Cargando…
Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves
Danofloxacin and enrofloxacin are fluoroquinolones (FQs) used to treat and control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex. While low toxicity, high bactericidal activity, and availability in single and multiple dosing regimens make them preferable, the increasing incidence of FQ-resistance in food...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08945-z |
_version_ | 1784674615238328320 |
---|---|
author | Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa Mochel, Jonathan P. Magnin, Géraldine Hawbecker, Tyler Slagel, Clare Dewell, Grant Dewell, Renee Sahin, Orhan Coetzee, Johann F. Zhang, Qijing Plummer, Paul J. |
author_facet | Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa Mochel, Jonathan P. Magnin, Géraldine Hawbecker, Tyler Slagel, Clare Dewell, Grant Dewell, Renee Sahin, Orhan Coetzee, Johann F. Zhang, Qijing Plummer, Paul J. |
author_sort | Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Danofloxacin and enrofloxacin are fluoroquinolones (FQs) used to treat and control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex. While low toxicity, high bactericidal activity, and availability in single and multiple dosing regimens make them preferable, the increasing incidence of FQ-resistance in foodborne pathogens and effects on gut microbiota necessitate evaluating their pharmacokinetics (PKs). The objective of this study was to determine the exposure level of gut microbiota to subcutaneously administered FQs and compare their PKs between plasma and feces in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves. A single dose of danofloxacin (8 mg/kg), low dose (7.5 mg/kg), or high dose (12.5 mg/kg) of enrofloxacin was administered to calves. Blood and feces were collected from calves under experimental conditions over 48 h, and FQ concentrations were measured using Ultra High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography. While moderate BRD signs were exhibited in most calves in the infected cohorts, the plasma PKs were similar between healthy and sick calves. However, the fecal danofloxacin concentration was lower in the BRD group (area under concentration–time curve [AUC(inf)], BRD median = 2627, healthy median = 2941 h*μg/mL, adj.P = 0.005). The dose normalized plasma and fecal danofloxacin concentrations were higher than those of enrofloxacin and its metabolite ciprofloxacin. Further, FQs had several fold higher overall concentrations in feces than in plasma in both groups. In conclusion, parenterally administered FQs expose gut microbiota to high concentrations of the antibiotics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8948211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89482112022-03-28 Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa Mochel, Jonathan P. Magnin, Géraldine Hawbecker, Tyler Slagel, Clare Dewell, Grant Dewell, Renee Sahin, Orhan Coetzee, Johann F. Zhang, Qijing Plummer, Paul J. Sci Rep Article Danofloxacin and enrofloxacin are fluoroquinolones (FQs) used to treat and control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex. While low toxicity, high bactericidal activity, and availability in single and multiple dosing regimens make them preferable, the increasing incidence of FQ-resistance in foodborne pathogens and effects on gut microbiota necessitate evaluating their pharmacokinetics (PKs). The objective of this study was to determine the exposure level of gut microbiota to subcutaneously administered FQs and compare their PKs between plasma and feces in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves. A single dose of danofloxacin (8 mg/kg), low dose (7.5 mg/kg), or high dose (12.5 mg/kg) of enrofloxacin was administered to calves. Blood and feces were collected from calves under experimental conditions over 48 h, and FQ concentrations were measured using Ultra High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography. While moderate BRD signs were exhibited in most calves in the infected cohorts, the plasma PKs were similar between healthy and sick calves. However, the fecal danofloxacin concentration was lower in the BRD group (area under concentration–time curve [AUC(inf)], BRD median = 2627, healthy median = 2941 h*μg/mL, adj.P = 0.005). The dose normalized plasma and fecal danofloxacin concentrations were higher than those of enrofloxacin and its metabolite ciprofloxacin. Further, FQs had several fold higher overall concentrations in feces than in plasma in both groups. In conclusion, parenterally administered FQs expose gut microbiota to high concentrations of the antibiotics. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8948211/ /pubmed/35332195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08945-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa Mochel, Jonathan P. Magnin, Géraldine Hawbecker, Tyler Slagel, Clare Dewell, Grant Dewell, Renee Sahin, Orhan Coetzee, Johann F. Zhang, Qijing Plummer, Paul J. Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves |
title | Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves |
title_full | Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves |
title_fullStr | Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves |
title_short | Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves |
title_sort | comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and mannheimia haemolytica infected calves |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08945-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beyiashenafifeyisa comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT mocheljonathanp comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT magningeraldine comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT hawbeckertyler comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT slagelclare comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT dewellgrant comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT dewellrenee comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT sahinorhan comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT coetzeejohannf comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT zhangqijing comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves AT plummerpaulj comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves |