Cargando…

Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves

Danofloxacin and enrofloxacin are fluoroquinolones (FQs) used to treat and control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex. While low toxicity, high bactericidal activity, and availability in single and multiple dosing regimens make them preferable, the increasing incidence of FQ-resistance in food...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa, Mochel, Jonathan P., Magnin, Géraldine, Hawbecker, Tyler, Slagel, Clare, Dewell, Grant, Dewell, Renee, Sahin, Orhan, Coetzee, Johann F., Zhang, Qijing, Plummer, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08945-z
_version_ 1784674615238328320
author Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa
Mochel, Jonathan P.
Magnin, Géraldine
Hawbecker, Tyler
Slagel, Clare
Dewell, Grant
Dewell, Renee
Sahin, Orhan
Coetzee, Johann F.
Zhang, Qijing
Plummer, Paul J.
author_facet Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa
Mochel, Jonathan P.
Magnin, Géraldine
Hawbecker, Tyler
Slagel, Clare
Dewell, Grant
Dewell, Renee
Sahin, Orhan
Coetzee, Johann F.
Zhang, Qijing
Plummer, Paul J.
author_sort Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa
collection PubMed
description Danofloxacin and enrofloxacin are fluoroquinolones (FQs) used to treat and control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex. While low toxicity, high bactericidal activity, and availability in single and multiple dosing regimens make them preferable, the increasing incidence of FQ-resistance in foodborne pathogens and effects on gut microbiota necessitate evaluating their pharmacokinetics (PKs). The objective of this study was to determine the exposure level of gut microbiota to subcutaneously administered FQs and compare their PKs between plasma and feces in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves. A single dose of danofloxacin (8 mg/kg), low dose (7.5 mg/kg), or high dose (12.5 mg/kg) of enrofloxacin was administered to calves. Blood and feces were collected from calves under experimental conditions over 48 h, and FQ concentrations were measured using Ultra High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography. While moderate BRD signs were exhibited in most calves in the infected cohorts, the plasma PKs were similar between healthy and sick calves. However, the fecal danofloxacin concentration was lower in the BRD group (area under concentration–time curve [AUC(inf)], BRD median = 2627, healthy median = 2941 h*μg/mL, adj.P = 0.005). The dose normalized plasma and fecal danofloxacin concentrations were higher than those of enrofloxacin and its metabolite ciprofloxacin. Further, FQs had several fold higher overall concentrations in feces than in plasma in both groups. In conclusion, parenterally administered FQs expose gut microbiota to high concentrations of the antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8948211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89482112022-03-28 Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa Mochel, Jonathan P. Magnin, Géraldine Hawbecker, Tyler Slagel, Clare Dewell, Grant Dewell, Renee Sahin, Orhan Coetzee, Johann F. Zhang, Qijing Plummer, Paul J. Sci Rep Article Danofloxacin and enrofloxacin are fluoroquinolones (FQs) used to treat and control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex. While low toxicity, high bactericidal activity, and availability in single and multiple dosing regimens make them preferable, the increasing incidence of FQ-resistance in foodborne pathogens and effects on gut microbiota necessitate evaluating their pharmacokinetics (PKs). The objective of this study was to determine the exposure level of gut microbiota to subcutaneously administered FQs and compare their PKs between plasma and feces in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves. A single dose of danofloxacin (8 mg/kg), low dose (7.5 mg/kg), or high dose (12.5 mg/kg) of enrofloxacin was administered to calves. Blood and feces were collected from calves under experimental conditions over 48 h, and FQ concentrations were measured using Ultra High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography. While moderate BRD signs were exhibited in most calves in the infected cohorts, the plasma PKs were similar between healthy and sick calves. However, the fecal danofloxacin concentration was lower in the BRD group (area under concentration–time curve [AUC(inf)], BRD median = 2627, healthy median = 2941 h*μg/mL, adj.P = 0.005). The dose normalized plasma and fecal danofloxacin concentrations were higher than those of enrofloxacin and its metabolite ciprofloxacin. Further, FQs had several fold higher overall concentrations in feces than in plasma in both groups. In conclusion, parenterally administered FQs expose gut microbiota to high concentrations of the antibiotics. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8948211/ /pubmed/35332195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08945-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa
Mochel, Jonathan P.
Magnin, Géraldine
Hawbecker, Tyler
Slagel, Clare
Dewell, Grant
Dewell, Renee
Sahin, Orhan
Coetzee, Johann F.
Zhang, Qijing
Plummer, Paul J.
Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves
title Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves
title_full Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves
title_fullStr Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves
title_short Comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and Mannheimia haemolytica infected calves
title_sort comparisons of plasma and fecal pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin and enrofloxacin in healthy and mannheimia haemolytica infected calves
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08945-z
work_keys_str_mv AT beyiashenafifeyisa comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT mocheljonathanp comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT magningeraldine comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT hawbeckertyler comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT slagelclare comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT dewellgrant comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT dewellrenee comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT sahinorhan comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT coetzeejohannf comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT zhangqijing comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves
AT plummerpaulj comparisonsofplasmaandfecalpharmacokineticsofdanofloxacinandenrofloxacininhealthyandmannheimiahaemolyticainfectedcalves