Cargando…

Gene Expression Analysis of Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma: New Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers

Biphasic is the second most common histotype of pleural mesothelioma (PM). It shares epithelioid and sarcomatoid features and is challenging to diagnose. The aim of this study was to identify biphasic PM markers to improve subtyping and prognosis definition. The expression levels of 117 cancer genes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruno, Rossella, Poma, Anello Marcello, Alì, Greta, Distefano, Claudia, Proietti, Agnese, Chella, Antonio, Lucchi, Marco, Melfi, Franca, Franco, Renato, Fontanini, Gabriella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328227
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030674
_version_ 1784674453782790144
author Bruno, Rossella
Poma, Anello Marcello
Alì, Greta
Distefano, Claudia
Proietti, Agnese
Chella, Antonio
Lucchi, Marco
Melfi, Franca
Franco, Renato
Fontanini, Gabriella
author_facet Bruno, Rossella
Poma, Anello Marcello
Alì, Greta
Distefano, Claudia
Proietti, Agnese
Chella, Antonio
Lucchi, Marco
Melfi, Franca
Franco, Renato
Fontanini, Gabriella
author_sort Bruno, Rossella
collection PubMed
description Biphasic is the second most common histotype of pleural mesothelioma (PM). It shares epithelioid and sarcomatoid features and is challenging to diagnose. The aim of this study was to identify biphasic PM markers to improve subtyping and prognosis definition. The expression levels of 117 cancer genes, evaluated using the nanoString system, were compared between the three major histotypes (epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic), and expression differences within biphasic PM were evaluated in relation to the percentage of epithelioid components. Biphasic PM overexpressed CTNNA1 and TIMP3 in comparison to sarcomatoid, and COL16A1 and SDC1 in comparison to epithelioid PM. CFB, MSLN, CLDN15, SERPINE1, and PAK4 were deregulated among all histotypes, leading to the hypothesis of a gradual expression from epithelioid to sarcomatoid PM. According to gene expression, biphasic PM samples were divided in two clusters with a significant difference in the epithelioid component. ADCY4, COL1A1, and COL4A2 were overexpressed in the biphasic group with a low percentage of epithelioid component. Survival analysis using TCGA data showed that high COL1A1 and COL4A2 expression levels correlate with poor survival in PM patients. Herein, we identified markers with the potential to improve diagnosis and prognostic stratification of biphasic PM, which is still an orphan tumor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8947498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89474982022-03-25 Gene Expression Analysis of Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma: New Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers Bruno, Rossella Poma, Anello Marcello Alì, Greta Distefano, Claudia Proietti, Agnese Chella, Antonio Lucchi, Marco Melfi, Franca Franco, Renato Fontanini, Gabriella Diagnostics (Basel) Article Biphasic is the second most common histotype of pleural mesothelioma (PM). It shares epithelioid and sarcomatoid features and is challenging to diagnose. The aim of this study was to identify biphasic PM markers to improve subtyping and prognosis definition. The expression levels of 117 cancer genes, evaluated using the nanoString system, were compared between the three major histotypes (epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic), and expression differences within biphasic PM were evaluated in relation to the percentage of epithelioid components. Biphasic PM overexpressed CTNNA1 and TIMP3 in comparison to sarcomatoid, and COL16A1 and SDC1 in comparison to epithelioid PM. CFB, MSLN, CLDN15, SERPINE1, and PAK4 were deregulated among all histotypes, leading to the hypothesis of a gradual expression from epithelioid to sarcomatoid PM. According to gene expression, biphasic PM samples were divided in two clusters with a significant difference in the epithelioid component. ADCY4, COL1A1, and COL4A2 were overexpressed in the biphasic group with a low percentage of epithelioid component. Survival analysis using TCGA data showed that high COL1A1 and COL4A2 expression levels correlate with poor survival in PM patients. Herein, we identified markers with the potential to improve diagnosis and prognostic stratification of biphasic PM, which is still an orphan tumor. MDPI 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8947498/ /pubmed/35328227 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030674 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bruno, Rossella
Poma, Anello Marcello
Alì, Greta
Distefano, Claudia
Proietti, Agnese
Chella, Antonio
Lucchi, Marco
Melfi, Franca
Franco, Renato
Fontanini, Gabriella
Gene Expression Analysis of Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma: New Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers
title Gene Expression Analysis of Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma: New Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers
title_full Gene Expression Analysis of Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma: New Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers
title_fullStr Gene Expression Analysis of Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma: New Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers
title_full_unstemmed Gene Expression Analysis of Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma: New Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers
title_short Gene Expression Analysis of Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma: New Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers
title_sort gene expression analysis of biphasic pleural mesothelioma: new potential diagnostic and prognostic markers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328227
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030674
work_keys_str_mv AT brunorossella geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers
AT pomaanellomarcello geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers
AT aligreta geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers
AT distefanoclaudia geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers
AT proiettiagnese geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers
AT chellaantonio geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers
AT lucchimarco geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers
AT melfifranca geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers
AT francorenato geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers
AT fontaninigabriella geneexpressionanalysisofbiphasicpleuralmesotheliomanewpotentialdiagnosticandprognosticmarkers