Cargando…

LeiP#netz 2.0: mapping COVID-19-related changes in mental health services in the German city of Leipzig

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the changes in psychosocial and psychiatric services in the German city of Leipzig during the COVID-19-pandemic. METHODS: A participatory, mixed-methods study was used involving a quantitative online survey and qualitative semi-structured intervie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duden, Gesa Solveig, Gersdorf, Stefanie, Trautmann, Kai, Steinhart, Ingmar, Riedel-Heller, Steffi, Stengler, Katarina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35333930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02274-2
_version_ 1784674946740387840
author Duden, Gesa Solveig
Gersdorf, Stefanie
Trautmann, Kai
Steinhart, Ingmar
Riedel-Heller, Steffi
Stengler, Katarina
author_facet Duden, Gesa Solveig
Gersdorf, Stefanie
Trautmann, Kai
Steinhart, Ingmar
Riedel-Heller, Steffi
Stengler, Katarina
author_sort Duden, Gesa Solveig
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the changes in psychosocial and psychiatric services in the German city of Leipzig during the COVID-19-pandemic. METHODS: A participatory, mixed-methods study was used involving a quantitative online survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews with professionals. Quantitative findings were reported with descriptive statistics, and thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data. RESULTS: Fifty professionals from various mental health services participated in the survey and eleven professionals were interviewed. Quantitative findings showed that some services were closed intermittently and that there was a stiff increase in use of digital/telephonic service and a decrease in face-to-face services. Staff or funding did not change considerably during the pandemic. Psychosocial groups were suspended or reduced, while access to services became more difficult and professional training for staff was stopped. Thematic analysis of the interviews showed that professionals experienced different phases and levels of change during the pandemic, including changes on a structural level, on the users’ level, and on the staff’ level. Professionals particularly criticised the equivocality of COVID-19 regulations, a defective flow of information and lack of attention for mental healthcare in public policies. They also saw positive aspects, such as the capacity of users and the outpatient care system to adapt to the new situation. CONCLUSION: This study suggests directions for policy and service development, such as communicating clearly in infection-control measures, fostering outpatient care and networks between services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8949643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89496432022-03-25 LeiP#netz 2.0: mapping COVID-19-related changes in mental health services in the German city of Leipzig Duden, Gesa Solveig Gersdorf, Stefanie Trautmann, Kai Steinhart, Ingmar Riedel-Heller, Steffi Stengler, Katarina Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Original Paper PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the changes in psychosocial and psychiatric services in the German city of Leipzig during the COVID-19-pandemic. METHODS: A participatory, mixed-methods study was used involving a quantitative online survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews with professionals. Quantitative findings were reported with descriptive statistics, and thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data. RESULTS: Fifty professionals from various mental health services participated in the survey and eleven professionals were interviewed. Quantitative findings showed that some services were closed intermittently and that there was a stiff increase in use of digital/telephonic service and a decrease in face-to-face services. Staff or funding did not change considerably during the pandemic. Psychosocial groups were suspended or reduced, while access to services became more difficult and professional training for staff was stopped. Thematic analysis of the interviews showed that professionals experienced different phases and levels of change during the pandemic, including changes on a structural level, on the users’ level, and on the staff’ level. Professionals particularly criticised the equivocality of COVID-19 regulations, a defective flow of information and lack of attention for mental healthcare in public policies. They also saw positive aspects, such as the capacity of users and the outpatient care system to adapt to the new situation. CONCLUSION: This study suggests directions for policy and service development, such as communicating clearly in infection-control measures, fostering outpatient care and networks between services. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8949643/ /pubmed/35333930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02274-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Duden, Gesa Solveig
Gersdorf, Stefanie
Trautmann, Kai
Steinhart, Ingmar
Riedel-Heller, Steffi
Stengler, Katarina
LeiP#netz 2.0: mapping COVID-19-related changes in mental health services in the German city of Leipzig
title LeiP#netz 2.0: mapping COVID-19-related changes in mental health services in the German city of Leipzig
title_full LeiP#netz 2.0: mapping COVID-19-related changes in mental health services in the German city of Leipzig
title_fullStr LeiP#netz 2.0: mapping COVID-19-related changes in mental health services in the German city of Leipzig
title_full_unstemmed LeiP#netz 2.0: mapping COVID-19-related changes in mental health services in the German city of Leipzig
title_short LeiP#netz 2.0: mapping COVID-19-related changes in mental health services in the German city of Leipzig
title_sort leip#netz 2.0: mapping covid-19-related changes in mental health services in the german city of leipzig
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35333930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02274-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dudengesasolveig leipnetz20mappingcovid19relatedchangesinmentalhealthservicesinthegermancityofleipzig
AT gersdorfstefanie leipnetz20mappingcovid19relatedchangesinmentalhealthservicesinthegermancityofleipzig
AT trautmannkai leipnetz20mappingcovid19relatedchangesinmentalhealthservicesinthegermancityofleipzig
AT steinhartingmar leipnetz20mappingcovid19relatedchangesinmentalhealthservicesinthegermancityofleipzig
AT riedelhellersteffi leipnetz20mappingcovid19relatedchangesinmentalhealthservicesinthegermancityofleipzig
AT stenglerkatarina leipnetz20mappingcovid19relatedchangesinmentalhealthservicesinthegermancityofleipzig