Cargando…
Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review
A conservative approach for restoring deep proximal lesions is to apply an increment of composite resin over the preexisting cervical margin to relocate it coronally, the so-called “deep margin elevation” (DME). A literature search for research articles referring to DME published from January 1998 u...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35323250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10030048 |
_version_ | 1784674510120681472 |
---|---|
author | Samartzi, Theodora Kalliopi Papalexopoulos, Dimokritos Ntovas, Panagiotis Rahiotis, Christos Blatz, Markus B. |
author_facet | Samartzi, Theodora Kalliopi Papalexopoulos, Dimokritos Ntovas, Panagiotis Rahiotis, Christos Blatz, Markus B. |
author_sort | Samartzi, Theodora Kalliopi |
collection | PubMed |
description | A conservative approach for restoring deep proximal lesions is to apply an increment of composite resin over the preexisting cervical margin to relocate it coronally, the so-called “deep margin elevation” (DME). A literature search for research articles referring to DME published from January 1998 until November 2021 was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), Ovid, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Semantic Scholar databases applying preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. Elevation material and adhesive system employed for luting seem to be significant factors concerning the marginal adaptation of the restoration. This technique does not affect bond strength, fatigue behavior, fracture resistance, failure pattern or repairability. DME and subgingival restorations are compatible with periodontal health, given that they are well-polished and refined. The available literature is limited mainly to in vitro studies. Therefore, randomized clinical trials with extended follow-up periods are necessary to clarify all aspects of the technique and ascertain its validity in clinical practice. For the time being, DME should be applied with caution respecting three criteria: capability of field isolation, the perfect seal of the cervical margin provided by the matrix, and no invasion of the connective compartment of biological width. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8947734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89477342022-03-25 Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review Samartzi, Theodora Kalliopi Papalexopoulos, Dimokritos Ntovas, Panagiotis Rahiotis, Christos Blatz, Markus B. Dent J (Basel) Review A conservative approach for restoring deep proximal lesions is to apply an increment of composite resin over the preexisting cervical margin to relocate it coronally, the so-called “deep margin elevation” (DME). A literature search for research articles referring to DME published from January 1998 until November 2021 was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), Ovid, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Semantic Scholar databases applying preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. Elevation material and adhesive system employed for luting seem to be significant factors concerning the marginal adaptation of the restoration. This technique does not affect bond strength, fatigue behavior, fracture resistance, failure pattern or repairability. DME and subgingival restorations are compatible with periodontal health, given that they are well-polished and refined. The available literature is limited mainly to in vitro studies. Therefore, randomized clinical trials with extended follow-up periods are necessary to clarify all aspects of the technique and ascertain its validity in clinical practice. For the time being, DME should be applied with caution respecting three criteria: capability of field isolation, the perfect seal of the cervical margin provided by the matrix, and no invasion of the connective compartment of biological width. MDPI 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8947734/ /pubmed/35323250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10030048 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Samartzi, Theodora Kalliopi Papalexopoulos, Dimokritos Ntovas, Panagiotis Rahiotis, Christos Blatz, Markus B. Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review |
title | Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review |
title_full | Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review |
title_short | Deep Margin Elevation: A Literature Review |
title_sort | deep margin elevation: a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35323250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10030048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samartzitheodorakalliopi deepmarginelevationaliteraturereview AT papalexopoulosdimokritos deepmarginelevationaliteraturereview AT ntovaspanagiotis deepmarginelevationaliteraturereview AT rahiotischristos deepmarginelevationaliteraturereview AT blatzmarkusb deepmarginelevationaliteraturereview |