Cargando…
Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study
Fractal analysis of dynamic, four-dimensional computed tomography myocardial perfusion (4D-CTP) imaging might have potential for noninvasive differentiation of microvascular ischemia and macrovascular coronary artery disease (CAD) using fractal dimension (FD) as quantitative parameter for perfusion...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09144-6 |
_version_ | 1784674635656200192 |
---|---|
author | Michallek, Florian Nakamura, Satoshi Ota, Hideki Ogawa, Ryo Shizuka, Takehito Nakashima, Hitoshi Wang, Yi-Ning Ito, Tatsuro Sakuma, Hajime Dewey, Marc Kitagawa, Kakuya |
author_facet | Michallek, Florian Nakamura, Satoshi Ota, Hideki Ogawa, Ryo Shizuka, Takehito Nakashima, Hitoshi Wang, Yi-Ning Ito, Tatsuro Sakuma, Hajime Dewey, Marc Kitagawa, Kakuya |
author_sort | Michallek, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fractal analysis of dynamic, four-dimensional computed tomography myocardial perfusion (4D-CTP) imaging might have potential for noninvasive differentiation of microvascular ischemia and macrovascular coronary artery disease (CAD) using fractal dimension (FD) as quantitative parameter for perfusion complexity. This multi-center proof-of-concept study included 30 rigorously characterized patients from the AMPLIFiED trial with nonoverlapping and confirmed microvascular ischemia (n(micro) = 10), macrovascular CAD (n(macro) = 10), or normal myocardial perfusion (n(normal) = 10) with invasive coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements as reference standard. Perfusion complexity was comparatively high in normal perfusion (FD(normal) = 4.49, interquartile range [IQR]:4.46–4.53), moderately reduced in microvascular ischemia (FD(micro) = 4.37, IQR:4.36–4.37), and strongly reduced in macrovascular CAD (FD(macro) = 4.26, IQR:4.24–4.27), which allowed to differentiate both ischemia types, p < 0.001. Fractal analysis agreed excellently with perfusion state (κ = 0.96, AUC = 0.98), whereas myocardial blood flow (MBF) showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.77, AUC = 0.78). For detecting CAD patients, fractal analysis outperformed MBF estimation with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 85% versus 100% and 25%, p = 0.02. In conclusion, fractal analysis of 4D-CTP allows to differentiate microvascular from macrovascular ischemia and improves detection of hemodynamically significant CAD in comparison to MBF estimation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8948301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89483012022-03-28 Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study Michallek, Florian Nakamura, Satoshi Ota, Hideki Ogawa, Ryo Shizuka, Takehito Nakashima, Hitoshi Wang, Yi-Ning Ito, Tatsuro Sakuma, Hajime Dewey, Marc Kitagawa, Kakuya Sci Rep Article Fractal analysis of dynamic, four-dimensional computed tomography myocardial perfusion (4D-CTP) imaging might have potential for noninvasive differentiation of microvascular ischemia and macrovascular coronary artery disease (CAD) using fractal dimension (FD) as quantitative parameter for perfusion complexity. This multi-center proof-of-concept study included 30 rigorously characterized patients from the AMPLIFiED trial with nonoverlapping and confirmed microvascular ischemia (n(micro) = 10), macrovascular CAD (n(macro) = 10), or normal myocardial perfusion (n(normal) = 10) with invasive coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements as reference standard. Perfusion complexity was comparatively high in normal perfusion (FD(normal) = 4.49, interquartile range [IQR]:4.46–4.53), moderately reduced in microvascular ischemia (FD(micro) = 4.37, IQR:4.36–4.37), and strongly reduced in macrovascular CAD (FD(macro) = 4.26, IQR:4.24–4.27), which allowed to differentiate both ischemia types, p < 0.001. Fractal analysis agreed excellently with perfusion state (κ = 0.96, AUC = 0.98), whereas myocardial blood flow (MBF) showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.77, AUC = 0.78). For detecting CAD patients, fractal analysis outperformed MBF estimation with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 85% versus 100% and 25%, p = 0.02. In conclusion, fractal analysis of 4D-CTP allows to differentiate microvascular from macrovascular ischemia and improves detection of hemodynamically significant CAD in comparison to MBF estimation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8948301/ /pubmed/35332236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09144-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Michallek, Florian Nakamura, Satoshi Ota, Hideki Ogawa, Ryo Shizuka, Takehito Nakashima, Hitoshi Wang, Yi-Ning Ito, Tatsuro Sakuma, Hajime Dewey, Marc Kitagawa, Kakuya Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study |
title | Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study |
title_full | Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study |
title_fullStr | Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study |
title_full_unstemmed | Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study |
title_short | Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study |
title_sort | fractal analysis of 4d dynamic myocardial stress-ct perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09144-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michallekflorian fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT nakamurasatoshi fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT otahideki fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT ogawaryo fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT shizukatakehito fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT nakashimahitoshi fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT wangyining fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT itotatsuro fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT sakumahajime fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT deweymarc fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy AT kitagawakakuya fractalanalysisof4ddynamicmyocardialstressctperfusionimagingdifferentiatesmicroandmacrovascularischemiainamulticenterproofofconceptstudy |