Cargando…

Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the radiation dose received by patients during hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedures and the related influencing factors. METHODS: Data of 162 cases in the HAIC group and 230 cases in the TACE group were collected. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Hui, Lu, Hailei, Zeng, Jiahuan, Zhang, Yan, Shen, Lujun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2021.08.004
_version_ 1784674566583353344
author Yuan, Hui
Lu, Hailei
Zeng, Jiahuan
Zhang, Yan
Shen, Lujun
author_facet Yuan, Hui
Lu, Hailei
Zeng, Jiahuan
Zhang, Yan
Shen, Lujun
author_sort Yuan, Hui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the radiation dose received by patients during hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedures and the related influencing factors. METHODS: Data of 162 cases in the HAIC group and 230 cases in the TACE group were collected. The included covariates were Age (<45/45–59/≥60 years), BMI levels (underweight/normal weight/obesity), focus Dye of tumor (present/absent), lesion size (<5cm/≥5cm), superselection (present/absent), hepatic vascular variation (present/absent). The endpoints were postoperative dose-area product (DAP), exposure time and Air kerma (AK). RESULTS: Of all included patients, the HAIC group patients were younger than those in the TACE group (P ​= ​0.028). The proportion of patients with large lesions in the HAIC group was higher than the TACE group (45.7% vs. 33.9%, P ​= ​0.019). The proportion of patients who had superselection was lower in the HAIC group as compared to the TACE group (61.7% vs. 82.2%, P ​< ​0.001). Generally, the HAIC group has lower DAP, exposure time and AK by 36.3% (P ​< ​0.001), 38.2% (P ​< ​0.001), and 41.3% (P ​< ​0.001) than the TACE group, respectively. Linear regression analysis showed the procedure method (HAIC/TACE, P ​< ​0.001), type of DSA machine (Pheno/FD20, P ​< ​0.001), BMI levels (P ​< ​0.001), age (P ​= ​0.021), lesion size (<5cm/≥5 ​cm, P ​= ​0.031) significantly correlated with low DAP. In the HAIC group, the type of DSA machine and BMI correlated with the radiation dose, while in the TACE group, the type of DSA machine, BMI, and lesion size correlated with the radiation dose. CONCLUSION: Compared with TACE, HAIC enables doctors and patients to receive lower radiation doses. Obese patients in both HAIC and TACE groups increase the radiation exposure in interventional doctors and patients, but large lesions only affect the radiation dose in the TACE procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8947989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89479892022-05-17 Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer Yuan, Hui Lu, Hailei Zeng, Jiahuan Zhang, Yan Shen, Lujun J Interv Med Clinical Study OBJECTIVE: To analyze the radiation dose received by patients during hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedures and the related influencing factors. METHODS: Data of 162 cases in the HAIC group and 230 cases in the TACE group were collected. The included covariates were Age (<45/45–59/≥60 years), BMI levels (underweight/normal weight/obesity), focus Dye of tumor (present/absent), lesion size (<5cm/≥5cm), superselection (present/absent), hepatic vascular variation (present/absent). The endpoints were postoperative dose-area product (DAP), exposure time and Air kerma (AK). RESULTS: Of all included patients, the HAIC group patients were younger than those in the TACE group (P ​= ​0.028). The proportion of patients with large lesions in the HAIC group was higher than the TACE group (45.7% vs. 33.9%, P ​= ​0.019). The proportion of patients who had superselection was lower in the HAIC group as compared to the TACE group (61.7% vs. 82.2%, P ​< ​0.001). Generally, the HAIC group has lower DAP, exposure time and AK by 36.3% (P ​< ​0.001), 38.2% (P ​< ​0.001), and 41.3% (P ​< ​0.001) than the TACE group, respectively. Linear regression analysis showed the procedure method (HAIC/TACE, P ​< ​0.001), type of DSA machine (Pheno/FD20, P ​< ​0.001), BMI levels (P ​< ​0.001), age (P ​= ​0.021), lesion size (<5cm/≥5 ​cm, P ​= ​0.031) significantly correlated with low DAP. In the HAIC group, the type of DSA machine and BMI correlated with the radiation dose, while in the TACE group, the type of DSA machine, BMI, and lesion size correlated with the radiation dose. CONCLUSION: Compared with TACE, HAIC enables doctors and patients to receive lower radiation doses. Obese patients in both HAIC and TACE groups increase the radiation exposure in interventional doctors and patients, but large lesions only affect the radiation dose in the TACE procedure. Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8947989/ /pubmed/35586376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2021.08.004 Text en © 2021 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Radiology Press. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Yuan, Hui
Lu, Hailei
Zeng, Jiahuan
Zhang, Yan
Shen, Lujun
Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer
title Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer
title_full Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer
title_short Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer
title_sort comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2021.08.004
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanhui comparisonofradiationdosesbetweenhepaticarteryinfusionchemotherapyandtransarterialchemoembolizationforlivercancer
AT luhailei comparisonofradiationdosesbetweenhepaticarteryinfusionchemotherapyandtransarterialchemoembolizationforlivercancer
AT zengjiahuan comparisonofradiationdosesbetweenhepaticarteryinfusionchemotherapyandtransarterialchemoembolizationforlivercancer
AT zhangyan comparisonofradiationdosesbetweenhepaticarteryinfusionchemotherapyandtransarterialchemoembolizationforlivercancer
AT shenlujun comparisonofradiationdosesbetweenhepaticarteryinfusionchemotherapyandtransarterialchemoembolizationforlivercancer