Cargando…

A New CT Analysis of Abdominal Wall after DIEP Flap Harvesting

The abdominal microsurgical flap based on the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become the most popular option worldwide for autologous breast reconstruction. Several authors have investigated the results of reconstructed breasts, but the literature lacks systematic reviews...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brambullo, Tito, Kohlscheen, Eva, Faccio, Diego, Messana, Francesco, Vezzaro, Roberto, Pranovi, Giulia, Masiero, Stefano, Zampieri, Sandra, Ravara, Barbara, Bassetto, Franco, Vindigni, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030683
_version_ 1784674494829297664
author Brambullo, Tito
Kohlscheen, Eva
Faccio, Diego
Messana, Francesco
Vezzaro, Roberto
Pranovi, Giulia
Masiero, Stefano
Zampieri, Sandra
Ravara, Barbara
Bassetto, Franco
Vindigni, Vincenzo
author_facet Brambullo, Tito
Kohlscheen, Eva
Faccio, Diego
Messana, Francesco
Vezzaro, Roberto
Pranovi, Giulia
Masiero, Stefano
Zampieri, Sandra
Ravara, Barbara
Bassetto, Franco
Vindigni, Vincenzo
author_sort Brambullo, Tito
collection PubMed
description The abdominal microsurgical flap based on the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become the most popular option worldwide for autologous breast reconstruction. Several authors have investigated the results of reconstructed breasts, but the literature lacks systematic reviews exploring the donor site of the abdominal wall. To fulfil our aims, a new diagnostic muscle imaging analysis was designed and implemented. This study focused on rectus abdominal muscle morphology and function in a single series of 12 consecutive patients analysed before and after breast reconstruction with a microsurgical DIEP flap. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, “ipsilateral reconstruction” and “contralateral reconstruction”, depending on the side of the flap harvest and breast reconstruction, then evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scans scheduled for tumor staging, and clinically examined by a physiatrist. Numerous alterations in muscle physiology were observed due to surgical dissection of perforator vessels, and rectus muscle distress without functional impairment was a common result. Postoperatively, patients undergoing “contralateral reconstruction” appeared to exhibit fewer rectus muscle alterations. Overall, only three patients were impacted by a long-term deterioration in their quality of life. On the basis of the newly developed and implemented diagnostic approach, we concluded that DIEP microsurgical breast reconstruction is a safe procedure without major complications at the donor site, even if long-term alterations of the rectus muscle are a common finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8947670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89476702022-03-25 A New CT Analysis of Abdominal Wall after DIEP Flap Harvesting Brambullo, Tito Kohlscheen, Eva Faccio, Diego Messana, Francesco Vezzaro, Roberto Pranovi, Giulia Masiero, Stefano Zampieri, Sandra Ravara, Barbara Bassetto, Franco Vindigni, Vincenzo Diagnostics (Basel) Article The abdominal microsurgical flap based on the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become the most popular option worldwide for autologous breast reconstruction. Several authors have investigated the results of reconstructed breasts, but the literature lacks systematic reviews exploring the donor site of the abdominal wall. To fulfil our aims, a new diagnostic muscle imaging analysis was designed and implemented. This study focused on rectus abdominal muscle morphology and function in a single series of 12 consecutive patients analysed before and after breast reconstruction with a microsurgical DIEP flap. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, “ipsilateral reconstruction” and “contralateral reconstruction”, depending on the side of the flap harvest and breast reconstruction, then evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scans scheduled for tumor staging, and clinically examined by a physiatrist. Numerous alterations in muscle physiology were observed due to surgical dissection of perforator vessels, and rectus muscle distress without functional impairment was a common result. Postoperatively, patients undergoing “contralateral reconstruction” appeared to exhibit fewer rectus muscle alterations. Overall, only three patients were impacted by a long-term deterioration in their quality of life. On the basis of the newly developed and implemented diagnostic approach, we concluded that DIEP microsurgical breast reconstruction is a safe procedure without major complications at the donor site, even if long-term alterations of the rectus muscle are a common finding. MDPI 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8947670/ /pubmed/35328236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030683 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brambullo, Tito
Kohlscheen, Eva
Faccio, Diego
Messana, Francesco
Vezzaro, Roberto
Pranovi, Giulia
Masiero, Stefano
Zampieri, Sandra
Ravara, Barbara
Bassetto, Franco
Vindigni, Vincenzo
A New CT Analysis of Abdominal Wall after DIEP Flap Harvesting
title A New CT Analysis of Abdominal Wall after DIEP Flap Harvesting
title_full A New CT Analysis of Abdominal Wall after DIEP Flap Harvesting
title_fullStr A New CT Analysis of Abdominal Wall after DIEP Flap Harvesting
title_full_unstemmed A New CT Analysis of Abdominal Wall after DIEP Flap Harvesting
title_short A New CT Analysis of Abdominal Wall after DIEP Flap Harvesting
title_sort new ct analysis of abdominal wall after diep flap harvesting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030683
work_keys_str_mv AT brambullotito anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT kohlscheeneva anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT facciodiego anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT messanafrancesco anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT vezzaroroberto anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT pranovigiulia anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT masierostefano anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT zampierisandra anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT ravarabarbara anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT bassettofranco anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT vindignivincenzo anewctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT brambullotito newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT kohlscheeneva newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT facciodiego newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT messanafrancesco newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT vezzaroroberto newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT pranovigiulia newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT masierostefano newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT zampierisandra newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT ravarabarbara newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT bassettofranco newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting
AT vindignivincenzo newctanalysisofabdominalwallafterdiepflapharvesting