate