Cargando…

Investigating the Impact of Information Sharing in Human Activity Recognition

The accuracy of Human Activity Recognition is noticeably affected by the orientation of smartphones during data collection. This study utilized a public domain dataset that was specifically collected to include variations in smartphone positioning. Although the dataset contained records from various...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shafique, Muhammad Awais, Marchán, Sergi Saurí
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35336451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22062280
_version_ 1784674712009310208
author Shafique, Muhammad Awais
Marchán, Sergi Saurí
author_facet Shafique, Muhammad Awais
Marchán, Sergi Saurí
author_sort Shafique, Muhammad Awais
collection PubMed
description The accuracy of Human Activity Recognition is noticeably affected by the orientation of smartphones during data collection. This study utilized a public domain dataset that was specifically collected to include variations in smartphone positioning. Although the dataset contained records from various sensors, only accelerometer data were used in this study; thus, the developed methodology would preserve smartphone battery and incur low computation costs. A total of 175 different features were extracted from the pre-processed data. Data stratification was conducted in three ways to investigate the effect of information sharing between the training and testing datasets. After data balancing using only the training dataset, ten-fold and LOSO cross-validation were performed using several algorithms, including Support Vector Machine, XGBoost, Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, KNN, and Neural Network. A very simple post-processing algorithm was developed to improve the accuracy. The results reveal that XGBoost takes the least computation time while providing high prediction accuracy. Although Neural Network outperforms XGBoost, XGBoost demonstrates better accuracy with post-processing. The final detection accuracy ranges from 99.8% to 77.6% depending on the level of information sharing. This strongly suggests that when reporting accuracy values, the associated information sharing levels should be provided as well in order to allow the results to be interpreted in the correct context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8948682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89486822022-03-26 Investigating the Impact of Information Sharing in Human Activity Recognition Shafique, Muhammad Awais Marchán, Sergi Saurí Sensors (Basel) Article The accuracy of Human Activity Recognition is noticeably affected by the orientation of smartphones during data collection. This study utilized a public domain dataset that was specifically collected to include variations in smartphone positioning. Although the dataset contained records from various sensors, only accelerometer data were used in this study; thus, the developed methodology would preserve smartphone battery and incur low computation costs. A total of 175 different features were extracted from the pre-processed data. Data stratification was conducted in three ways to investigate the effect of information sharing between the training and testing datasets. After data balancing using only the training dataset, ten-fold and LOSO cross-validation were performed using several algorithms, including Support Vector Machine, XGBoost, Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, KNN, and Neural Network. A very simple post-processing algorithm was developed to improve the accuracy. The results reveal that XGBoost takes the least computation time while providing high prediction accuracy. Although Neural Network outperforms XGBoost, XGBoost demonstrates better accuracy with post-processing. The final detection accuracy ranges from 99.8% to 77.6% depending on the level of information sharing. This strongly suggests that when reporting accuracy values, the associated information sharing levels should be provided as well in order to allow the results to be interpreted in the correct context. MDPI 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8948682/ /pubmed/35336451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22062280 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shafique, Muhammad Awais
Marchán, Sergi Saurí
Investigating the Impact of Information Sharing in Human Activity Recognition
title Investigating the Impact of Information Sharing in Human Activity Recognition
title_full Investigating the Impact of Information Sharing in Human Activity Recognition
title_fullStr Investigating the Impact of Information Sharing in Human Activity Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the Impact of Information Sharing in Human Activity Recognition
title_short Investigating the Impact of Information Sharing in Human Activity Recognition
title_sort investigating the impact of information sharing in human activity recognition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35336451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22062280
work_keys_str_mv AT shafiquemuhammadawais investigatingtheimpactofinformationsharinginhumanactivityrecognition
AT marchansergisauri investigatingtheimpactofinformationsharinginhumanactivityrecognition