Cargando…
Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep
The present study was conducted to estimate the (co)variance components for birth and weaning weight (BW and WW) in 8142 Awassi sheep between 2015 and 2017. Estimates were calculated with single-trait analysis by the average information restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) method, using a derivat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Copernicus GmbH
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350593 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/aab-65-121-2022 |
_version_ | 1784674990625390592 |
---|---|
author | Hızlı, Hatice Takma, Çiğdem Yazgan, Ertan |
author_facet | Hızlı, Hatice Takma, Çiğdem Yazgan, Ertan |
author_sort | Hızlı, Hatice |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study was conducted to estimate the (co)variance components for birth and weaning weight (BW and WW) in 8142 Awassi sheep between 2015 and 2017. Estimates were calculated with single-trait analysis by the average information restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) method, using a derivative-free algorithm by fitting six different univariate animal models. The negative of the log-likelihood function (LogL), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) tests were used for selecting the best fitted model. In addition, the goodness of fit between the two models was compared with the likelihood ratio test (LRT). Depending on the models, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] ranged from 0.230 to 0.240 and 0.015 to 0.033 for BW, and 0.108 to 0.168 and 0.024 to 0.081 for WW, respectively. Model 3 for BW and Model 2 for WW were chosen as the best models by LogL comparison criteria. According to the LRT ratio test Model 2, Model 3, and Model 4 for BW and Model 2, Model 3, Model 4, Model 5, and Model 6 for WW were significant ( [Formula: see text] ). Including maternal genetic or maternal permanent environmental effects in these models was found to be significant in terms of parameter estimates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8949804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Copernicus GmbH |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89498042022-03-28 Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep Hızlı, Hatice Takma, Çiğdem Yazgan, Ertan Arch Anim Breed Original Study The present study was conducted to estimate the (co)variance components for birth and weaning weight (BW and WW) in 8142 Awassi sheep between 2015 and 2017. Estimates were calculated with single-trait analysis by the average information restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) method, using a derivative-free algorithm by fitting six different univariate animal models. The negative of the log-likelihood function (LogL), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) tests were used for selecting the best fitted model. In addition, the goodness of fit between the two models was compared with the likelihood ratio test (LRT). Depending on the models, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] ranged from 0.230 to 0.240 and 0.015 to 0.033 for BW, and 0.108 to 0.168 and 0.024 to 0.081 for WW, respectively. Model 3 for BW and Model 2 for WW were chosen as the best models by LogL comparison criteria. According to the LRT ratio test Model 2, Model 3, and Model 4 for BW and Model 2, Model 3, Model 4, Model 5, and Model 6 for WW were significant ( [Formula: see text] ). Including maternal genetic or maternal permanent environmental effects in these models was found to be significant in terms of parameter estimates. Copernicus GmbH 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8949804/ /pubmed/35350593 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/aab-65-121-2022 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Hatice Hızlı et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Study Hızlı, Hatice Takma, Çiğdem Yazgan, Ertan Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep |
title | Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep |
title_full | Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep |
title_fullStr | Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep |
title_short | Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep |
title_sort | comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in awassi sheep |
topic | Original Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350593 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/aab-65-121-2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hızlıhatice comparisonofdifferentmodelsforestimationofdirectandmaternalgeneticparametersonbodyweightsinawassisheep AT takmacigdem comparisonofdifferentmodelsforestimationofdirectandmaternalgeneticparametersonbodyweightsinawassisheep AT yazganertan comparisonofdifferentmodelsforestimationofdirectandmaternalgeneticparametersonbodyweightsinawassisheep |