Cargando…

Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study

In orthodontics, post-treatment retention phase is crucial for maintaining the obtained clinical results. In cases of crowding, a bonded fixed retainer is often chosen to maintain teeth alignment in the anterior sector of the lower dental arch. A fixed retainer can remain in the mouth for years. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mummolo, Stefano, Quinzi, Vincenzo, Nota, Alessandro, Marino, Carla, Pittari, Laura, Manenti, Rebecca Jewel, Tecco, Simona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12030331
_version_ 1784674736707469312
author Mummolo, Stefano
Quinzi, Vincenzo
Nota, Alessandro
Marino, Carla
Pittari, Laura
Manenti, Rebecca Jewel
Tecco, Simona
author_facet Mummolo, Stefano
Quinzi, Vincenzo
Nota, Alessandro
Marino, Carla
Pittari, Laura
Manenti, Rebecca Jewel
Tecco, Simona
author_sort Mummolo, Stefano
collection PubMed
description In orthodontics, post-treatment retention phase is crucial for maintaining the obtained clinical results. In cases of crowding, a bonded fixed retainer is often chosen to maintain teeth alignment in the anterior sector of the lower dental arch. A fixed retainer can remain in the mouth for years. Therefore, it is important that it is applied with harmless materials for the level of plaque control. The present study aimed to investigate the salivary concentrations of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacilli, and the Sillness and Loe plaque index, in patients wearing metal wire versus fiberglass orthodontic retainers. Forty post-orthodontic patients were included in the sample: in 20 subjects a metal wire retainer was applied (MR), while in the others a fiberglass retainer was applied (FR). The variables were recorded at baseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), and after 2 months (T2) of follow-up. The percentage of patients with a level of S. mutans and Lactobacilli colonization > 10(5) increased over time in the FR group (T0 = 0%, T1 = 5%, T2 = 35%), compared with the MR group. PI increased in the FR group (T0 = 0, T1 = 14, T2 = 27), and remained almost the same in the MR group (T0 = 3, T1 = 0, T2 = 2). From the present results it appears that the metal wire retainer is better than the fiberglass retainer for the level of plaque control performed by the patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8948786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89487862022-03-26 Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study Mummolo, Stefano Quinzi, Vincenzo Nota, Alessandro Marino, Carla Pittari, Laura Manenti, Rebecca Jewel Tecco, Simona Life (Basel) Article In orthodontics, post-treatment retention phase is crucial for maintaining the obtained clinical results. In cases of crowding, a bonded fixed retainer is often chosen to maintain teeth alignment in the anterior sector of the lower dental arch. A fixed retainer can remain in the mouth for years. Therefore, it is important that it is applied with harmless materials for the level of plaque control. The present study aimed to investigate the salivary concentrations of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacilli, and the Sillness and Loe plaque index, in patients wearing metal wire versus fiberglass orthodontic retainers. Forty post-orthodontic patients were included in the sample: in 20 subjects a metal wire retainer was applied (MR), while in the others a fiberglass retainer was applied (FR). The variables were recorded at baseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), and after 2 months (T2) of follow-up. The percentage of patients with a level of S. mutans and Lactobacilli colonization > 10(5) increased over time in the FR group (T0 = 0%, T1 = 5%, T2 = 35%), compared with the MR group. PI increased in the FR group (T0 = 0, T1 = 14, T2 = 27), and remained almost the same in the MR group (T0 = 3, T1 = 0, T2 = 2). From the present results it appears that the metal wire retainer is better than the fiberglass retainer for the level of plaque control performed by the patients. MDPI 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8948786/ /pubmed/35330082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12030331 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mummolo, Stefano
Quinzi, Vincenzo
Nota, Alessandro
Marino, Carla
Pittari, Laura
Manenti, Rebecca Jewel
Tecco, Simona
Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study
title Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study
title_full Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study
title_short Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study
title_sort metal versus fiberglass post-orthodontic retainers short-term effects on plaque index and microbial colonization: an observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8948786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12030331
work_keys_str_mv AT mummolostefano metalversusfiberglasspostorthodonticretainersshorttermeffectsonplaqueindexandmicrobialcolonizationanobservationalstudy
AT quinzivincenzo metalversusfiberglasspostorthodonticretainersshorttermeffectsonplaqueindexandmicrobialcolonizationanobservationalstudy
AT notaalessandro metalversusfiberglasspostorthodonticretainersshorttermeffectsonplaqueindexandmicrobialcolonizationanobservationalstudy
AT marinocarla metalversusfiberglasspostorthodonticretainersshorttermeffectsonplaqueindexandmicrobialcolonizationanobservationalstudy
AT pittarilaura metalversusfiberglasspostorthodonticretainersshorttermeffectsonplaqueindexandmicrobialcolonizationanobservationalstudy
AT manentirebeccajewel metalversusfiberglasspostorthodonticretainersshorttermeffectsonplaqueindexandmicrobialcolonizationanobservationalstudy
AT teccosimona metalversusfiberglasspostorthodonticretainersshorttermeffectsonplaqueindexandmicrobialcolonizationanobservationalstudy