Cargando…

Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon

BACKGROUND: Decision aids (DAs) are utilized to ensure that patients are informed and involved in the decision-making process. Although DAs improve decision quality, other aspects of the decision-making process, such as trust and regret, are seldom measured. The objective of the present study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brodney, Suzanne, Sepucha, Karen, Chang, Yuchiao, Moulton, Ben, Barry, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350122
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00149
_version_ 1784674496974684160
author Brodney, Suzanne
Sepucha, Karen
Chang, Yuchiao
Moulton, Ben
Barry, Michael J.
author_facet Brodney, Suzanne
Sepucha, Karen
Chang, Yuchiao
Moulton, Ben
Barry, Michael J.
author_sort Brodney, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decision aids (DAs) are utilized to ensure that patients are informed and involved in the decision-making process. Although DAs improve decision quality, other aspects of the decision-making process, such as trust and regret, are seldom measured. The objective of the present study was to determine whether patients given a DA prior to orthopaedic surgery had greater trust and lower regret at 6 months postoperatively. METHODS: Consecutive patients were identified who underwent a hip or knee replacement or spine surgery from October 2018 to January 2020 and were subsequently surveyed at 6 months postoperatively. Outcomes included the Trust in the Surgical Decision and Decision Regret Scales. The primary analysis compared scores of patients who reviewed at least some of the DA to those who had not received or reviewed it. A sensitivity analysis compared patients with a DA order who reported reviewing it to those who did not. Multivariable models analyzed whether DA exposure predicted trust or regret. An exploratory mediation analysis examined the direct and indirect effects of DA exposure, including through the Shared Decision Making Process score. RESULTS: The response rate was 56% (700 of 1,253). In the primary analysis, the proportion of patients who reported complete trust was 50.9% among those with no DA review and 63.8% among those with DA review (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 2.36). A nonsignificant effect was observed comparing a DA order (59.9%) versus no DA order (51.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 2.11). Regret was unrelated to DA exposure. In the mediation analysis, 19.3% (95% confidence interval, 3.1% to 35.4%) of the effect of DA review on trust could be attributed to increased shared decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who reviewed a DA prior to orthopaedic surgery reported higher trust in their surgeons. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Providing patients with a DA prior to orthopaedic surgery can improve trust in the surgeon. Improving trust between patients and surgeons may improve communication and help patients make better health decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8947679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89476792022-03-28 Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon Brodney, Suzanne Sepucha, Karen Chang, Yuchiao Moulton, Ben Barry, Michael J. JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles BACKGROUND: Decision aids (DAs) are utilized to ensure that patients are informed and involved in the decision-making process. Although DAs improve decision quality, other aspects of the decision-making process, such as trust and regret, are seldom measured. The objective of the present study was to determine whether patients given a DA prior to orthopaedic surgery had greater trust and lower regret at 6 months postoperatively. METHODS: Consecutive patients were identified who underwent a hip or knee replacement or spine surgery from October 2018 to January 2020 and were subsequently surveyed at 6 months postoperatively. Outcomes included the Trust in the Surgical Decision and Decision Regret Scales. The primary analysis compared scores of patients who reviewed at least some of the DA to those who had not received or reviewed it. A sensitivity analysis compared patients with a DA order who reported reviewing it to those who did not. Multivariable models analyzed whether DA exposure predicted trust or regret. An exploratory mediation analysis examined the direct and indirect effects of DA exposure, including through the Shared Decision Making Process score. RESULTS: The response rate was 56% (700 of 1,253). In the primary analysis, the proportion of patients who reported complete trust was 50.9% among those with no DA review and 63.8% among those with DA review (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 2.36). A nonsignificant effect was observed comparing a DA order (59.9%) versus no DA order (51.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 2.11). Regret was unrelated to DA exposure. In the mediation analysis, 19.3% (95% confidence interval, 3.1% to 35.4%) of the effect of DA review on trust could be attributed to increased shared decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who reviewed a DA prior to orthopaedic surgery reported higher trust in their surgeons. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Providing patients with a DA prior to orthopaedic surgery can improve trust in the surgeon. Improving trust between patients and surgeons may improve communication and help patients make better health decisions. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8947679/ /pubmed/35350122 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00149 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Brodney, Suzanne
Sepucha, Karen
Chang, Yuchiao
Moulton, Ben
Barry, Michael J.
Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon
title Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon
title_full Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon
title_fullStr Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon
title_full_unstemmed Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon
title_short Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon
title_sort patients who reviewed a decision aid prior to major orthopaedic surgery reported higher trust in their surgeon
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350122
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00149
work_keys_str_mv AT brodneysuzanne patientswhoreviewedadecisionaidpriortomajororthopaedicsurgeryreportedhighertrustintheirsurgeon
AT sepuchakaren patientswhoreviewedadecisionaidpriortomajororthopaedicsurgeryreportedhighertrustintheirsurgeon
AT changyuchiao patientswhoreviewedadecisionaidpriortomajororthopaedicsurgeryreportedhighertrustintheirsurgeon
AT moultonben patientswhoreviewedadecisionaidpriortomajororthopaedicsurgeryreportedhighertrustintheirsurgeon
AT barrymichaelj patientswhoreviewedadecisionaidpriortomajororthopaedicsurgeryreportedhighertrustintheirsurgeon