Cargando…

Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep

The present study was conducted to estimate the (co)variance components for birth and weaning weight (BW and WW) in 8142 Awassi sheep between 2015 and 2017. Estimates were calculated with single-trait analysis by the average information restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) method, using a derivat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hızlı, Hatice, Takma, Çiğdem, Yazgan, Ertan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Copernicus GmbH 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350593
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/aab-65-121-2022
_version_ 1784674990625390592
author Hızlı, Hatice
Takma, Çiğdem
Yazgan, Ertan
author_facet Hızlı, Hatice
Takma, Çiğdem
Yazgan, Ertan
author_sort Hızlı, Hatice
collection PubMed
description The present study was conducted to estimate the (co)variance components for birth and weaning weight (BW and WW) in 8142 Awassi sheep between 2015 and 2017. Estimates were calculated with single-trait analysis by the average information restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) method, using a derivative-free algorithm by fitting six different univariate animal models. The negative of the log-likelihood function (LogL), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) tests were used for selecting the best fitted model. In addition, the goodness of fit between the two models was compared with the likelihood ratio test (LRT). Depending on the models, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] ranged from 0.230 to 0.240 and 0.015 to 0.033 for BW, and 0.108 to 0.168 and 0.024 to 0.081 for WW, respectively. Model 3 for BW and Model 2 for WW were chosen as the best models by LogL comparison criteria. According to the LRT ratio test Model 2, Model 3, and Model 4 for BW and Model 2, Model 3, Model 4, Model 5, and Model 6 for WW were significant ( [Formula: see text] ). Including maternal genetic or maternal permanent environmental effects in these models was found to be significant in terms of parameter estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8949804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89498042022-03-28 Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep Hızlı, Hatice Takma, Çiğdem Yazgan, Ertan Arch Anim Breed Original Study The present study was conducted to estimate the (co)variance components for birth and weaning weight (BW and WW) in 8142 Awassi sheep between 2015 and 2017. Estimates were calculated with single-trait analysis by the average information restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) method, using a derivative-free algorithm by fitting six different univariate animal models. The negative of the log-likelihood function (LogL), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) tests were used for selecting the best fitted model. In addition, the goodness of fit between the two models was compared with the likelihood ratio test (LRT). Depending on the models, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] ranged from 0.230 to 0.240 and 0.015 to 0.033 for BW, and 0.108 to 0.168 and 0.024 to 0.081 for WW, respectively. Model 3 for BW and Model 2 for WW were chosen as the best models by LogL comparison criteria. According to the LRT ratio test Model 2, Model 3, and Model 4 for BW and Model 2, Model 3, Model 4, Model 5, and Model 6 for WW were significant ( [Formula: see text] ). Including maternal genetic or maternal permanent environmental effects in these models was found to be significant in terms of parameter estimates. Copernicus GmbH 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8949804/ /pubmed/35350593 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/aab-65-121-2022 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Hatice Hızlı et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Study
Hızlı, Hatice
Takma, Çiğdem
Yazgan, Ertan
Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep
title Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep
title_full Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep
title_fullStr Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep
title_short Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep
title_sort comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in awassi sheep
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350593
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/aab-65-121-2022
work_keys_str_mv AT hızlıhatice comparisonofdifferentmodelsforestimationofdirectandmaternalgeneticparametersonbodyweightsinawassisheep
AT takmacigdem comparisonofdifferentmodelsforestimationofdirectandmaternalgeneticparametersonbodyweightsinawassisheep
AT yazganertan comparisonofdifferentmodelsforestimationofdirectandmaternalgeneticparametersonbodyweightsinawassisheep