Cargando…
Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of tooth width measurements and Bolton Indices delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 software (Align Technology, San José, CA, USA). Fifty-four plaster casts were selected and measured with a manual calliper by a trained and calibrat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063581 |
_version_ | 1784675056204382208 |
---|---|
author | Adobes Martin, Milagros Lipani, Erica Bernes Martinez, Laura Alvarado Lorenzo, Alfonso Aiuto, Riccardo Garcovich, Daniele |
author_facet | Adobes Martin, Milagros Lipani, Erica Bernes Martinez, Laura Alvarado Lorenzo, Alfonso Aiuto, Riccardo Garcovich, Daniele |
author_sort | Adobes Martin, Milagros |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of tooth width measurements and Bolton Indices delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 software (Align Technology, San José, CA, USA). Fifty-four plaster casts were selected and measured with a manual calliper by a trained and calibrated observer. The data gathered were compared with those delivered by the software on the corresponding fifty-four virtual casts. The method reliability of the software was assessed by comparing the measurements performed by the software on 201 pairs of clin-checks corresponding to two consecutive treatment phases. Accuracy and reliability were statistically assessed using a mixed model. The software tends to provide larger widths compared with the manual method. Statistically significant differences were found in 23 teeth. At a global level, the mean difference between the methods was −0.19 mm, with a Dahlberg error of 0.24 mm and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98. The Bolton Indices delivered by the two methods had a moderate correlation (ICC = 0.59; 0.69). The within method reliability of the software was extremely high. Tooth width measurements delivered by the software, despite the positive bias, can be considered accurate and clinically acceptable for all teeth except molars. The Bolton Indices made available by the software are not accurate and clinically acceptable, especially in the case of mandibular excess. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8950071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89500712022-03-26 Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study Adobes Martin, Milagros Lipani, Erica Bernes Martinez, Laura Alvarado Lorenzo, Alfonso Aiuto, Riccardo Garcovich, Daniele Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of tooth width measurements and Bolton Indices delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 software (Align Technology, San José, CA, USA). Fifty-four plaster casts were selected and measured with a manual calliper by a trained and calibrated observer. The data gathered were compared with those delivered by the software on the corresponding fifty-four virtual casts. The method reliability of the software was assessed by comparing the measurements performed by the software on 201 pairs of clin-checks corresponding to two consecutive treatment phases. Accuracy and reliability were statistically assessed using a mixed model. The software tends to provide larger widths compared with the manual method. Statistically significant differences were found in 23 teeth. At a global level, the mean difference between the methods was −0.19 mm, with a Dahlberg error of 0.24 mm and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98. The Bolton Indices delivered by the two methods had a moderate correlation (ICC = 0.59; 0.69). The within method reliability of the software was extremely high. Tooth width measurements delivered by the software, despite the positive bias, can be considered accurate and clinically acceptable for all teeth except molars. The Bolton Indices made available by the software are not accurate and clinically acceptable, especially in the case of mandibular excess. MDPI 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8950071/ /pubmed/35329271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063581 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Adobes Martin, Milagros Lipani, Erica Bernes Martinez, Laura Alvarado Lorenzo, Alfonso Aiuto, Riccardo Garcovich, Daniele Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | reliability of tooth width measurements delivered by the clin-check pro 6.0 software on digital casts: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adobesmartinmilagros reliabilityoftoothwidthmeasurementsdeliveredbytheclincheckpro60softwareondigitalcastsacrosssectionalstudy AT lipanierica reliabilityoftoothwidthmeasurementsdeliveredbytheclincheckpro60softwareondigitalcastsacrosssectionalstudy AT bernesmartinezlaura reliabilityoftoothwidthmeasurementsdeliveredbytheclincheckpro60softwareondigitalcastsacrosssectionalstudy AT alvaradolorenzoalfonso reliabilityoftoothwidthmeasurementsdeliveredbytheclincheckpro60softwareondigitalcastsacrosssectionalstudy AT aiutoriccardo reliabilityoftoothwidthmeasurementsdeliveredbytheclincheckpro60softwareondigitalcastsacrosssectionalstudy AT garcovichdaniele reliabilityoftoothwidthmeasurementsdeliveredbytheclincheckpro60softwareondigitalcastsacrosssectionalstudy |