Cargando…

Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla

Purpose: Evaluate the esthetic outcome of ridge augmentation using cancellous bone-block allografts, late implant placement, and immediate loading in the atrophic anterior maxilla, by PES (pink esthetic score) and WES (white esthetic score) indexes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort study....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naishlos, Sarit, Reiser, Vadim, Zelikman, Helena, Nissan, Joseph, Masri, Daya, Nassra, Hiba, Chaushu, Gavriel, Blumer, Sigalit, Chaushu, Liat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063689
_version_ 1784674933479047168
author Naishlos, Sarit
Reiser, Vadim
Zelikman, Helena
Nissan, Joseph
Masri, Daya
Nassra, Hiba
Chaushu, Gavriel
Blumer, Sigalit
Chaushu, Liat
author_facet Naishlos, Sarit
Reiser, Vadim
Zelikman, Helena
Nissan, Joseph
Masri, Daya
Nassra, Hiba
Chaushu, Gavriel
Blumer, Sigalit
Chaushu, Liat
author_sort Naishlos, Sarit
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Evaluate the esthetic outcome of ridge augmentation using cancellous bone-block allografts, late implant placement, and immediate loading in the atrophic anterior maxilla, by PES (pink esthetic score) and WES (white esthetic score) indexes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were bone loss of at least 3 mm horizontally and 3 mm vertically according to preliminary CBCT; ridge augmentation using cancellous bone-block allografts; six months later the implant insertion and immediately loaded. PES-WES index was used for esthetic assessment of soft tissues surrounding the final implant-supported prosthesis (ISP). Results: All twenty-five successive individuals were included. The mean follow-up was 12.1 ± 56 months (range, 42–90 months). The mean PES index and WES index were 7 ± 1.74 (range: 5–10) and 8.4 ± 2.12 (range: 5–10), respectively. The mean total combination of PES index and WES index (PES/WES) was 15.3 ± 2.85 (range: 12–20). All ISPs had an overall score >12 (the defined threshold of clinical acceptability). Conclusions: Ridge augmentation in the atrophic anterior maxilla using cancellous bone-block allografts and immediate loading allows a stable esthetic result of the soft and hard tissues over the years (follow-up of 42–90 months).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8949589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89495892022-03-26 Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla Naishlos, Sarit Reiser, Vadim Zelikman, Helena Nissan, Joseph Masri, Daya Nassra, Hiba Chaushu, Gavriel Blumer, Sigalit Chaushu, Liat Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Purpose: Evaluate the esthetic outcome of ridge augmentation using cancellous bone-block allografts, late implant placement, and immediate loading in the atrophic anterior maxilla, by PES (pink esthetic score) and WES (white esthetic score) indexes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were bone loss of at least 3 mm horizontally and 3 mm vertically according to preliminary CBCT; ridge augmentation using cancellous bone-block allografts; six months later the implant insertion and immediately loaded. PES-WES index was used for esthetic assessment of soft tissues surrounding the final implant-supported prosthesis (ISP). Results: All twenty-five successive individuals were included. The mean follow-up was 12.1 ± 56 months (range, 42–90 months). The mean PES index and WES index were 7 ± 1.74 (range: 5–10) and 8.4 ± 2.12 (range: 5–10), respectively. The mean total combination of PES index and WES index (PES/WES) was 15.3 ± 2.85 (range: 12–20). All ISPs had an overall score >12 (the defined threshold of clinical acceptability). Conclusions: Ridge augmentation in the atrophic anterior maxilla using cancellous bone-block allografts and immediate loading allows a stable esthetic result of the soft and hard tissues over the years (follow-up of 42–90 months). MDPI 2022-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8949589/ /pubmed/35329376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063689 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Naishlos, Sarit
Reiser, Vadim
Zelikman, Helena
Nissan, Joseph
Masri, Daya
Nassra, Hiba
Chaushu, Gavriel
Blumer, Sigalit
Chaushu, Liat
Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla
title Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla
title_full Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla
title_fullStr Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla
title_full_unstemmed Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla
title_short Esthetic Assessment following Ridge Augmentation, Late Implant Placement and Immediate Esthetic Reconstruction of the Atrophic Anterior Maxilla
title_sort esthetic assessment following ridge augmentation, late implant placement and immediate esthetic reconstruction of the atrophic anterior maxilla
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063689
work_keys_str_mv AT naishlossarit estheticassessmentfollowingridgeaugmentationlateimplantplacementandimmediateestheticreconstructionoftheatrophicanteriormaxilla
AT reiservadim estheticassessmentfollowingridgeaugmentationlateimplantplacementandimmediateestheticreconstructionoftheatrophicanteriormaxilla
AT zelikmanhelena estheticassessmentfollowingridgeaugmentationlateimplantplacementandimmediateestheticreconstructionoftheatrophicanteriormaxilla
AT nissanjoseph estheticassessmentfollowingridgeaugmentationlateimplantplacementandimmediateestheticreconstructionoftheatrophicanteriormaxilla
AT masridaya estheticassessmentfollowingridgeaugmentationlateimplantplacementandimmediateestheticreconstructionoftheatrophicanteriormaxilla
AT nassrahiba estheticassessmentfollowingridgeaugmentationlateimplantplacementandimmediateestheticreconstructionoftheatrophicanteriormaxilla
AT chaushugavriel estheticassessmentfollowingridgeaugmentationlateimplantplacementandimmediateestheticreconstructionoftheatrophicanteriormaxilla
AT blumersigalit estheticassessmentfollowingridgeaugmentationlateimplantplacementandimmediateestheticreconstructionoftheatrophicanteriormaxilla
AT chaushuliat estheticassessmentfollowingridgeaugmentationlateimplantplacementandimmediateestheticreconstructionoftheatrophicanteriormaxilla