Cargando…

Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent today. Disc degeneration could be one of the causes of non-specific LBP, and increased intradiscal pressure (IDP) can potentially induce disc degeneration. The differences in vivo IDP in sitting and standing postures have been studied,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jia-Qi, Kwong, Wai-Hang, Chan, Yuk-Lam, Kawabata, Masato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12030457
_version_ 1784675078064046080
author Li, Jia-Qi
Kwong, Wai-Hang
Chan, Yuk-Lam
Kawabata, Masato
author_facet Li, Jia-Qi
Kwong, Wai-Hang
Chan, Yuk-Lam
Kawabata, Masato
author_sort Li, Jia-Qi
collection PubMed
description Background: Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent today. Disc degeneration could be one of the causes of non-specific LBP, and increased intradiscal pressure (IDP) can potentially induce disc degeneration. The differences in vivo IDP in sitting and standing postures have been studied, but inconsistent results have been reported. The primary objective of this systematic review is to compare the differences in vivo IDP between sitting and standing postures. The secondary objective of this review is to compare effect size estimates between (1) dated and more recent studies and (2) healthy and degenerated intervertebral discs. Methods: An exhaustive search of six electronic databases for studies published before November 2021 was conducted. Articles measuring in vivo IDP in sitting and standing postures were included. Two independent researchers conducted the screening and data extraction. Results: Ten studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review, and seven studies with nine independent groups were included in meta-analyses. The sitting posture induces a significantly higher IDP on the lumbar spine (SMD: 0.87; 95% CI = [0.33, 1.41]) than the standing posture. In studies published after 1990 and subjects with degenerated discs, there are no differences in vivo IDP between both postures. Conclusions: Sitting causes higher loads on the lumbar spine than standing in the normal discs, but recent studies do not support this conclusion. Furthermore, the degenerated discs showed no difference in IDP in both postures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8950176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89501762022-03-26 Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Li, Jia-Qi Kwong, Wai-Hang Chan, Yuk-Lam Kawabata, Masato Life (Basel) Systematic Review Background: Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent today. Disc degeneration could be one of the causes of non-specific LBP, and increased intradiscal pressure (IDP) can potentially induce disc degeneration. The differences in vivo IDP in sitting and standing postures have been studied, but inconsistent results have been reported. The primary objective of this systematic review is to compare the differences in vivo IDP between sitting and standing postures. The secondary objective of this review is to compare effect size estimates between (1) dated and more recent studies and (2) healthy and degenerated intervertebral discs. Methods: An exhaustive search of six electronic databases for studies published before November 2021 was conducted. Articles measuring in vivo IDP in sitting and standing postures were included. Two independent researchers conducted the screening and data extraction. Results: Ten studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review, and seven studies with nine independent groups were included in meta-analyses. The sitting posture induces a significantly higher IDP on the lumbar spine (SMD: 0.87; 95% CI = [0.33, 1.41]) than the standing posture. In studies published after 1990 and subjects with degenerated discs, there are no differences in vivo IDP between both postures. Conclusions: Sitting causes higher loads on the lumbar spine than standing in the normal discs, but recent studies do not support this conclusion. Furthermore, the degenerated discs showed no difference in IDP in both postures. MDPI 2022-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8950176/ /pubmed/35330208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12030457 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Li, Jia-Qi
Kwong, Wai-Hang
Chan, Yuk-Lam
Kawabata, Masato
Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of in vivo intradiscal pressure between sitting and standing in human lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12030457
work_keys_str_mv AT lijiaqi comparisonofinvivointradiscalpressurebetweensittingandstandinginhumanlumbarspineasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kwongwaihang comparisonofinvivointradiscalpressurebetweensittingandstandinginhumanlumbarspineasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chanyuklam comparisonofinvivointradiscalpressurebetweensittingandstandinginhumanlumbarspineasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kawabatamasato comparisonofinvivointradiscalpressurebetweensittingandstandinginhumanlumbarspineasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis