Cargando…

Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) increases exercise capacity, with less clear evidence regarding physical activity (PA). The World Health Organization recommends at least 150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75-150 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA per week to reduce the risks of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaplin, Emma, Barnes, Amy, Newby, Chris, Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy, Singh, Sally J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35266871
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28875
_version_ 1784674970979270656
author Chaplin, Emma
Barnes, Amy
Newby, Chris
Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
Singh, Sally J
author_facet Chaplin, Emma
Barnes, Amy
Newby, Chris
Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
Singh, Sally J
author_sort Chaplin, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) increases exercise capacity, with less clear evidence regarding physical activity (PA). The World Health Organization recommends at least 150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75-150 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA per week to reduce the risks of chronic disease. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of conventional PR versus web-based PR with respect to changes in PA. METHODS: Patients with COPD were randomized to either conventional PR classes (n=51) or a web-based PR program (n=52) for 7 weeks in a feasibility study. Accelerometers (Sensewear) were worn before and after the intervention, and PA was measured as steps per day and mean bouts of moderate activity for ≥2, ≥5, ≥10, and ≥20 minutes. Measures were derived for patients with ≥8 hours of data per day for ≥4 days, using the R package for statistical analysis. Variables were explored to examine their relationships with bouts of activity. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Complete PA data were available for the groups receiving web-based (n=20) and conventional (n=34) PR interventions. The web-based PR group demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in the number of steps per day, which mainly comprised short bouts of moderate to vigorous intensity PA when compared to the conventional PR group (P=.20). The conventional PR group demonstrated increased 20-minute bouts of PA by 49.1%, although this was not significant (P=.07). At baseline, age (r=–0.21, P=.04), BMI (r=–0.311, P=.004), and FEV(1) (forced expiratory volume in 1 second; % predicted; r=–0.248, P=.048) were significantly correlated with 10-minute bouts of PA; however, this was not observed post intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference in the pattern of PA between groups receiving conventional vs web-based PR—the former being associated with an increase in 20-minute bouts, while the latter having demonstrated an increase in the number of steps per day. There appears to be a differing response emerging between the two interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trials Registry ISRCTN03142263; https://tinyurl.com/y4dmfyrb
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8949713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89497132022-03-26 Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study Chaplin, Emma Barnes, Amy Newby, Chris Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy Singh, Sally J JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) increases exercise capacity, with less clear evidence regarding physical activity (PA). The World Health Organization recommends at least 150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75-150 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA per week to reduce the risks of chronic disease. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of conventional PR versus web-based PR with respect to changes in PA. METHODS: Patients with COPD were randomized to either conventional PR classes (n=51) or a web-based PR program (n=52) for 7 weeks in a feasibility study. Accelerometers (Sensewear) were worn before and after the intervention, and PA was measured as steps per day and mean bouts of moderate activity for ≥2, ≥5, ≥10, and ≥20 minutes. Measures were derived for patients with ≥8 hours of data per day for ≥4 days, using the R package for statistical analysis. Variables were explored to examine their relationships with bouts of activity. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Complete PA data were available for the groups receiving web-based (n=20) and conventional (n=34) PR interventions. The web-based PR group demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in the number of steps per day, which mainly comprised short bouts of moderate to vigorous intensity PA when compared to the conventional PR group (P=.20). The conventional PR group demonstrated increased 20-minute bouts of PA by 49.1%, although this was not significant (P=.07). At baseline, age (r=–0.21, P=.04), BMI (r=–0.311, P=.004), and FEV(1) (forced expiratory volume in 1 second; % predicted; r=–0.248, P=.048) were significantly correlated with 10-minute bouts of PA; however, this was not observed post intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference in the pattern of PA between groups receiving conventional vs web-based PR—the former being associated with an increase in 20-minute bouts, while the latter having demonstrated an increase in the number of steps per day. There appears to be a differing response emerging between the two interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trials Registry ISRCTN03142263; https://tinyurl.com/y4dmfyrb JMIR Publications 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8949713/ /pubmed/35266871 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28875 Text en ©Emma Chaplin, Amy Barnes, Chris Newby, Linzy Houchen-Wolloff, Sally J Singh. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 10.03.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Chaplin, Emma
Barnes, Amy
Newby, Chris
Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
Singh, Sally J
Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_full Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_short Comparison of the Impact of Conventional and Web-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Exploratory Feasibility Study
title_sort comparison of the impact of conventional and web-based pulmonary rehabilitation on physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: exploratory feasibility study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35266871
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28875
work_keys_str_mv AT chaplinemma comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy
AT barnesamy comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy
AT newbychris comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy
AT houchenwollofflinzy comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy
AT singhsallyj comparisonoftheimpactofconventionalandwebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationonphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexploratoryfeasibilitystudy